swt61 Posted May 3, 2010 Author Report Posted May 3, 2010 Yep. It seems as though they used an oil or wax finish. I would most likely deconstruct them to apply a sturdier finish. Probably a multi coat Tung oil based finish. That would also allow me to copy the wood housing with one from Ebony, Cocobolo or something a bit more unique.
shellylh Posted May 3, 2010 Report Posted May 3, 2010 Glad it is out, but definitely more than I had hoped. At the initial mentioned price, I would have almost certainly given it a shot, but at nearly 50% more, I will need to wait until I hear it, and probably look for a used pair. Exactly my thought.
luvdunhill Posted May 3, 2010 Report Posted May 3, 2010 ok, I feel the love again... just talked with Alex. Steve, when will you have the "cans-with-headphoneaddict-like-description" in your hands?
swt61 Posted May 3, 2010 Author Report Posted May 3, 2010 Huh? I'm not following the joke, but assume you mean the TPs? If so, Don shipped them today. What's up?
luvdunhill Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 I'm not following the joke "dBel84 tuned, N_Maher cabled, smeggy created, Macassar Ebonied Thunderpants"
Smeggy Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 well they'll certainly be very different, them being open and TPs being closed. The Audeze probably has twice the driver surface of the Fostex driver, sadly that price will put them out of reach for a while.
swt61 Posted May 4, 2010 Author Report Posted May 4, 2010 "dBel84 tuned, N_Maher cabled, smeggy created, Macassar Ebonied Thunderpants" Oh, duh! So I'm not the smartest, my job is just to look pretty.
dBel84 Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 LOL at quote as for the LCD2 - not anticipated but not unexpected. I wish I could explain what I hear more vividly. To me it is like all the vintage orthos bundled into one mother load. My vintage orthos are friggin good, and in part, they rival the LCD2 but not one does it all and this is what we have all been striving for in the ortho world - the one that gets it right. I am afraid the LCD2 does it for me. ..dB
Smeggy Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 one day they will do it for me too. I feel bound to get a set.
DefectiveAudioComponent Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 I just can't resist a steampunk-styled ortho, especially one that hopefully sounds as great as I expect the LCD-2 to do. Trade-in is more than fair I think. (I need something with more bass extension than the LCD-1. I hope the LCD-2 will deliver.)
Currawong Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 WTF, more headphones to add to the list to try and kill the HD-800s with? Meh! I like the look of them. Specs say they 91 dB/mW, so does that mean lots of current will be required most ideally?
mypasswordis Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 I just can't resist a steampunk-styled ortho, especially one that hopefully sounds as great as I expect the LCD-2 to do. Trade-in is more than fair I think. (I need something with more bass extension than the LCD-1. I hope the LCD-2 will deliver.) Have you seen the frequency response graph? The bass extension is off the charts. The treble, on the other hand, needs some help.
DefectiveAudioComponent Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 Have you seen the frequency response graph? The bass extension is off the charts. The treble, on the other hand, needs some help. Will that affect air or sparkle or headstage then? The LCD-1 has plenty of that, but lacks bass extension IMHO. (I can't afford to have both the 1 and the 2) For the price of the LCD-2, I'd like to have it all.
swt61 Posted May 4, 2010 Author Report Posted May 4, 2010 Pretty sure I'm still in for a pair, but I do plan to listen at CJ first. Heck I guess I could always sell Marc's Krell integrated that's sitting here.
Currawong Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 Where's this FR graph? The only pictures on previous pages said "No longer available".
DefectiveAudioComponent Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 Where's this FR graph? The only pictures on previous pages said "No longer available". One of the lines is the LCD-2, the texts below the image says.... (or does it even say that much...?)
luvdunhill Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 Heck I guess I could always sell Marc's Krell integrated that's sitting here. you wouldn't want to separate two lost lovers that have yet to be united?
Torpedo Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 I posted it a few pages ago and seems it's still working:
DefectiveAudioComponent Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 I posted it a few pages ago and seems it's still working: photo_unavailable.gif Doesn't seem to work from over here.... but I attached a new one. Perhaps that works.
mypasswordis Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 Will that affect air or sparkle or headstage then? The LCD-1 has plenty of that, but lacks bass extension IMHO. (I can't afford to have both the 1 and the 2) For the price of the LCD-2, I'd like to have it all. Sure it will affect those, 6-10dB off from the bass/mids will do that. But how much it will effect those things remains to be heard. The waterfall plot they have posted is just a thumbnail with no link the big image, which I'd be curious to see. The back grille seems to be easy enough to unscrew and mess with damping, which will limit bass extension, but who the heck needs bass extension to 5Hz? And agreed about number 2).
swt61 Posted May 4, 2010 Author Report Posted May 4, 2010 From what I hear from Don, most of you will be quite happy with them in stock form. And according to Don they're quite well balanced. I'm glad that CJ10 is so close, as this is one headphone I'd really like to hear sooner as opposed to later.
DefectiveAudioComponent Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 Sure it will affect those, 6-10dB off from the bass/mids will do that. But how much it will effect those things remains to be heard. The waterfall plot they have posted is just a thumbnail with no link the big image, which I'd be curious to see. The back grille seems to be easy enough to unscrew and mess with damping, which will limit bass extension, but who the heck needs bass extension to 5Hz? And agreed about number 2). For 950, I want them tuned to sound great out of the box! Not so small waterfall now? (but what does it all mean.... ?)
Torpedo Posted May 4, 2010 Report Posted May 4, 2010 It's incredible, it displays OK here. Anyway, despite the smoothing and all, the graph is impressive. I'm willing to read your impressions, I hope you manage to try them at CJ.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now