Dusty Chalk Posted December 30, 2008 Report Posted December 30, 2008 I disagree that the e4c's, in particular, are easy to drive. These are one pair of IEM's that benefit from proper amplification.
ginsu117 Posted December 30, 2008 Author Report Posted December 30, 2008 I disagree that the e4c's, in particular, are easy to drive. These are one pair of IEM's that benefit from proper amplification. does the ae-2 have enough juice to drive them? they advertise that they can drive anything from a cheap 16 ohm pair all the way up to the highest end grado's
Dreadhead Posted December 30, 2008 Report Posted December 30, 2008 I disagree that the e4c's, in particular, are easy to drive. These are one pair of IEM's that benefit from proper amplification. The Ety ER4 are also firmly in that boat. The AE-2 takes them on with ease too.
guzziguy Posted December 30, 2008 Report Posted December 30, 2008 Is there any IEM or earbud that the AE-2 can't drive? I doubt it. I can say that an AE-2 easily drives UM-2 (IEM) and PK2 (earbud).
Dusty Chalk Posted December 30, 2008 Report Posted December 30, 2008 does the ae-2 have enough juice to drive them? they advertise that they can drive anything from a cheap 16 ohm pair all the way up to the highest end grado'sI'm not familiar with the AE-2, but from everything I've read...yeah, no problem.
Guest pjdowns Posted January 12, 2009 Report Posted January 12, 2009 Hey ginsu117, Sorry, I am only new here so sorry if I am butting in, but I am thinking about selling my Rega Ear. Let me know if you are interested via PM. Paul.
Dusty Chalk Posted January 12, 2009 Report Posted January 12, 2009 Saucesome. We need this as a smiley (or something similar).
Voltron Posted January 12, 2009 Report Posted January 12, 2009 Sad that things turned ugly after all the love he got in his introduction thread.
Guest pjdowns Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 and you posted in the thread instead of sending a PM because? I am sorry, but this was badly worded and ridiculous question, therefore I answered in a ridiculous manor!
Guest pjdowns Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Sad that things turned ugly after all the love he got in his introduction thread. I agree, I was hoping that this forum would be different to all of those moronic childish others that exist, maybe I was wrong... will have to wait and see!
Guest pjdowns Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 not a good answer. This was an excellent answer considering the moronic question !
grawk Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 It's definitely different, whether you like it or not.
Duggeh Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 I agree, I was hoping that this forum would be different to all of those moronic childish others that exist, maybe I was wrong... will have to wait and see! Have you read your signature?
Guest pjdowns Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 Have you read your signature? LOL... Yep and it is wonderful LOL .... I guess it may get certain peoples backs up but that was not it's intention ! P.
Sherwood Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 I agree, I was hoping that this forum would be different to all of those moronic childish others that exist, maybe I was wrong... will have to wait and see! Remarkably, this forum (and others, I am told) have things called "threads", streams of individual comments that share a loose relation. Those threads are archived for the curious reader to digest, and they provide the reader with a good feel of the tenor of a forum. Rather than "waiting to see", I would suggest a proactive approach of reading these archived "threads" and discovering, right here and now, whether you are a good fit for this place.
Dusty Chalk Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 I guess it may get certain peoples backs up but that was not it's intention !LIES!!!1! Troll alert...
Guest pjdowns Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 LIES!!!1! Troll alert... LOL ... it really wasn't. I use it on many different forums and have never experienced any issue previously ... In fact I find it quite amusing that it would cause controversy really, it is a relatively harmful statement. What's also amusing is that my primary computer is a PC and my second computer is a PC and my laptop is a PC. The only Apple Mac I have is my music server, which resides on an iMac. Paul.
Smeggy Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 It takes a lot more than that to cause anyone here to even notice, let alone cause controversy. Duggeh was merely pointing out the irony of your wanting less childishness while having a childish sig. And really, nobody here gives a flying fuck what you use or prefer computer-wise. We're an equal opportunity disser
Sherwood Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 We only care insofar as it prohibits you from using an Apogee Duet. We loves the duet here at HC.
Smeggy Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 We only care insofar as it prohibits you from using an Apogee Duet. We loves the duet here at HC. Oh, that's right. Rub it in why don't you. Fucking Mac fuckers....
Duggeh Posted January 13, 2009 Report Posted January 13, 2009 No Duet on the PC. But we get compensated with a second mouse button. It begins...
Recommended Posts