Dreadhead Posted March 26, 2011 Report Posted March 26, 2011 Yup ER4s are the awesome in portables for the same purpose. The only ones I use. Though I am very interested once the new JH-16A/13A are finished to see what they are like, especially if you can adjust the EQ at home....
postjack Posted March 26, 2011 Report Posted March 26, 2011 (edited) Man I left my er4 on a plane years ago. Wish I had them now, I miss them. Edited March 26, 2011 by postjack
cetoole Posted March 26, 2011 Report Posted March 26, 2011 The Lambdas (any of them really) are very good but they have always been more about generating a speaker like soundstage rather than absolute transparency. There is also some mild bass boom (though the new ones are much better here) while the SR-X is pretty much at a Grado level for soundstage but don't sound like poo (bar the HP-1000 though)... The KGSSHV is still in prototype phase but you can get the board files to have some made. The amp does work just fine and it is a screaming bargain given how advanced it is. First you don't like the SR-202 (probably the only one) and now the 4070? You need moar booze... I actually did best on that online distortion listening test dealie with the normal bias lambdas. Weird, eh? Haven't heard LNS... Wanna?
spritzer Posted March 26, 2011 Report Posted March 26, 2011 The SR-Lambda is something truly special. It goes up there with the SR-1 and SR-3 as some of my all time favorite headphones...
robm321 Posted March 26, 2011 Report Posted March 26, 2011 I love the ER-4. It is a king for this. And a God per £. Which is why I'm pissed off that my pair just died. Agreed. Mine died too awhile back. This thread is making me want to send them in for repair.
NwAvGuy Posted March 26, 2011 Author Report Posted March 26, 2011 Besides the fussy fit, filter hassles, and being relatively fragile, I agree my ER4's are probably the most accurate of what I own. I also wasn't trying to write off the AKG's. I'd love to hear them sometime. Lot's to think about. I'm going to do some experiments with the Denons and Etys and see how that goes. I'll see how I score blind with Foobar ABX and some test files with slight differences and let everyone know what I find out--at least with my ears and choice in music. If I get my hands on any of the others mentioned, I can repeat the same ABX trial and get a good idea if they're really any more revealing that what I have. Out of everything mentioned, the Stax probably hold the most appeal. I love a big soundstage, I remember liking the old ones I heard, and they're probably the most different from what I already have. So they might make a fun addition. Unlike speakers, which can take up lots of space, it's harder to have too many headphones, right?
Son Goten Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 HD800 it was so revealing that i sold them... but the comfort is just incredible, the last time i saw a pair it was enough for me just to put it on again... without listening.
Tyll Hertsens Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 (edited) ^^^Nice. Awesome first post dude ... yer so fucked. Edited June 27, 2011 by Tyll Hertsens
The Monkey Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 The HD 800 pressed down on the top of my head. Fail. Sounded pretty good though. Not great.
nnotis Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 Just to confuse things more for the OP, here's my assessment in terms of resolution: I found the HD800s to be equal to the K1000s, unless you consider sub bass. Since the K1000s don't have any, the HD800s win. I found the JH13s to exceed the K1000s across the spectrum. And I find the LDC-2s are noticeably better than the JH13s. When I talk about detail, I'm referring to both the depiction of textural clarity and the ability to parse out single sounds in complex passages. I don't know why my impressions of the LCD-2s differ so much from those of others on this site. They smear uber dens mixes less than anything else I've heard. After reading this thread, I'd love to have another go with the HD800s though. Maybe I just didn't hear them right before.
jvlgato Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 soup cans are revealing cans, once you've opened them. How do you plug soup cans into a 1/4" jack, and what kind of cabling do you use?
jvlgato Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 I bet the noodles work better when they're frozen.
Aimless1 Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 If the noodles are frozen the sound is congested.
jvlgato Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 Huh. I thought the freezing would cause the noodle molecules to become aligned and allow them to conduct in a more time coherent manner.
jvlgato Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 Oh, are cryoed noodles different from frozen noodles?
jvlgato Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 I believe you are all misleading me with the intent to sell me cold noodles.
jvlgato Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 Ok, you've convinced me. I'll have one pair of captain planet cryoed chicken noodle interconnects, please, but only if it's less than $1000. I only hope that it comes with the Campbell's soup included.
morphsci Posted June 27, 2011 Report Posted June 27, 2011 [Mikhail]The soup is a $500 upgrade. But that includes Cardas silver solder to reseal the can after the noodles are removed.[/Mikhail] 1
Dusty Chalk Posted June 28, 2011 Report Posted June 28, 2011 (likes this whole 'al dente cans pasta is the best pasta' concept)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now