Jump to content

AyreWave music player


Currawong

Recommended Posts

A new music player:

AyreWave from sbooth.org

Mentioned here: Stereophile: Wavelength Leads the Way

Initial impressions this morning is that it puts out better music than Amarra Mini (2.0.1). More texture to instruments (low-level detail) with my LCD-2 or borrowed O2 rigs. If I don't pay attention, but just listen to a good acoustic track in a relaxed manner in both, then I get the feeling that Amarra is a little bit more hard-edged digital in presentation and with AyreWave the music sounds a bit more "real".

The simple UI is good: Select a bunch of tracks in iTunes or the Finder and click on the relevant button in AyreWave to add them to the persistent playlist.

Pretty damn good for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I thought Amarra was bit perfect. But a Sonic Studios rep won't answer one way or the other

Is Amarra bit-perfect?

Below is the text of an email from Jon Reichbach of Sonic Studio which was posted on another forum in response to the question "Is Amarra bit-perfect?"

"In almost all Digital Audio Processing systems there is some amount of processing.

For example, every 24 bit integer PCM sample is most likely converted to a float and then back to a sample in the audio driver/hardware.

Other types of processing could include Gain, EQ, and Dither. Amarra does not process the data in anyway unless the user specifies it.

There are times though when some processing is important. For example, when using the digital gain in Amarra one would want to apply dither as it will improve the sound. Likewise, if the EQ can help with the bass response then it should be used. The fact is that most modern day Digital Audio system perform some manipulation of the audio, even for simple conversion.

Regarding bit perfect, the HDCD light will show that the HDCD sync bit is being read correctly as detailed in the HDCD specification This bit is verified every 10 frames (1/3 of a second of audio). It does not guarantee that all the bits are OK, nor does it guarantee that every bit is correct only that the HDCD sync mark is valid. On the other hand, this is a very good indication that the audio is correct but is not an indication of full data integrity. Only with a valid digital NULL test where both signals are played in synch with one out of phase can a full bit test be done.

The most important part of this is how it sounds."

enjoy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you open up the Console, do you get any interesting errors relating to the program?

As for bit perfect, I wouldn't imagine that turning on dither and a set output word length in the prefs would output bit perfect. I think the whole bit-perfect thing is a hangover from Windows XP discussion where the system screwed up the audio output. For me, I've thought to experiment whether allowing Amarra Mini to increase the word length to 24 bits (with or without dither) made any difference compared to the 840c's up-sampling, or that of the Reference 3. Some playing around only revealed that the volume level changed switching up-sampling on and off in the Cambridge, so without an SPL meter, I'm rather screwed trying to discern a difference. Going by my average knowledge of digital things, I'd probably have to listen at damaging levels to discern a difference anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I thought Amarra was bit perfect. But a Sonic Studios rep won't answer one way or the other
This basically confirms what I am saying, I.E. that the answer is no, it's not bit perfect, unless you have all processing turned off:
Is Amarra bit-perfect?

Below is the text of an email from Jon Reichbach of Sonic Studio which was posted on another forum in response to the question "Is Amarra bit-perfect?"

"In almost all Digital Audio Processing systems there is some amount of processing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure they are in this together?

Anyway, back to PM for me. Remote function just is essential from ipad/itouch.

Besides, after initial impressions, sound seems pretty similar. Amazing how strong placebo is after reading impressions of something. I tend to hear what i read right away, then on closer inspection, the halo of delusion evaporates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is most awesome! Haven't even reached for the APL in months. It is easier and i have all four of my amps hooked up to a breakout cable, so easy switching for my many moods ;).

I should figure out how to run the APL through the Model 4. That would make things easier.

Edited by blubliss
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using the Pure Music player for a while and I like it. I demo'ed Amara 4 and, straight out of the box, I enjoyed the Amara's sound better. After dicking around with the settings on PM for a while, I founds some settings that emulated the stuff I liked with Amara and considering the price difference, I've been sticking with PM. I like the way you can tailor PM to whatever you like and while it was pretty clunky for a while, it's pretty stable now.

I'd still prefer to have the option of native flac support but until iTunes supports it, it doesn't matter much.

I still listen to analog of one sort or another the majority of my "pleasure" listening time so spending a ton of money on a computer based player for me just doesn't make sense for me.

I'm glad to see an open source player with audiophile aspirations hit the scene. I'll download it and give it a whirl (I saw the Stereophile blog and I'm glad this thread reminded me to download it). "Play" isn't too shabby sounding and I listened to it for a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Stephen Booth is going to get a phone call from Charles Hansen? The name certainly seems to create potential for confusion given that there's already one quite well-known Ayre in the audio space.

In the about box, it says:

Special Thanks to:

Charles Hansen

J. Gordon Rankin

Clarke Greene

I'd suspect Ayre knows about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure they are in this together?

Anyway, back to PM for me. Remote function just is essential from ipad/itouch.

Besides, after initial impressions, sound seems pretty similar. Amazing how strong placebo is after reading impressions of something. I tend to hear what i read right away, then on closer inspection, the halo of delusion evaporates.

I contemplated not posting impressions in my first post for this reason. Probably what I need to do is use it for a while, switch to something else, and see how I feel. Usually it ends up being that I feel the music is better or worse with one or the other this way. I did that with digital cables, though in the end it was BNC vs. RCA, and the former, being closer to spec, won easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read impressions at Computer Audiophile. I barely go to that place because most of the stuff there is utter BS.

I'm sorry to say that I agree with you 100% Andy.

Unfortunately, when it comes to computer audio, the only places I've found with good info have been the Pro Audio forums and there's quite a learning curve to understand what the hell they're talking about there many times.

The last couple of upgrades of PM have been bug free (afaik). I use memory play in hog mode with no dithering and most of the other stuff shut off for most music. For classical (I have lots of 24/48 files) I also use upsampling with the highest fidelity option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.