Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, Dusty Chalk said:

No, I remember even before , the HD600 was considered veiled unless you amped it properly . I don't consider one more veiled than the other . 

I always thought that "veiled unless amped properly" just meant "like most headphones, they sound best when properly amplified."

  • Like 4
Posted

Yeah, but this was in the early days, when most people were not amplifying properly.  And yes, you're right, most headphones "scale" -- they respond well to increasingly better amplification.  I think the HD600 are worse than most (in the same way I think the VTGs and the Sony MDR-7506/-V6 are better than most, in that they scale very little).

Posted
44 minutes ago, grawk said:

The reason I like VTGs and JH13s is they sound basically as good straight from my iphone as from most amps.

Yeah, that's what I was trying to say about the VTGs.  I probably should not have said, "...in the same way..." when I really meant "...the same, only different..."

Posted
2 hours ago, Dusty Chalk said:

Yeah, but this was in the early days, when most people were not amplifying properly.  And yes, you're right, most headphones "scale" -- they respond well to increasingly better amplification.  I think the HD600 are worse than most (in the same way I think the VTGs and the Sony MDR-7506/-V6 are better than most, in that they scale very little).

High impedance, relatively low sensitivity. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.