GPH Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 I think Blutarsky is selling his HD600 for a good price. I told him I'd loan him a nice 4-pin XLR cable for his ZDT and he'd change his mind real fast (he also should get new pads). Are you Blutarsky's official spokesman?
Hopstretch Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 Mid-Fi FTW. I have recently been mulling a truly high-end IEM design consisting in the main of twin angelic choirs dancing upon the heads of dual platinum pins. I believe this to be both psycho-acoustically and theologically sound.
Aura Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 The ugly splatter paint? I actually liked that paint job on the HD600 that I owned. The headphone looked practically untouched from the previous owner without a scratch on it, and the glossy coat really looked good in certain lighting.
Dusty Chalk Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 Actually, I am going to say that if you do not really like the 650 you probably should look elsewhere than the 600. This is actually the closest to what advice I would give, were I serious. They really are very close. Though there are scores of people who like one and not the other, so they must be very close to the line. The Line == that threshold of quality/fidelity/musicality/value/whathaveyou/whatnot/whatever below which we care not to go.
John E Woven Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 I think you should. I mean, if you don't like them, someone would gladly take them off your hands for more or less the same price you paid for them. Oh yeah, they might sound good too.
TC_Shadow Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 I haven't spent much time with the HD600 and now that I've sold the HD800, the 650 sounds a bit boomy. Granted, it is headphiled, but I suspect it would still sound boomy if I were to replace the grills. Any thoughts re the 600? I haven't spent much time with it. And what would be a good price used? I had my HD600 for over 2 yrs before selling it in favor of HD650. IMO HD650 has a more engaging and transparent midrange (you can probably tell I am big on midrange performance), which was, at the time, enough for me to give up HD600. Both are non-offending. HD600 is probably just a had quicker at the extremes. Although the latest HD650 revision probably makes that a moot point.
diebenkorn Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 I have a pair of 600's (with 580 grills, 600 grills sound better imo) I dont use that I can bring to the NY meet.
Fungi Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 I also thought HD600 > HD650. Of course I like the K701 so that makes me a loony.
TC_Shadow Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 Just out of curiosity, have ppl here compared the new versions of both headphones? I assume there are 2 versions out there, unless you tell me I am wrong.
The Monkey Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Posted November 5, 2009 Each one is a different version apparently.
Trav Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 Sennheiser HD600 / HD-600 Hi-Fi Professional Stereo Headphones, bstock w/ Warran DAKmart
TC_Shadow Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 Actually there are 8 versions, 2^3 what you really wanted to say was 6 since 8 makes no sense at all. n items with m versions = n*m , and not n^m
Hopstretch Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 what you really wanted to say was 6 since 8 makes no sense at all. n items with m versions = n*m , and not n^m You badly need to recalibrate your jocularity detector.
Dusty Chalk Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 It depends on what your definition of "version" is.
TC_Shadow Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 It depends on what your definition of "version" is. driver version Based on my limited knowledge, there are black-cloth and white-cloth versions for both headphones. I don't remember people mentioning any other version.
thrice Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 You badly need to recalibrate your jocularity detector. Jocularity, Jocularity!
The Monkey Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Posted November 5, 2009 I want to know how is 2^3 = 8 not correct?
morphsci Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 what you really wanted to say was 6 since 8 makes no sense at all. n items with m versions = n*m , and not n^m You badly need to recalibrate your jocularity detector. Yep, what he said plus:
TC_Shadow Posted November 5, 2009 Report Posted November 5, 2009 I want to know how is 2^3 = 8 not correct? 2 headphones with 3 versions each right? Headphone A ver1 Headphone A ver2 Headphone A ver3 Headphone B ver1 Headphone B ver2 Headphone B ver3 total 6 versions.
The Monkey Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Posted November 5, 2009 I sense a timeout in the near future...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now