recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 I figured I would start a thread on the above amp I just picked up. A real beauty and sounds gorgeous. I believe this is the exact model that Kurt owned, Saint1 owns (from James3toe who got it from a user "Bob"), and Nightfall. One of only 5 that Craig built that was supposed to develop into an actual EC 2a3 line with the top of the line black rose being at the top of the lineage. By far the si2a3/45H is the best sounding of the different moth 2a3 iterations and may be slightly better than the ec2a3 version due to the external power transformer and inductor chassis. Power supply is all film caps as well, same output transformers. Now I need to get some 45's and I should be okay.
Asr Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 Congrats on being able to acquire that amp Ryan! I remember you wrote on Head-Fi somewhere that you used to own one and missed it so much, if a used one ever came up you'd jump on it again. Must be a great amp since it's from the hands of Craig Uthus, the man really seems to know his stuff.
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 man, that's a looker. i need to get an EC at some point. is it better than the ZD? i'm a bigger fan of OTL, but i am willing to be a transformer coupled believer I really think its more a preference thing, I have the ZD boxed up and that thing is way too complicated to put back in so I only had a chance to compare the two for about 2 hours or so. The ZD is slightly cleaner leading itself to a more neutral sound, whereas the moth has a more full, rounded sound. That is an exaggeration, there are both very close to the middle but one leans over this way, the other leans the other way, if that makes sense. With the grados I think the moth has the slight edge, the bass department is a bit more "developed." The ZD has the edge with the senns, which really just breaks down to the whole OTL vs. transformer coupled debate, as traditionally OTL's perform better with hi impedance and the transformers perform better with the low impedance. When I had the hd25 this was really obvious as the RS-1's sang and the senns sounded like crap with that amp. Considering I am a grado head and I have really learned to love the transformer musicality I am pretty happy. When I get some emission labs 45 I think that will be it.
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 Congrats on being able to acquire that amp Ryan! I remember you wrote on Head-Fi somewhere that you used to own one and missed it so much, if a used one ever came up you'd jump on it again. Must be a great amp since it's from the hands of Craig Uthus, the man really seems to know his stuff. Yeah for sure - this one is a bit different, and the differences lead themselves to a slightly better sound. The film caps in the power supply gives the sound a more organic, liquid presentation, my 1st moth s2a3 that came from JP#'s had electrolytic caps. The biggest thing is the external chassis that houses the power transformer and inductors. My 1st moth has a slight but noticeable background hum with grados. Low enough to be covered by the noise floor in most recordings but present enough to tick you off every once in a while. Most users wouldn't care and I truly didn't but it was there. This moth si2a3/45H is dead black. It also has 3 inputs and my old one only had 1. But the old one wins the looks department. The top plate was a painted black, a really nice looking paint like what you would see on a BMW or lexus, the newer si2a3 on to my model has the more generic looking powder coat finish. The original moth s2a3 also had some really random details as well. The chassis had thick aluminum plates that were polished, acid etched, anodized and gold filled. Inside are silver washers, brass plaques and more. You opened up the amp and these beautiful brass plaques were by the transformers with a detailed diagram showing how the change the output taps to match your speaker impedance, all laser etched into the brass. The port holes were machined out of solid aluminum, polished, and anodized, and the feet were machined out of aluminum bar stock. Only thing I see that carried over is the aluminum feet. Of course the original moth s2a3 retailed at 3500, didn't sell, developed into the si2a3 with some cutbacks was 1600 or so, and pretty much sold out with the review from stereophile helping out.
