Dusty Chalk Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 So apparently you guys who think computer audio is the way to go are deluding yourselves: meh . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aardvark baguette Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 glanced at this in Gmail for all of about 5 seconds before losing interest. I try to mount my hard drives on a 45 degree slant, because if you short stroke your drives, then PRAT is enhanced in an organic, rhythmic motion with each rotation, which counters jitter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted September 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Dude, did you get to page 3? He starts trashing the "sound" of USB... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aardvark baguette Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I skimmed it, but it was clear about the 'controversial' part in the email blast, that he was going to suggest as much. I did read a few of the comments. heh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atothex Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 They're tearing him a new one heh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I used to be a big proponent of computer audio but after reading that I've given up on computers completely - True story. <_________< Honestly though, computers were never meant to be "optimized for audio" (unless you're willing to spend major dough to fix up the flaws) and besides, whenever I'm at the computer, my attention span drops from whatever it was irl to that of a hyperactive 6 year old's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blessingx Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Jesus. Now I'm thinking that $500 USB cable I won at CJ might not be worth $500. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted September 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I think this is my favorite one:Alan, Surely you jest? Chris Connaker Founder Computer AudiophileTranslation: Yes, I have an entire site devoted to exactly what you're criticizing in wild sweeping statements, so much so that I am dumbfounded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jp11801 Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 it's not entirely off base in that most usb dacs I have heard have sucked as have usb to coax converters. Computer audio has so many advantages but really in the USB DAC world the only true world class DAC I have heard is the Ayre. I had the cosecant and after a while I grew to really dislike the sound. Oddly on the mac I'd rather go optical than usb every dac I owned sounded better that way over a usb direct when available or through a usb converter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Q: Do USB cables make a difference? A: Emphatically yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jinp6301 Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Well they do! If you dont have any, your dac won't work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopstretch Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Well they do! If you dont have any, your dac won't work! Win win winny win win! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hungrych Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 I tested four USB cables: a stock “Brand X” strand that came with some peripheral I own (probably a printer), a Belkin Gold Series model ($44.99), a KimberKable ($50), and the dearly-priced Synergistics Tricon USB ($550). Of these, the generic and Kimber Kable cables were the least satisfactory—both reinforced USB’s synthetic quality. The Synergistics Tricon thankfully did not suffer that shortcoming, and was laudable in most every other way. However, the cable was notably bright. This trait can actually be an advantage in some applications. For example, if I owned a Bryston BDA-1 and were using its USB input, I would not be without the Tricon. Its top-end boost does indeed synergistically counteract the Bryston USB input’s high-frequency deficit, allowing instruments to breathe and strings to sound more like themselves. However, with more neutral associated equipment, such as the ARC DAC7 or the Bel Canto USB Link 24/96, the Tricon’s brightness exacerbated the shrieky nature of USB strings. The best overall USB cable I tried was unquestionably the Belkin Gold Series. A huge step up from generic cable, the Belkin was very nearly the equal of the Tricon in every particular, with the added benefit of being dead neutral. The fact that it can be had for less than fifty bucks is a great bonus. For now, the Belkin Gold is my reference USB cable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopstretch Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 OK, not USB, but I bet this little setup sounded quite nice for a "mere computer rig". 1. Magico M5 speakers: 2. (4) Pacific Microsonics Model 2 DA convertors to the Boulder 2010 preamp - 2 meter balanced wireworld silver eclipse 6 3. (4) Custom HD26 to dual wire with clock break out cables from the Lynx cards to the Pacific Microsonics Model 2 converters. 4. MIT Oracle MAX-Vee balanced interconnecting wire from the Boulder 2010 preamp to the Boulder 2060 Power amp. 5. 2 sets of MIT Oracle V1.1 MA speakers wires, (Magico M5 were bi-wired). 6. Noren Acousti-Lock g-Cab hush box for G5 Mac, (used to reduce the noise from the Power Mac G5). 7. Matan proprietary cable from his server to Pacific Microsonics Model 2 converter. 8. Symposium Acoustics - Precision Rack with 42" x 24" Ultra shelves. Unloaded, the rack weighed about 350 pounds 9. JVC RS20 video Projector. Computers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
some1x Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Was that the reference system in the TAS article? Why does he need four Model 2 DA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted September 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 (a) I don't think so; ( the question still holds -- WTF, dude, share! Fucking hoarders... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopstretch Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 It was the Computer Audiophile symposium rig. A Look At The Inaugural Computer Audiophile Symposium | Computer Audiophile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
some1x Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 ah ok. On a somewhat related topic, does anyone have experience with the Focusrite Saffire Firewire->SPDIF unit mentioned in the TAS article? It seems to be a promising alternative... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ojnihs Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 well i refuse to read the whole article, but i'm assuming what it boils down to is, don't use usb for audio? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 The Focusrite Saffire isn't really an SPDIF converter, its a Pro Audio card which happens to have an SPDIF-out. Its relatively cheap too ($200~ on ebay) and you can power it externally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
some1x Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 How well does it function as an SPDIF converter? Also, it seems to not exist on focusrite's site anymore. Is the Saffire Pro 24 supposed to replace it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 You'll have to google the rest yourself =P "Better than the Bel Canto USB link" doesn't say much nowadays... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted September 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 well i refuse to read the whole article, but i'm assuming what it boils down to is, don't use usb for audio?"Sounds bad", he says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digger945 Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 A comment after the article... "When I read text of my hard disk drive via USB words are not magically changed, HOT is not changed to HIT. The USB cable and protocol guarantee 100% error free data or no data at all. The DAC sees the EXACTLY the same set of digits whether USB, Firewire or S/PDIF or indeed any and all digital interfaces that uses error correction eg CRC checks that make sure that if the data is not 100% accurate it is re-sent until it is." I dunno. OT, I still hold to the idea that the major differences are within the dac chip itself, where the analog signal is born. Just like the dac within your system, if you don't have a good infant signal to begin with... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currawong Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Comments like that invite discussion of jitter, meaning that a bunch of blindly opinionated people, none of whom own an oscilloscope, let alone know how to use one, will start ranting like a bunch of Christians of different denominations thrown in a room together to discuss the religious symbolism of William Blake's poetry. Yes, I speak from experience about the William Blake bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.