Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I rarely post praises of commercial gear as a prefer to build my own, knowing that each component is used in the correct topology is important to me. I am no shill as you can see from my 2000 posts on head-fi.

I have to say that this 19MK3 is an outstanding piece of gear. They have done three things extremely well:

1. PMD100 - I'll say it till my death it is the pinnacle of the digital golden age. One day these will be worth $1000 a chip, mark my word.

2. PCM1704K - Erno Borbely told me personally that this is the finest DAC chip ever made, some would argue the AD8162(Jocko) or the PCM63K, but regardless it is a much better design than sigma-delta chips.

3. Zero feedback analog stage - all these $1000 DAC with C-moys on the output make me sick, this is the way to go.

Results is that this DAC can convey the ambience of the recording as well as any source I have heard, I can listen to good recordings that that the guitar would sound distant and dull on lesser DAC's but with the 19MK3 the instruments have life!

I hope we see a trend toward R2R DAC's in this price range with discrete zero feedback output stages.

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I have to admit that I am at once intrigued by and skeptical of the audio-gd stuff. But I agree that its nice to see the good chipses in use.

To what other DACs would you compare the 19mk3?

I'm also finding the various models and naming conventions to be extremely confusing on the audio-gd website.

Posted

Colin (cetoole's) stage is zero feedback; jocko's (and all the variants I've seen including the rbroer one I have used) are also zero feedback. I like the sound based on what I've used heard, particularly compared to opamp stages (which by definition use a lot of feedback).

Posted

PMD100s haven't been made for what? A decade? And now someone is introducing a product built using them? I'm not sure what the projected volume of these things is, but 100? 200? I haven't seen any sellers touting having that many of them. Legit? Perhaps...

Posted

PMD100 knockoffs are certainly easy to generate since you just need to copy the code over to another chip. Of course China also is most likely where most of the old stock is located. PCM1704s I would guess are pretty difficult to knockoff.

Posted
PMD100 knockoffs are certainly easy to generate since you just need to copy the code over to another chip.

And presumably, that'd be just as good since the code is really the thing.

PCM1704s I would guess are pretty difficult to knockoff.

Pfft. You just need a steady hand with the laser trimmer. And really, really good eyesight.

Posted
PMD100 knockoffs are certainly easy to generate since you just need to copy the code over to another chip. Of course China also is most likely where most of the old stock is located. PCM1704s I would guess are pretty difficult to knockoff.

I'm not sure. The PMD200 is a Blackfin, but I suspect the PMD100 may be hardwired silicon.

Posted
PCM1704s I would guess are pretty difficult to knockoff.
Also: this. So yeah, either they're (real/genuine/non-cloned) PCM1704s, or they're not. I'm not sure they could be "knocked off" (pretty sure that isn't the correct way to put that in the past tense, but...whatever).
Posted

What they are doing is pulling and re-using old chips from equipment others throw away. The cost to tool up and reverse engineer a PMD100 or PCM1704 would be exponentially higher than finding junkyard chips. Unless he is selling a million units a years there would be no payback.

And yes I veryified that the PMD100 decodes HDCD. Also swapped the chip with a PMD100 from a 1994 Audio Alchemy and they sounded the same.

In a decade DAC's like this with a good digital filter and an R2R DAC are going to be like gold, just like old tube equipment is now. Sigma-Delta chips are flat out inferior.

As far as stamping a "K" on the (non K) PCM1704's, I wouldn't put that past anybody, even TI !

Posted
I'm glad you brought up the zero-feedback -- that is intriguing, and I don't think it's been mentioned before.

The Adcom you heard sunday had no NFB in the analog stage.

They could also be "non authorized", meaning the tooling was stolen or what have you.

Or possibly rejects, parts which work, but didnt meet spec.

I'm not sure. The PMD200 is a Blackfin, but I suspect the PMD100 may be hardwired silicon.

Almost certain the PMD100 is an ASIC.

Posted

Naa, Kingwa doesn't bullshit about parts being real. If anything, it pisses him off as much as it does us. He asked me once about where to buy some or other part overseas as he completely didn't trust places in China.

I did briefly try a DAC19MK3 belonging to a Japanese customer who was having issues (with his computer as it turns out, not the DAC) and it was significantly better than the Compass in detail. Other than the Ref 1, I didn't have, nor could I access another other DAC to compare it to, but I can say it sounds like its specs suggest (PCM1704UK, PMD100) -- smooth, but not over-smooth like the Assemblage DAC3. Somewhere in a thread on the other site someone posted the RMAA from a Japanese site of it, which was flat with the usual roll-off at 20k from the filter. I didn't notice anything particularly specific using the different inputs, but I wasn't trying to. I reckon it would be great value if it were balanced and not just SE. Would be interesting to compare it to the usual suspects between $500-1000, such as the Stello, Benchmark and PS Audio and see how it fares in, say, a $1k Stax rig with vintage Lambdas. IMO and all that.

Posted

Currawong, how is the coloration with the DAC19MK3?

The Pico is very nice but after spending time with it for 3 weeks, I suppose I could use something more neutral.

Posted
Currawong, how is the coloration with the DAC19MK3?

The Pico is very nice but after spending time with it for 3 weeks, I suppose I could use something more neutral.

It's voiced neutral, and is smooth and natural sounding. It doesn't have the colouration of the Compass, for example. Still the same overall sound signature though, which to people who are used to artificially bright gear, sounds "dark".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.