Jump to content

Electrostatic Headphone Measurements


TMoney

Recommended Posts

Gu Sensei's post of measurements of the SR-009s from a Japanese Stax thread raised some interesting discussion. While the measurements he posted are interesting as a conversation piece, there are questions about the quality of the data and methodology of the testing. The measurements are not nearly as useful as the type of through headphone measurements that our very own Tyll Hertsens has been making and posing over on the Inner Fidelity site.

In the want for more objective data on stats, Tyll has graciously agreed to measure electrostats if we can send them out to him in Montana.

The plan will be to coordinate people sending in their gear so that Tyll can measure the electrostatic lineup we are able to get to him off of a single electrostatic amplifier. As Tyll does not presently have an electrostat amp, we are going to have to send one. Voltron has volunteered his 007t, but if anyone has a higher end amp they'd like to send we can use that instead.

I'll be sending along my 009s as well as helping coordinate the effort. As Tyll is only able to measure a few headphones at a time, we will be assigning shipping dates via PM and the spreadsheet..

If this sounds like a good idea, and if you are willing to send in some electrostat gear to Tyll for measurement, please leave your information in the spreadsheet here. It will be great to have some quality measurements for the Stax range.

Edited by TMoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope this is okay with everyone. Just make sure your gear is in needed in the spreadsheet, and then PM me and we'll coordinate the gear movement.

Al, I am interested in the loan of an amp for a few months to get some cans measured. I have no idea if yours is a good one to use, or if I should be using another amp. I'd be happy to hear suggestions from others. I reckon I should use something as ballsy and neutral as I can so that the measurements reflect the headphones most accurately. So, suggestions welcome.

Um ... once an amp is covered, I can measure one to three headphones a week, roughly. Headphones would be here one to two weeks. I try to move the DIY cans quickly, but have only been moderately successful. Anyway, I'll try to get them back quickly.

Looking forward to measuring some stats!

Edited by Tyll Hertsens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got something you can borrow for a month or two, Tyll.

My life's been so hectic I haven't been enjoying much of my gear lately (not to mention working 7:30am to 8:30pm sometimes).

I just need some rest from, well, everything,

I have two other amps to keep me company while you do your thing.

Very nice offer SO and TMoney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got something you can borrow for a month or two, Tyll.

Wow! That's very cool man, thanks. But the question is: should I be using a tube amp to do measurements? Would there be too much characteristic (second order for example) distortion on a tube amp to ferrit out a clean view of the headphone? Would I be better off with a dryer, but more technically accurate solid state amp so as to see the characteristics of the headphones more clearly?

You'll have to pardon my ignorance guys, just have done many measurements of estats. The ones I have done were really weird though, so I'd love to know I'm off to a sure start. Don't want to have to do this stuff twice.

What does the Stax mafia think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SO and Tyll, once you guys are ready to send and receive the amp, I'll go ahead and send along the 009s to get the ball rolling on this project. Might as well get it kicked off with a bang.

Short of having a DIY T-2 to measure, the 009-BHSE combo ought to produce results that rival or surpass anything Tyll's measured so far. It'll be especially interesting to put the "009s are bright" claim to the test. I don't really hear it myself, but the measurements should give us a definitive answer. At this point only time will tell.

N3rdling... thanks for the advice on the ear pads. I hope once the project gets underway you might consider volunteering a few highlights from your collection if you are feeling up to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with using that particular tube amp (BHSE) since it is mostly SS and the tube output stage doesn't behave like a "normal" tube amp. It's also about as good as it gets. smile.png

Yay. If there was a Stax Mafia, which there isn't, such a group would clearly have an interest in ensuring their "thing" be evaluated under the best possible conditions. Also, it would obviously be extremely unfortunate for all of headphonedom if Tyll's measurement suite totally accidentally blew up, burned down and sank into the swamp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should have some KGSSHV's up and running in a few months (I'm going to build a few) so a TOTL SS amp would be available for testing then. Still the KGSSHV is more of an effort to approach the Blue Hawaii in performance but not having tubes to worry about (and people debating different ones) does have its advantages.

I'm going to send you something to test Tyll but it will have to wait until I first receive and have time to completely refurb then. First off would be my utterly mint and SR-1 set (circa 1962-4) to show just how good first generation Stax was. I also have a SR-X Mk1 incoming which was the first set Stax made for the Pro market. One of only two Stax sets I've never tried (the other being the impossible to find SR-2) so I'm really looking forward to testing it out. Now with these vintage sets you need a normal bias amp with not too much output voltage as they will arc violently when fed too much juice (ditto for the HE90) so I have a 1969 SRA-3S preamp incoming which is perfect for this. One of the best amps Stax ever made (just ask Kevin, he had one back in the day) which I'll completely rebuild to not fall into the same trap as Hi-Fi News when testing vintage gear.

Yay. If there was a Stax Mafia, which there isn't, such a group would clearly have an interest in ensuring their "thing" be evaluated under the best possible conditions. Also, it would obviously be extremely unfortunate for all of headphonedom if Tyll's measurement suite totally accidentally blew up, burned down and sank into the swamp.

It would certainly be a shame is something like that were to occur... smiley_devil.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tyll,

I sent you an email at inner fidelity adress in regards to waterfall plots, any plan to include that in the standard tests? Purrin posted some example in the sr009 thread and it's quite useful at revealing resonances. In case you don't have the tools to post-process it, I wouldn't mind generating the graphs for you from the impulse response data...

Otherwise, I could mail you my 009 but I am a bit concerned with damage during transport, esp. since we never got confirmation that the troubles with previous batch were not related to transport...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

......so I have a 1969 SRA-3S preamp incoming which is perfect for this. One of the best amps Stax ever made (just ask Kevin, he had one back in the day) which I'll completely rebuild to not fall into the same trap as Hi-Fi News when testing vintage gear.

The one I heard in Melbourne was far better than the SRA12s that I had at the time. Terrific amp, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.