Dreadhead Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 I like your diet plan. You should write a book. I started the diet plan since then, though I did ride 20 miles the day I had the poutine. It's an easy diet: don't eat much. I lost 90lbs, ate a lot put back on 50 now I'll lose 60 (already off 15) and call that quits for a while unless I start gaining again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feckn_eejit Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Not as good as the best I've had in Montr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cetoole Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Cheese curds and gravy. YUM. I had poutine for the first time in years about a month ago and mouth is salivating at the memory Poutine was pretty awesome, had it for the first time in Montreal and Quebec this summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthsilverice Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Not as good as the best I've had in Montr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC_Shadow Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Well, according to the specs I can find, the Dodson is also 2.3 V RMS out (unbalanced). And based on some of the other specs I saw on teh interwebs, it seems that 2.3V is not inordinately high. However, I defer to the DAC experts on this one. Regardless, I did not find the need to volume match and the specs seem to provide support for the reason why. As an aside, I note that the DacMagic's output is 2.1V. Is a difference of .2V a significant amount in these applications? Random notes: Output Levels BDA-1: 2.3V unbalanced; 4.6V balanced ECD-1: 1.6V unbalanced; 3.2V balanced DacMagic: 2.1V unbalanced; 4.2V balanced DA217: 2.3V unbalanced; (can't find specs for balanced) Is it reasonable to assume that all balanced output will be 2x unbalanced output? Something tells me it's not that simple. My ECD-1 Vout is significantly higher than 1.6V, I would say it's at least 3.2V unbalanced (matachd to 0.1dB with another source that has 3.5V output) and probably 6.4V balanced. Are there different versions of ECD-1 (I remember reading the manual and thought to myself that's a high output)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n_maher Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Are there different versions of ECD-1 (I remember reading the manual and thought to myself that's a high output)? The ECD manual I've seen matches what The Monkey reported. http://electrocompaniet.no/pdf/manualer/ECD1_V1.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 I always thought the ECD-1 sounded hotter than those specs, but they are indeed the published specs. TC_Shadow, have you actually measured Vout? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Poutine this; poutine that.Literal FOTM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jinp6301 Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 mmm, poutine. I tried making it myself once. It makes me feel bad thinking how much oil, gravy and cheese I put in mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC_Shadow Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 I always thought the ECD-1 sounded hotter than those specs, but they are indeed the published specs. TC_Shadow, have you actually measured Vout? I will do that. Do I measure Vrms with 1khz wave at 0db? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Of course. Actually, I have no idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadhead Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Usually that's how it's done. At least according to a couple guys at various companies I spoke to about volume matching with a multimeter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC_Shadow Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 I always thought the ECD-1 sounded hotter than those specs, but they are indeed the published specs. TC_Shadow, have you actually measured Vout? I am reading my ECD1 tech spec from the manual. Output level (unbalanced) - 2.45V Output level (balanced) - 4.9V Max output (balanced) - > 14Vrms Output impedance - 40Ohm This corresponds to what I am hearing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 (edited) Very strange. Does your manual have a date or version/revision # on it? It would be great if you could scan it. Edited October 31, 2009 by The Monkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC_Shadow Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Very strange. Does your manual have a date or version/revision # on it? It would be great if you could scan it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted October 31, 2009 Report Share Posted October 31, 2009 Thanks very much. That would be more consistent with what I perceived when I had the ECD-1. Here are more specs from the manual on the website (the only one I've seen). I wonder if it's a typo or if the revised the unit. Analog stage Output level (unbalanced).............................1,6 V Output level (balanced)..................................3,2 V Gain (unbalanced).........................................1.6 X (4 dB) Gain (balanced)...............................................3.2 X (10 dB) Maximum output (balanced)..........................> 14 V RMS THD (1 V out, 1 kHz)........................................< 0.002 % Channel separation ( 1 V out, 1 kHz)...........> 90 dB Equivalent input noise....................................4 uV Output impedance..........................................100 Ohm Analog filter (-3 dB)..........................................75 kHz The title of this document is ECD1_V1 FWIW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 The Bryston BDA-1 was just named The Absolute Sound's "Digital Separate of the Year" for 2009. I recently sold mine because, while proficient, it just didn't have enough "life" or "musicality" or whatever that ethereal/elusive quality is that we all seek. And it reminds me that DAC reviews, just like everything else in our audio world, need to be taken with a large salt lick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 It might have been the best they tested but I can think of numerous DACs out right now that I much preferred based on the short term listen to your Bryston. By the way, let me know if/when you want me to drop by with a loaner DAC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltron Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 It might have been the best they tested but I can think of numerous DACs out right now that I much preferred based on the short term listen to your Bryston. By the way, let me know if/when you want me to drop by with a loaner DAC. Aren't you in a foreign land, monsieur? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 Nope, canceled. No more travel until my Vacation, in a different foreign land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltron Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 Vachement cool! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 Jeff, I'd love to check out the PerfectWave. I'll shoot you a PM to see what works for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted January 17, 2010 Report Share Posted January 17, 2010 Stereophile reviewed the BDA-1 this month. It was basically a rave, but a very superficial review that focused more on how the reviewer set it up than sonic impressions. Atkinson found some problems with the measurements, but I'm not sure what sonic impact they might have because he, of course, was less than clear on that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.