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 hmm, i love the warm neutral () sound of the ZD, myself. i've heard several of the Moth/EC prototypes (including the original ZD proto),which includes transformer coupled amps, and the production ZD is probably my favorite headphone amp. that is with HP-2s, btw. Yeah, I would say the moth is along the same lines, warm neutral:D I would say the moth is more warm neutral and the ZD is more neutral neutral:p
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 i think that amp looks beautiful. i'm willing to say more nice things about it if you'll pm me (or call me, do you still have my number?) with stories about 6moons Thanks - don't worry, one of these days I will get very drunk and do some drunk posting in the casino;D
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 Oh I know but the reference is just way too funny, I can understand where it comes from but the more I think about the oxymoronic nature of the term it makes me laugh a bit. Speakers are good - now I have something that can drive them:D Of course with 3 watts from 2a3's and 1.5-2 watts from 45's my options are somewhat limited:palm:
909 Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 congrats! i love the sound and looks of that amp. you know temptation is around the corner.
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 he sold them. Yeah, and get this, to the guy I bought the moth from:palm: And in most likelihood when he plans on selling them (sooner than later) I will probably buy them back:p BTW - man did I really underestimate those speakers. They had the sickest midrange not only for a single driver but could easily compete with much better stuff. The hi end was ok smooth but closed in and if you could deal with the lack of uber bass you were set. Very cohesive and could do the spooky realism touch the voices and instruments in front of you easily. ARrrgggg.
Akathisia Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 Congratulations on the beautiful looking (and hopefully equal SQ) amp. If I ever do a worthy DIY build, I will go for this sort of steampunk look that I love so much.
Akathisia Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 With the sectioned aluminum legs, plain switches and front portholes it makes me think of steampunk.
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 The above pics are of the original moth s2a3 and are more representative of the artistic nature that the moth gear went towards. Mine has much more of a prototype feel with the plain switches on top to switch between 2a3 and 45 usage, you should see the power supply, it is somewhat of a hack job, but I would say "classic" is a better adjective to describe the aesthetics of moth gear in general.
jeffreyj900 Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 Congrats... I remembered the recent Moth thread at the other place, you had stated that if one became available you would jump at it. Glad you were able to get it. My Zana arrived last Thursday. I am REALLY enjoying it! Jeff
jp11801 Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 the one that got away wish I had better pics to highlight the beauty
morphsci Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 Very Nice Ryan. You realize this means that it has to show up at Chiunifi-Redux! I have relatively recently become a big fan of Craig and I need to hear my HP-1's on the Moth and Zana Deux.
recstar24 Posted August 23, 2008 Author Report Posted August 23, 2008 Very Nice Ryan. You realize this means that it has to show up at Chiunifi-Redux! I have relatively recently become a big fan of Craig and I need to hear my HP-1's on the Moth and Zana Deux. For sure - it is an excellent combination with both amps. It is nice because mike G. still has his ZD in the area and the moth was able to stay here as well.
morphsci Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 For sure - it is an excellent combination with both amps. It is nice because mike G. still has his ZD in the area and the moth was able to stay here as well. Excellent! I may have something from EC by Chiunifi also
philodox Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 Congrats, I love the Moth Audio aesthetic.
Dusty Chalk Posted August 23, 2008 Report Posted August 23, 2008 Hey, that 300B is the one I was trying to remember for the low-powered amp thread, thanks! And Ryan -- nice! The Moth is one of the amps that I've lusted after even though I've never heard it.
Aura Posted August 24, 2008 Report Posted August 24, 2008 It's pure awesome Ryan. As if I needed another reason to come back up from school on Nov. 2nd .
recstar24 Posted August 24, 2008 Author Report Posted August 24, 2008 How about some internal pics Nothing too exciting. The key is that if you look at the amp, there is a "hood" that is underneath the base of the amp. The majority of the point to point wiring is underneath and routed through this area, giving it from glance a clean look. Other than that, you have the output transformers electraprint TM3K-B, polypropylene caps for the PSU, the tube sockets, its actually quite a simple enough circuit, or at least compared to the ZD circuit, is much simpler. I'm happy.
zippy2001 Posted August 24, 2008 Report Posted August 24, 2008 Congrats on the new acquisition, I love the look of the Moth products. I especially love the nitelite. Happy listening!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now