Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I find ESW9s to be very accurate tonally, but what do I know.

I'd say pick up an MDR-V700DJ for example, take a listen, and see how far apart the two actually are. The ESW9's are agreeable for sure, but I think some people got carried away.

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It also mystifies me how people don't run simple comparisons with things they own and want to compare at the same time against another established baseline. I guess it's too much to ask.

1282004046091.jpg

For fucks sake man, are you deliberately trying to annoy the piss out of everyone lately?

Posted
For fucks sake man, are you deliberately trying to annoy the piss out of everyone lately?

See reply above. While it can sometimes be somewhat entertaining to poke a stick into peer groups of various kinds, not entirely deliberately.

When I kick back and listen, I have to say I'm generally pretty happy with anything decent - but when I'm talking about relatives, I think its worth it to be more thorough than a few brief meet impressions. Sometimes I go over the edge - e.g. I once bought two HD650s and wrapped them in plastic bags for two weeks to run a test and prove a point to myself. But otherwise you're just butting egos.

Posted
any recommendation that includes mdr-v700s is yes, someone trying to troll

You wish. I kind of wished, since mine got stuck in customs and I had to pay tax on top.

The 700 is my 'low water mark' - and as such, a useful reference. Of course the ESW9 is not worse - but it was a little too close to the 700's for comfort.

Posted
I find ESW9s to be very accurate tonally, but what do I know.

I still really like their overall tone. But more recently I'm finding them too closed and congested, and not lively enough by comparison to my other gear :(

Posted
I still really like their overall tone. But more recently I'm finding them too closed and congested, and not lively enough by comparison to my other gear :(

Apart from the obvious externals, the tone is definitely what sells it. For most people, I think the visual impression of the wood / overall materials, and the sound that you're consequently expecting rationally or not, was a great match to the tone the phone produces (in a way that e.g the EW9 or the W1000 didn't manage).

But the technicals aren't there to the same level, especially as it's not that isolating so it's harder to attribute any compromises down to a usefully isolating design. For me at least, I'll take more chops (and isolation) for this type of use even if it means less bloom down low.

Posted

I never had a problem with the amount of isolation. They strike a perfect balanced between drowning out minor noise, and not allowing co-workers to sneak up on me for practical jokes......

Posted
I never had a problem with the amount of isolation. They strike a perfect balanced between drowning out minor noise, and not allowing co-workers to sneak up on me for practical jokes......

Exactly. I'm sure they'd suit a cubicle slave fine. I'm actually outside when I use a portable closed phone.

As far as comfort goes, it's the old ear-cartilage mangling typical of a supraaural phone. I didn't find it that heinous, but some might.

Posted

I say politically correct because I can either support Tyll and purchase at Headroom, or support Head Case and use the Amazon link. My head doth explode.

Posted

Good. I need a few other items from the 'zon anyway. Like one of those handy gooseneck webcams with nightvison so I can see (in the wall) if I'll be able to pull my own hdmi cabling. Yay.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Listening now. And while they are enjoyable, I'm gonna say that there is not the right synergy withy a CK2III. They are both a bit laid back which could be good for some of the work I do (which needs my undivided attention) but when I'm on autopilot I might want a bit more upfront sound. I saw someone had paired these with an M3. That might provide me what I'm looking for...

Beefy said: "I still really like their overall tone. But more recently I'm finding them too closed and congested, and not lively enough by comparison to my other gear." That's what I'm hearing. I'll need to figure out what I was listening to when I first heard these because this is not what I remember.

Ah well, no worries. They're still nice. Just gotta get the right amp now.

Posted

It was probably me you are thinking of with respect to the M3, and that is where my comments regarding their sound come from.

I haven't heard the CKKIII, so I can't compare. But if they aren't blowing up your skirt right off the bat, then I don't think the amp swap is going to make that much difference.

Posted

Good call. Yeah, you're probably right. But I should loop through all of the gear I have just in case ;)

This might be the right place for one of those "good lord what a bright sounding source" finds. Thanks for the reply, man.

Posted (edited)

Speaking of socks, I have Clayton/Hamilton Jazz Orchestra on now. Sounds pretty durn good so these might be far more recording dependent than I thought. Weird. Just a touch dry, but better.

Oh god, Nature Boy is on this album. gack.

Edited by bhjazz
Posted

Freak. So I brought an iPod as a source using RockBox software on it. The old 'pod doesn't get out much. I had set it up for some other pair of 'phones...and apparently had set it to headbanger mode because the bass was set too high. I caught it just a bit ago when listening to Audioslave and the bass was stupidly distorted. I thought wtf? Now that it's adjusted back to normal, this is a nice combination. Far more musical than it was this morning on the same tunes. Coolio.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.