mirumu Posted March 12, 2009 Report Posted March 12, 2009 I read a commend on Slashdot comparing it to the distortion inherent of vacuum tubes. I hope no one argues in favor of mp3s someday like they argue in favor of the distortion of vacuum tubes. I'm firmly in the soft clipping camp without "sizzle". Those don't even seem comparable. Well it is Slashdot after all. I've been lurking Slashdot for over a decade now (without an account no less), and there's plenty of off-the-wall comments like that. Whenever someone there claims it's possible for something to sound better than MP3s they get jumped on because it goes against the house groupthink. Actually seeing someone admit MP3 is not perfect is a surprising step in the right direction for the place I'd say. I'd be amused to see a scientific argument suggesting that the brain filters out MP3 sizzle though.
morphsci Posted March 12, 2009 Report Posted March 12, 2009 I'd be amused to see a scientific argument suggesting that the brain filters out MP3 sizzle though. Not married eh?
Hopstretch Posted March 12, 2009 Report Posted March 12, 2009 Not married eh? The thread is about the death of fidelity. A little each day man.
Guest sacd lover Posted March 12, 2009 Report Posted March 12, 2009 This explains why some people like Ultrasones.
mirumu Posted March 13, 2009 Report Posted March 13, 2009 Not married eh? Haha, no. I have nothing against marriage, but the bachelor lifestyle has a certain appeal too. Then again I guess if I was being constantly nagged about spending too much on gear maybe those sizzling MP3s wouldn't sound so bad?
grawk Posted March 13, 2009 Report Posted March 13, 2009 The brain is designed to filter out noise. There are lots of examples of how this works.
Dusty Chalk Posted March 13, 2009 Report Posted March 13, 2009 i like the one on the bottom left.For you (I liked him, too):
Dusty Chalk Posted March 13, 2009 Report Posted March 13, 2009 Original(-ish) image Actually, I really like the pair of them.
NightWoundsTime Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 (edited) Does anyone remember the "fuzz" fad that was on head-fi a while ago? Don't know if it's still going on, might be, for all I know. Is that the same thing (as the "sizzle" mentioned in the article)? Yep Fuzzy's Fuzzbox or something of that nature, I think I had that in my sig for a while. And yeah it generally referred to a preference for tubes, vinyl, Senn headphones, or some similar lush sound. Grados were the anti-fuzz, if I remember the definition right. Original thread in its' original glory. http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/noobs-faq-about-fuzz-128819/ But then, it looks like Dusty's already seen it. Edited March 14, 2009 by NightWoundsTime
deepak Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 Actually seeing someone admit MP3 is not perfect is a surprising step in the right direction for the place I'd say. Because they choose a nerdier compression scheme like OGG?
mirumu Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 That's true. I had forgotten about the OGG obsession Slashdot has. There always seems to be a sizable portion of their user base who will apparently never buy any DAP without OGG support.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now