Jump to content

Buffalo32S DAC


morphsci

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

x2 on that. I fully support what the TWP guys do but there are times that I wish they would stick with a design for a little while longer and not immediately jump to the next, newerbetterfasterquicker model.

x3 on that. I'm looking forward to playing with one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naaman,

You mean with the new power supplies they were working on since Christmas right? Different than the IVY ones?

IVY is their active I/V and line stage.

The new power supply has been in development since WELL before Christmas. Russ canned it temporarily because it worked but didn't behave very well. Though by the sounds of it, the new Buffalo has fairly substantial on-board voltage regulation...... I'm not convinced that you will need anything better than the LM317 based regulators they currently sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the reason they went with the Ivy II on the initial B32 is because it gave them better #s since everything was on one board.

The counterpoint would be on option on the second B32 board that allows more flexibility in configuration.

Oh what to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just IVY built in right? I found that choice odd given all of the positive stuff that Russ had been posting about the Counterpoint.

Heavily updated IVY.

Counterpoint is a funny one. Russ likes it, but I think that the design is a bit finicky. He still seems to worry about turn off thump and DC offset.

I think the reason they went with the Ivy II on the initial B32 is because it gave them better #s since everything was on one board.

The counterpoint would be on option on the second B32 board that allows more flexibility in configuration.

Yep. We can't forget that there is a second DAC-only tweakers board coming that will allow the use of IVY II, Counterpoint, or any other I/V stage the user desires.

Oh what to do.

I'm sticking with my existing Buffalo :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Twisted Pear use separate analog and digital ground planes? It's hard to tell if they do. From the schematics of the Opus and original Buffalo it looks like the digital and analog grounds are shared?

NFI. I can normally follow a schematic OK, but the original Buffalo schematic bakes my noodle :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So $549.00 includes most everything needed, save for case and connectors?

Seems like a pretty decent deal to me. I'm assuming that if I desired multiple switched digital inputs I could add the S/PDIF 4:1 MUX/Receiver Module?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So $549.00 includes most everything needed, save for case and connectors?

You will need power transformers as well.

I'm assuming that if I desired multiple switched digital inputs I could add the S/PDIF 4:1 MUX/Receiver Module?

Yep, that is pretty much it. You should be able to power the MUX from the second channel of the LCDPS. You can also add optical and USB receiver modules with no worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFI. I can normally follow a schematic OK, but the original Buffalo schematic bakes my noodle :confused:

I think they're following Guido Tent's advice here:

http://www.tentlabs.com/InfoSupport/page35/files/Supply_decoupling.pdf

and not separating the digital and analog ground planes. This goes against pretty much every suggested layout by every DAC manufacturer, but Guido may still be right. I wish there was some good resource for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they're following Guido Tent's advice here:

http://www.tentlabs.com/InfoSupport/page35/files/Supply_decoupling.pdf

and not separating the digital and analog ground planes. This goes against pretty much every suggested layout by every DAC manufacturer, but Guido may still be right. I wish there was some good resource for this.

Might be worth your while to ask Russ in the Buffalo thread on DIY Audio for confirmation. I am sure that he will be more than happy to give you a definitive answer :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they're following Guido Tent's advice here:

http://www.tentlabs.com/InfoSupport/page35/files/Supply_decoupling.pdf

and not separating the digital and analog ground planes. This goes against pretty much every suggested layout by every DAC manufacturer, but Guido may still be right. I wish there was some good resource for this.

I'd take a look here.

DIYHiFi.org • View topic - Ground question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.