Grahame Posted November 13, 2009 Report Posted November 13, 2009 Are you saying that data is transferred to the the device without any errors? How the heck does this thing work? Let me google that for you
Fitz Posted November 13, 2009 Report Posted November 13, 2009 You'll really blow his mind if you show him how you can unhook the network cable or shut off the computer hosting the files, and music will keep playing for a few minutes.
j4cbo Posted November 13, 2009 Report Posted November 13, 2009 If you plug it back in soon enough, it won't even stop.
dreamwhisper Posted November 16, 2009 Author Report Posted November 16, 2009 Here's another transport that has BNC output: Genesis digital lens (only supports 16 bit) AudiogoN ForSale: Genesis digital Leaving this and the Transporter as the only known computer-as-source transports that output BNC so far.
dreamwhisper Posted November 16, 2009 Author Report Posted November 16, 2009 yeah I remember reading somewhere that the reason why toslink was favoured over coaxial for some people (providing they have that available input) was because more jitter was introduced/quality lost in conversion of the signal to toslink than to coaxial this opened my eyes a bit; apparently quality is lost/jitter is introduced depending on what input/conversion you use? hence why I brought the Transporter's data conversion up I thought this was common knowledge, but perhaps I'm misinformed If the information above is true, it doesn't make sense to convert the digital signal unnecessarily unless you need it for something else (like wireless transmission, or perhaps if the specs for jitter rejection are better, like a Digital Lens or D2D-1)
dreamwhisper Posted November 17, 2009 Author Report Posted November 17, 2009 on a second glance, the digital lens doesn't actually output the elusive BNC and on a side note, this thread really is nothing but fail on my part, drinking too much coffee must be introducing jitter in the digital signals traveling to my brain
pompon Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 ...assuming that cables are important, (I don't want to get arguments started) Is the quality of digital cables as important as the quality of analog cables? EDITed for clarification hahaa I tried 5 different COAX (bulk rca audio, belden 75ohms, DIY unknow, VD and Stereovox. They all gave a significant difference in the sound. ...but I do not know if all the cables were under the standard 75 ohms. Anyway, it is necessary that the DAC circuit itself is calibrated in 75 ohms and the same thing for transport. The perceived subjective differences were similar than analog cable.
Pars Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 SPDIF is a system; the transmit circuitry, the cable/connectors and the receive circuitry. If you are using RCA connectors, you have deviated from 75 ohms right there. Most transmit/receive circuits are also not terminated correctly (regardless of equipment price). The cable length also matters. Jocko, etc. all think that 1.5m or greater is the minimum length. Dan Lavry thinks it should be as short as possible. I would tend towards the >1.5m. Of the cables you tried, the Stereovox has a good reputation for being technically correct. You can search diyaudio and diyhifi.org for more technical details. Dan Lavry posted on hf in a cable thread regarding the length issue, but Jocko is/was an RF engineer and knows what he is doing (if you can get him to tell you ).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now