Tyll Hertsens Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 (edited) Monster is whacking Fanny on alleged "trade dress infringement." Wha..? Looks like the Solo. I wonder how they sound? Edited December 31, 2010 by Dusty Chalk
Salt Peanuts Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Tyll, you got extra "http://" on the link posted.
Salt Peanuts Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 I wonder how long before they start suing other headphone companies? This did remind me of BJC's pure win of a response to Monster couple of years back - Monster Cable Correspondence.
Fitz Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 At least there's some justification for this for once, rather than the usual out of nowhere hurrrrrrrr u make cables 2 or have "monster" in ur namez.
CarlSeibert Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Really, the big news here is the name. First amps that are the Schiitz, now this. I want Fanny Wangs! (Maybe it is too easy a target. Nevertheless, that was the softball pitch. We need Steve to drive it out of the park. Paging Dr Wood........)
Fitz Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 ill put forth they sound like PENGAS. yeah thats right cracka what
Fitz Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 pfft, 10 points for thread relevance, minus 100 for FAKE pengas
mypasswordis Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 I think penis gourds are the best I can do without being forcibly censored
boomana Posted January 1, 2011 Report Posted January 1, 2011 Not even wat, but why? You took time doing that? To post it? In this thread?
mypasswordis Posted January 1, 2011 Report Posted January 1, 2011 (edited) I guess you guys don't remember it from the speaker porn thread Edit: Actually that does mean I took time to do it.. just several months ago if that helps any Edited January 1, 2011 by mypasswordis
screaming oranges Posted January 1, 2011 Report Posted January 1, 2011 Needs more shell-design, like this!
aardvark baguette Posted January 2, 2011 Report Posted January 2, 2011 I guess you guys don't remember it from the speaker porn thread Edit: Actually that does mean I took time to do it.. just several months ago if that helps any I remember it. True art.
Voltron Posted January 4, 2011 Report Posted January 4, 2011 Round headphones molded right into the headband endorsed by a rapper? Sleek by 50 Cent is going to be next in Monster's legal war.
Dusty Chalk Posted January 4, 2011 Report Posted January 4, 2011 And the stylized "s" logo is a little too close to what would be the font for the Beats "b" -- this is one lawsuit I actually think is Monster's.
catscratch Posted January 5, 2011 Report Posted January 5, 2011 (edited) Typical Monster behavior, trying to crush competition before it starts. Smart, too, if you take ethics out of it, but given how they spend their time bullying small business while Noel Lee drives around in a Bentley from West Coast Customs, that's easier said than done. I was reading through the Blue Jeans Cables' brilliant response to Monster's accusations and one thing caught my eye: ... there is little doubt that making baseless claims of trade dress infringement and design patent infringement is an improper business tactic, which can give rise to unfair competition claims, and for a company of Monster's size, potential antitrust violations with treble damages and attorney's fees. Is this true? Are there any advocacy groups that can actually make this happen? I would love to see Monster piss off the wrong people, if only it gets them to change their MO, but I don't know if that's likely or realistic. Edited January 5, 2011 by catscratch
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now