Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Thanks! What would the equivalent be for a crop sensor? A 35mm prime?

Yeah, 35mm on Canon crop sensor works out to 56mm. I've got a Canon 35mm f/2 and I really like the lens - but f/1.4 would be great (I just don't have $1400 for 35mm L lens).

Posted

So there's a lot of rumors running around about an update to one of the inexpensive primes (either 35mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.4) in September/October. I'd wait for that if you're using a Canon body.

Also Viveza 2 came out recently and I gave it a try. It's very handy and quick to add dynamic contrast/color saturation.

Posted (edited)
So there's a lot of rumors running around about an update to one of the inexpensive primes (either 35mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.4) in September/October. I'd wait for that if you're using a Canon body.

I'm not buying a new lens anytime soon, except perhaps a nifty fifty. Unless, of course, the rumored new 35mm actually comes out and is head and shoulders better than the 35mm f/2 (and keep the same cost or be cheaper, like the Nikon 35mm f/1.8).

Edited by Salt Peanuts
Posted

I think it will be around the same cost and much better since the 35mm f/2 is so old. I doubt it'll be in the same range as the the Nikon, though. Unless, like the Nikon, it's APS-C only (EF-S).

Posted

Nice dragonfly shot, Jeff. I've been meaning to take pics of them myself since our yard appears to be overrun by them, though they're never around when I go out.

BTW, what lens and what plant is that on the last pic?

Posted
So there's a lot of rumors running around about an update to one of the inexpensive primes (either 35mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.4) in September/October. I'd wait for that if you're using a Canon body.

Also Viveza 2 came out recently and I gave it a try. It's very handy and quick to add dynamic contrast/color saturation.

ooh, new cheap prime. i guess i should hold off buying any lenses for now

Posted
I think it will be around the same cost and much better since the 35mm f/2 is so old. I doubt it'll be in the same range as the the Nikon, though. Unless, like the Nikon, it's APS-C only (EF-S).

For my use, I've got no problem with 35mm f/2's performance (though a quiet USM focusing would be a plus). As for age, they're all old - the last non-macro or non-L prime was released in '95.

ooh, new cheap prime. i guess i should hold off buying any lenses for now

It still won't be cheap enough, methinks (probably in $400 and up range).

Posted

BTW, what lens and what plant is that on the last pic?

I believe that is a Yucca Plant.

The lens was the 35 f1.4L I believe but i tried several so I may be off there.

Posted
I believe that is a Yucca Plant.

The lens was the 35 f1.4L I believe but i tried several so I may be off there.

It was at 55mm f/14 so I'm guessing that 24-70mm again.

Posted

Any thoughts about the iPhone photos I posted the other day? I was wondering what you guys thought about the composition or framing, despite the sucky camera. The photos are unedited, and I might try to buy an app that could enhance them a bit.

Posted

Nice one Uncle Erik. :)

I had to grab the camera quickly before she ripped the improvised bandana off her head, but, ya know...such random flashes of inspiration and all that don't make for great photos, but still ...

web.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.