Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Well, after everything running fine for a couple weeks, something gave out in the power supply. No pop or spark or smoke but the +500V just dropped down to nothing.

Amp boards themselves are fine. On the PSU, the 15V+/- and the -500V are fine. The transformer is good. All the sand and the diodes were replaced on the +500. The traces look fine. No scorch marks under any caps or resistors I can see. I think it's become connected to the ground plane somehow past the R2 and R3 power resistors on the main +500 rail.

I made a crude measured voltage map of the working and nonworking sides to compare. Working one might be helpful in the future for anyone else troubleshooting a 500V PSU on a KGSSHV. I know that sort of thing was asked about earlier in the thread. Mostly posting see if I'm on the right track or missing something really obvious.

Sorry about the orientation. It was just easier for me to compare left to right.

lTS8Uqz.png

Posted

First thing I figured when it went out was HV rectifier bridge, so I replaced that and the zener string at the same time just because I had the parts laying around. Didn't fix it. So then I replaced all the other transistors and diodes at the same time. Must've blown the new parts piecemeal then when I powered it up. Going to have to do the whole thing at the same time then now I suppose just to be sure. Well, I had to make a new mouser order for some other stuff anyway. Thanks. I'll give it another try in a few days.

Posted

Have you checked the AC voltage out of the transformer without it being connected to the power supply board?

Posted
Just now, wink said:

Have you checked the AC voltage out of the transformer without it being connected to the power supply board?

Yeah. Both the 450VAC windings are fine. Same result if you switch them. Negative rail on the PSU ramps up to spec and the positive sits within a volt or two of zero.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Tinkerer said:

Yeah. Both the 450VAC windings are fine. Same result if you switch them. Negative rail on the PSU ramps up to spec and the positive sits within a volt or two of zero.

...the stth512 has 2V drop, and you have excatly 4V after rectifying ....and you ac is 450V .... I'd try if the connector terminal for the AC is ok?

Edited by sorenb
Posted

Welp, soren called it. Cold joint on the terminal block. Must have missed it when I reflowed the components originally. That was a lot of desoldering and hassle over nothing. Thanks for helping me work through things again guys.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This must be a record slow build, but I now have a working PSU (+448v -448v) and all is fine - Pro Bias also OK. I need normal bias as I currently only have Sr5. For normal bias, I tapped the circuit where the 500v option jumper connects (on the same side as the pro bias connection) and duplicated the circuit from the 10m90S to outpuit, with a 230v zener string. I presume if I was going to tap the circuit on the other side of the jumper (straight off the bridge without the voltage doubler) it would need another 15k? resistor in series Which side should I tap?

Posted
43 minutes ago, DHTGUY said:

This must be a record slow build, but I now have a working PSU (+448v -448v) and all is fine - Pro Bias also OK. I need normal bias as I currently only have Sr5. For normal bias, I tapped the circuit where the 500v option jumper connects (on the same side as the pro bias connection) and duplicated the circuit from the 10m90S to outpuit, with a 230v zener string. I presume if I was going to tap the circuit on the other side of the jumper (straight off the bridge without the voltage doubler) it would need another 15k? resistor in series Which side should I tap?

I'd rather change the values off the zener-string a bit an tap the NB from there. Then you only need to add three resistors and a couple of caps.
Like Kevin has done here:

kNeDWgh.jpg

As you may notice, there are two NB BIAS connections corresponding to the two pins on the jack.

/S

Posted

Thanks John. What is the reason for the 10M90S (I should work it out from the data sheet I suppose), if a divider works OK? (the 2 x 178k are just what I have available). I suppose the calculated 225v above is near enough to 230 to be fine

Posted

0.01uF 250v tiny enough? Should it be on the bias out side of the 4.7M ballast resistor (then the storage is important agreed) - or on the divider side? I'm interested to know the advantage of the 10m90s

Posted

Never put a cap after the ballast resistor.  That will damage the headphones over the long term.  Stax used to do it back in the 70's but have since learned their lesson. 

That cap would work before the ballast but I'd still leave it out in favor of a cap before the divider.  The 10M90 is worthwhile to do to fully regulate the bias. 

Posted

Hmm - perhaps I'll do another board with the 10m90s again (I managed to damage (fry) the one I made by not waiting long enogh for cleaning solvent to evaporate ). Thanks all - just a cap before the divider makes sense.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.