Jump to content

The ultimate DIY? A Stax SRM-T2!


spritzer

Recommended Posts

I say using intuition and making a cut is the only way to go. You win some, you lose some - but it is always exciting. I think Kevin got a win.

Yep, I agree. Trying ultrasound would be cool though just to see if anything can be discerned. I wonder if the OB ward at the local hospital would mind me bringing in a hunk of wood?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ultrasound huh? I very much doubt it.

But i do have access to a newer vintage Siemens unit, will try tomorrow.

The stuff is just about as dead as can be, i doubt ultrasound would go thru

the wood more than .25 inch.

MRI... No way.. But i have a year old bruker imaging system with a 9T magnet,

can try that tomorrow too. If it does work, that would be very slick.

None of these systems have the resolution that i think would be necessary.

At least 100 lines per inch would be needed.

I'll walk around tomorrow with my woody and see what i can do. :D

Edited by kevin gilmore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ultrasound huh? I very much doubt it.

But i do have access to a newer vintage Siemens unit, will try tomorrow.

The stuff is just about as dead as can be, i doubt ultrasound would go thru

the wood more than .25 inch.

MRI... No way.. But i have a year old bruker imaging system with a 9T magnet,

can try that tomorrow too. If it does work, that would be very slick.

None of these systems have the resolution that i think would be necessary.

At least 100 lines per inch would be needed.

I'll walk around tomorrow with my woody and see what i can do. :D

If your machine has trouble penetrating it just needs moar power. Not touching the woody line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu/woodknob3.jpg

Tried to xray the wood block. Full power, 50kv @ 50ma. 5 minute exposure.

Absolutely nothing. Not even on the part that is 1 inch thick.

I did just get funded for a copper microsource which is about 10 times the bang.

Maybe one of these days i will sneak it into the APS...

Next up Nmr Imaging. (MRI for the rest of you...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i messed with the imaging NMR for about 4 hours on the block of wood.

Proton(high band): Absolutely positively NOTHING. 1 hour of scans at minimum stepsize.

Carbon(low band): Maybe even the slightest hint of NOTHING. 3 hours of scans at minimum stepsize.

If there is any signal, its buried in the mud. Maybe a few days of scans might generate something.

But i really can't do that. Except maybe over christmas or new years.

Will try ultrasound on monday.

My opinion is that if there was a way to see inside the wood, someone would have already found

it and published it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the problem is that this is an extremely dense wood. The problem with wood in general is that the density differentials are not that great so you need machines with very fine resolution. IMO of course.

I think that is probably the problem with sensing the inside of the block. LV is one of the half dozen wood species with a density greater than water - LV is around 1.3. It is also full of a type of gum which both smells like strong perfume when you work it, and makes it self lubricating (it was used for propellor bearings in steam ships for that reason). So it is very homogeneous, which makes it difficult to sense internal structure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bored and twiddling my thumbs waiting for semiconductors to arrive to fix the zapped T2, I thought I'd try to get a grip on what the actual signal level circuit was doing.

I've replaced all the current sources and 740V battery with ideal symbols. I've also left out compensation components, and some of the details of one or two current sources which I think are error handling, to prevent the thing blowing up if a tube goes down badly. I think the result shows the rather neat symmetry of the design, and the clever way in which DC voltage shifts are generated using the FETs and batteries to move the ground referenced input signal to -500V.

File is here http://www.tech-enterprise.com/tekstuff/T2deconstruct.pdf

Nice job on this Craig. This really makes it easier to understand the circuit.

I've got a question regarding the current feeding the EL34s. Seems like the T2 uses 10mA over 1,000V vs the BH at 25mA over 800V. How does the power effect the sound. I know everyone's been talking about the higher voltages impacting the slew rates, but what is the optimal power for driving O2s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, OK - I've now got the BH sorted, and truly awesome it is too. Takes a long time to warm up and get on-song - but what a song! Clear that the limitation is the source (TT CD64) and phones (lamdas).

Now on to repair and get the T2 working...

Nice work with the BH. Are you using the 2SA1968 or the new CCS? Get a pair of O2s stat, pun intended ^-^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice work with the BH. Are you using the 2SA1968 or the new CCS? Get a pair of O2s stat, pun intended ^-^

Cheers! I'll take some pics soon and post them somewhere. I managed to scare up enough 2SA1968's, but I wonder whether a T2 style anode current source could be substituted; but is that what is already in the BH-2?

Yeah - the next pocket evacuating exercise will definitely be O2's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much power the O2's need isn't really that straight forward. More power is always better but they also seem to "like" certain amplifier traits more then others which is why the small SS amps work better then the Stax tube amps even though the latter has more power.

The later BH has one 10M90 per tube instead of the six 2SA1968's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.