aerius Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 Can you smell stevieo through the internets? FET-A, as in feta cheese? Nevermind...yeah...boring day at work...
PFKMan23 Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 I'm sure that there's definitely form over function at work. However some of the aesthetic choices, are just ugly and could have been easily remedied by a lot of other readily available parts. Assuming the pics of the TTVJ website are of a production model, then it is a notable oversight. Form over function works, but still can look much cleaner. But then again maybe I'm not as attracted to the whole "built by Pete Millet" factor that some seem to be.
Dusty Chalk Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 Did I miss something? What is the price on this? When is it going up for sale?
Voltron Posted February 13, 2009 Author Report Posted February 13, 2009 The new TTVJ FET-A is what you seem to have missed. It went on sale recently for the intro price of $649, but the labor costs are going to raise the price a bit to $729 after the first 10. It is a nice little amp with a lot of power. I will be trying it head-to-head with the EC/SS tonight.
909 Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 (edited) Is it me .... or does this amp look both ugly and cheap? The volume knob really looks funky. dude, i felt the same way about the ttvj phonostage. plus i had serious noise issues because of the lack of the ground wire attachment. the small and plastic selector dial was godawful, imo. i wasn't 100% sure i had it dialed in where i actually wanted it and felt it couldn't be anymore cheaply done -- sad, but true. i couldn't even write a review given my poor listening experience with that product. Edited February 13, 2009 by 909
909 Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 (edited) Still, the TTVJ look is definitely utilitarian and nobody seems to like the volume knob except Pete Millett because it is used on the 307A amp as well! It was just something to get posted, but the amp does not look like it was built by Accuphase or Luxman. It is similar to my EC/SS in level of looks/style, although I keep asking Todd if there is some reason the DIY guys like Nate can come up with beautiful one-off cases and face plates like the recent Beta22 for tyrion. He seems to believe it would be too expensive and obviously believes the money is better spent on internals and design. it's probably because not only Pete, but Todd needs to get their points on the product -- everyone gets their cut, right? i've had a loaner ec-ss and the ttvj (phonostage mind you) chassis just seems overall less expensive to make. Edited February 13, 2009 by 909
MASantos Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 Now that's funny stuff. The unfortunate reality is that the 307A is an amazing amp and yet people don't buy them in nearly the numbers that they buy the shiny black boxes (in more ways than one) from Colorado. But oh mighty Voltron, if it looks good, it MUST sound goooooooooood!!! The "shinyness" reflects the sound waves directly into your brain!! It's sooooo obvious!!!
Voltron Posted February 13, 2009 Author Report Posted February 13, 2009 (edited) But oh mighty Voltron, if it looks good, it MUST sound goooooooooood!!! The "shinyness" reflects the sound waves directly into your brain!! It's sooooo obvious!!! You've figured it out, Manuel! That is the secret to the SP success. Well, that and the crack dispenser on the pricier models. Edited February 13, 2009 by Voltron
guzziguy Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 made-by-an-engineer aesthetic This may possibly be the best and most apt oxymoron I've heard in my life. Next to this, "military intelligence" makes bundles of sense.
PFKMan23 Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 Todd posted specs of the wall wart: The power supply is an ELPAC WM071-1950. It has a +/-15 volt output with .24 amps.
stevieo Posted February 13, 2009 Report Posted February 13, 2009 Coincidentally, I was thinking of your decrepit self today. Are you coming to CanJam in May? Are you going to fly into NorCal, hang out some in Marin, and then bus down with the crew? i never know from one day to the next. my plans always seem to change beyond my control.
ZephyrSapphire Posted February 14, 2009 Report Posted February 14, 2009 (edited) The output is in fact a pre-amp output even though the label says Line Out. I have mentioned this to Todd and I assume that he can correct it on later rear plate orders. i poop my pants! Edited February 14, 2009 by EdipisReks
Smeggy Posted February 14, 2009 Report Posted February 14, 2009 I'm sure it sounds great, but like others, I really, really wish Todd would let someone with eyes design the outsides!
n_maher Posted February 16, 2009 Report Posted February 16, 2009 I did my best to clean up the former mess that was this thread, let's see if we can't stay remotely on topic.
Voltron Posted February 16, 2009 Author Report Posted February 16, 2009 Well, on topic, I am sitting here in Park City, Utah listenin to the FET-A and EC/SS side by side. My source is an iMod with female dock and my Wyvern Audio AG-8 mini-RCA cable. Cans are Ed. 9 and HF-1. I am just getting going, so no impressions right away other than that these are both high-value amps. So compact and yet very satisfying.
Voltron Posted February 24, 2009 Author Report Posted February 24, 2009 Also posted on HF: The Intro Todd recently sent me a production model of the new TTVJ FET-A amp that he and Pete Millett have created. The amp went on sale this month for $649, and is available exclusively from TTVJ.com. Pete did the design of this fully discrete, Class A headphone amp and preamp, and Todd assembles and sells them. The FET-A has two pairs of RCA inputs and the volume-controlled preamp output on the back, and substantial Elpac wallwart provides the power. The front has a power switch, input selector, volume control and both
aardvark baguette Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Nice writeup. I take it you never had the impression of needing more power with some of the bigger headphones?
Voltron Posted February 24, 2009 Author Report Posted February 24, 2009 Thanks fellas. I did not feel the amp was underpowered with any of the cans I tried. I had to turn it up slightly more with the Senns and the most with K340s, but I don't think that I was ever past 10 or 11 o'clock on the volume.
luvdunhill Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 damn that is ugly explain yourself. Are you talking about Voltron or the FET-A?
kelvinz Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 explain yourself. Are you talking about Voltron or the FET-A? both?! I'm normally very tolerant of ugly functional devices but the FET-A would look better if he didn't bother branding/engraving it.
Asr Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Thanks for the review Al, seems like a very promising amp. Did you also listen with your Audio-Technica AD2000? I'd be interested in any impressions specific to that pairing (including gain). Also what aspects in particular are better on the Luxman P-1 vs the FET-A?
Pars Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 both?! I'm normally very tolerant of ugly functional devices but the FET-A would look better if he didn't bother branding/engraving it. We've had this discussion a couple of pages back. After making a similar comment (fugly, about the amp ), I agree that I would much rather have the money spent inside the unit than outside, as is the wont of some vendors. That I can certainly respect.
GPH Posted February 24, 2009 Report Posted February 24, 2009 Thanks for the well-written review, that's one amp I'd really love to try with the HD650.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now