agile_one Posted December 31, 2012 Report Posted December 31, 2012 458 Italia, nice! Yes, but Green? That's just wrong. Nice shot, though, Ari.
Knuckledragger Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 The $2 million Leica lens you’ll never get to see.
Jon L Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 with 2x teleconverterEOSD1064 by drjlo1, on Flickr
Currawong Posted January 8, 2013 Report Posted January 8, 2013 Although he needs to be taken with a pinch of salt, have you read the Ken Rockwell "how to use ultra-wide lenses" guide? I found it quite helpful considering how little information I could find on these lenses elsewhere. Ooh, KR's article showcases a perfect example of something that looks better with a normal 37mm lens than with 14mm in the truck 2/3 of the way through - there is that pinch of salt.... Sometimes wider is just not the answer. Found it. I played with a friend's 14-24mm Nikon lens on my D7000 in Tokyo. Mad lens. The pinch of salt in that Ken Rockwell article for me is his talking about getting right up in the face of things. The point of having the zoom on that lens is so you don't always have to do that IMO. Mind you, I haven't tried that lens on an FX camera yet and my photography with that lens was for practical, not artistic purposes -- eg: standing in front of a table at a meet and capturing the whole thing without having to worry about getting a crowd of people out of the way.
oogabooga Posted January 8, 2013 Report Posted January 8, 2013 Although he needs to be taken with a pinch of salt, have you read the Ken Rockwell "how to use ultra-wide lenses" guide? I found it quite helpful considering how little information I could find on these lenses elsewhere. Ooh, KR's article showcases a perfect example of something that looks better with a normal 37mm lens than with 14mm in the truck 2/3 of the way through - there is that pinch of salt.... Sometimes wider is just not the answer. Just saw your post - I know KR's site (and yeah, some of his reviews need a pile of salt) but I don't think I've read that UWA article yet. Reading material for tonight's plane ride! with 2x teleconverterEOSD1064 by drjlo1, on Flickr That photo, and the sharpness, is incredible! Did you do much in post? It looks sharper than when I had my Nikon 2x (TC-III) with 70-200 2.8!
VPI Posted January 9, 2013 Report Posted January 9, 2013 (edited) Hero Comparison Really boring attempt at 720p 120fps slow motion. Edited January 9, 2013 by VPI 1
Jon L Posted January 9, 2013 Report Posted January 9, 2013 That photo, and the sharpness, is incredible! Did you do much in post? It looks sharper than when I had my Nikon 2x (TC-III) with 70-200 2.8!Just the usual amount of unsharp mask I apply to most RAW's, which is less sharpening than what camera body's jpeg engine applies.The new Canon 2x TC Mk III is a big improvement over Mk II in terms of sharpness, and one should shoot stopped down with TC's. My photo was shot at f/8.
mikeymad Posted January 11, 2013 Report Posted January 11, 2013 small tree - on the way to my car after work (taken with phone)... maybe wrong thread - but wanted to share.. 1
Knuckledragger Posted January 11, 2013 Author Report Posted January 11, 2013 This is definitely the right thread.
Jon L Posted January 12, 2013 Report Posted January 12, 2013 (edited) The new Fuji X100s looks very interesting!http://www.dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x100s Edited January 12, 2013 by Jon L
Salt Peanuts Posted January 13, 2013 Report Posted January 13, 2013 ^ Nice. I wonder when the improvements on X100S will make it over to their interchangeable-lens cameras - would make for a healthy competition over on mirrorless arena since Sony is still not really trying.
Jon L Posted January 13, 2013 Report Posted January 13, 2013 ^ Nice. I wonder when the improvements on X100S will make it over to their interchangeable-lens cameras - would make for a healthy competition over on mirrorless arena since Sony is still not really trying.A lot of the recent Fuji X-E1 buyers are a bit miffed that Fuji chose to release the X-E1 with the older sensor a few months before the new generation of bodies with the new sensors. I suspect the older X-Pro 1 will get the sensor update before the more recent X-E1.Anyways, not my dog..
Salt Peanuts Posted January 14, 2013 Report Posted January 14, 2013 And they would have been equally as annoyed if Fuji delayed releasing X-E1 until now, and maybe they haven't figured out how to work the sensor-level PDAF with different lenses as opposed to fixed one on X100S. In any case, this thing is looking like it will be giving Sony RX-1 run for its money.
Salt Peanuts Posted January 14, 2013 Report Posted January 14, 2013 (edited) The End of an Era: Steve McCurry and the Final Roll of Kodachrome Film Edited January 14, 2013 by Salt Peanuts
cutestory Posted January 16, 2013 Report Posted January 16, 2013 The new Fuji X100s looks very interesting! Yes. This may be the second camera I'm looking for...
Knuckledragger Posted January 17, 2013 Author Report Posted January 17, 2013 New 5D Mark III Box Arrives Full of Laminate Flooring, No Camera. Twice.
agile_one Posted January 17, 2013 Report Posted January 17, 2013 ^^^ That is seriously F'd up, and Dell should be ashamed of themselves if true.
nikongod Posted January 17, 2013 Report Posted January 17, 2013 New 5D Mark III Box Arrives Full of Laminate Flooring, No Camera. Twice. Not that I find humor in this guy's poor luck, but... After reading his story the banner ad at the bottom of the page is for wood flooring. It made me giggle. 1
crappyjones123 Posted January 18, 2013 Report Posted January 18, 2013 Is that story real? I find it very unbelievable. If true, it is quite sad.
Knuckledragger Posted January 19, 2013 Author Report Posted January 19, 2013 (edited) DRTV take a look at the Sony RX-1. Edited January 19, 2013 by Knuckledragger
Knuckledragger Posted January 20, 2013 Author Report Posted January 20, 2013 A guy who is the grandson of a famous Zeiss designer showed up on reddit's /r/photography last week. On Friday he put in an appearance on MFLenses forum. He inherited a number of lenses from his grandfather which are stupidly rare. One of which (the Distagon 25mm F/1.4) was known only to exist in plans. That is, there were no copies, even prototypes believes to exist. Porn: A few more here.
mikeymad Posted January 20, 2013 Report Posted January 20, 2013 man that 1.4/85 is a light bucket... (and the 2.8/180)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now