Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been lurking in /r/largeformat again.  As I've mentioned, that subreddit has cured me (mostly) of ever wanting to buy a view camera.  The time, money and effort most of the users put into what are frankly mediocre to bad results is staggering.  The other side of this coin is that the photographers who are good with large format are really good at what they do.  The larger the format, the bigger the delta.

Most of the following are 4x5  Some are scanned negatives, others are contact prints.  Most people don't seem to bother with enlargers anymore.

mZ9PVlY.jpeg

JCnKpzg.jpeg

KWN5IYT.jpeg

JhLyP3R.jpeg

aohx0uQ.jpeg

9pulFnW.jpeg

V7mlx07.jpeg

XGmrQHy.jpeg

KePl5IH.jpeg

CBRR5CR.jpeg

6QGXrf9.jpeg

WBMAjcZ.jpeg

Bork.

 

kL82NWp.jpeg

An accident, but an interesting one.  Potential album cover right there.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Posted

The following contains gratuitous cat pictures.  I've mentioned my friends Peter and Adele before.  Peter will be 88 this year.  He spent decades shooting 4x5 and doing some clever double exposures.  Peter doesn't use computers, so all of his work in is completely analogue and mostly not on the internet.  I'd like to help him scan some of his works, but that's a huge job.  Adele  (at the tender age of 84) is very much online, and even knows how to use her SMRT TV as a bluetooth device with her iPhone to stream video and photos.  Even I don't know how to do that, but in my defense, I hate fucking hate smartphones.  Peter and Adele's daughter, who's around my age, is as computer literate as any Gen Xer.  (She actually a VP of something-or-other in a cybersecurity company.)  All this is relevant because she recently moved to MV and brought her two cats. 

53952829934_0a48d7637c_k.jpg

This is Gertie, the more good natured of the two.  The only problem with her is that she's so friendly she tends to run toward me, making her a difficult subject to capture at times.

 

53952501306_3f6f04a614_k.jpg

This is Gidget.  She's much more mercurial, but quite friendly when she decides to be.

 

53952830014_c6c9472ed1_k.jpg

...and not when she doesn't!

 

53967591590_35603b3aee_k.jpg

Yesterday I caught Gertie sitting in a box.

 

53967714445_a31be34a4e_k.jpg

Of course I didn't manage to catch her with her eyes open and looking at me.  Solid Cat/10 interaction.

 

53967575669_0f31b099d5_k.jpg

Meanwhile Gidget checked the Golf's tire pressure.

 

53967595865_9f176a5923_k.jpg

Then she sauntered back to see why Gertie was getting all the attention.

 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Playing with the new Df and a Nikkor 35 f/2 AF-D at a nearby Art & Wine fest. Esmé and friend recreating lesser known naval battles as I layer on the post-processing. Highlights be damned. 

_DSC5727-NEF_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD - PanF 50 1.jpeg

_DSC5792-NEF_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD - PanF 50.jpeg

_DSC5750-NEF_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD - PanF 50 1.jpeg

_DSC5771-NEF_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD - PanF 50 1.jpeg

 

Edited by blessingx
  • Like 5
Posted
7 hours ago, Grahame said:

We haven’t been since pre-pandemic and with weekends filling it doesn’t look likely this one, but there’s still a small possibility. In so many ways I’m more a Dickens Fair-type, but two sides of the same illness. 

Also when did Gilroy and Hollister start being considered the “South Bay”? 
 

Posted
24 minutes ago, blessingx said:

Also when did Gilroy and Hollister start being considered the “South Bay”? 
 

Wishful thinking. Or real estate agent speak.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Voltron said:

Wishful thinking. Or real estate agent speak.

Maybe they were advised by the folks who renamed OAK.

The name of Oakland International Airport in California was changed to San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport on May 9, 2024. The airport's three-letter code, OAK, remains the same

https://oaklandside.org/2024/04/12/oakland-airport-approves-controversial-name-change

https://www.travelandleisure.com/oakland-airport-changes-name-san-francisco-bay-8647440

https://sfstandard.com/2024/04/10/oakland-airport-rename-ideas/

 

EDIT: What could possibly  go wrong?

https://sfstandard.com/2024/09/17/oakland-airport-renaming-confuses-travelers-sanfrancisco-says-in-lawsuit/

 

Edited by Grahame
Posted

Still need to do some color work, but here are a few snaps from a Lowrider event yesterday. Hassy 907x II 50c and 28p lens. 

2024-09-22 20.52.01 - 2024-09-22 19.16.37 - B0002642.jpeg

2024-09-22 21.06.24 - 2024-09-22 20.23.10 - B0002698.jpeg

FullSizeRender.jpeg

2024-09-22 21.06.40 - 2024-09-22 20.33.21 - B0002699.jpeg

2024-09-22 21.23.34 - 2024-09-22 22.20.34 - B0002766.jpeg

2024-09-22 22.02.52 - 2024-09-22 22.22.14 - B0002771.jpeg

Also starting to experiment with a NONS Instax Square back on a Hassy 500c, but really need to work on the exposure (the dynamic range is thin). 

IMG_7634-topaz-sharpen.jpeg
 

Finally and best, met up with @robm321 as we solved the world problems over sugar. 

IMG_7626.jpeg

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Short Documentary on Lee Miller

Before Lee

Also a new, small collection released as a tie-in. Can vouch for. 

FullSizeRender.jpeg

Edited by blessingx
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Fall colors. 6D mk1 this time. Much smaller show at a burger joint a couple blocks from home. 

_MG_1980-CR2_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD.jpeg

_MG_1990-CR2_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD.jpeg

_MG_2004-CR2_DxO_DeepPRIMEXD.jpeg

Edited by blessingx
  • Like 4
Posted

I´m doing a bit experiment. The R6 MkII can shot with Full Frame or like an APSC 1.6.

Maybe I´m doing something wrong but I think that in APSC I have more details (for example if you oversize at 180%) even though the sensor has less resolution in that mode.

I would like to do new tests but using the 90D (APSC 32MP) vs R6 MK II in APCS mode.

 

 

Mk6 II Full Frame.jpg

R6 MK II APSC 1.6.jpg

9L4A1629.JPG

9L4A1628.JPG

  • Like 4
Posted
19 minutes ago, jose said:

I´m doing a bit experiment. The R6 MkII can shot with Full Frame or like an APSC 1.6.

Maybe I´m doing something wrong but I think that in APSC I have more details (for example if you oversize at 180%) even though the sensor has less resolution in that mode.

It's possible that the lens is sharper in the center and softer at the edges. If you are using a smaller projection with the smaller sensor you could be seeing only the sharper part.

  • Like 2
Posted

That's a good point. I'll be reviewing all the documentation of the 100-400mm 4.5l (it´s my favotite lens) but I can add other lens too. 

Meanwhile: 

9L4A1684.jpg

9L4A1683.jpg

  • Like 5
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

A few cameras to avoid for those who hate hoarding equipment, they could become impossible to get rid of, especially after mounting unicorn lenses:
Fujifilm S5 Pro (+ 28/1.4E) unique filmic colour, CCD rules
AP1GczOUn9ItoJzCw7fRG9G8GI_NtU9a-bFQLrIH

D700 (+28/1.4E) still my favourite sub-300$ all-round stills camera
AP1GczOXsGj_5jLQG1hg-YFuTKx2Kc-rwRLFvMIN

My only gripe is that this amazing lens would be a bit odd on mirrorless (Z-mount needs a 28/1.4 asap).

Also saw the last remaining new silver Leica SL2 on sale, while still having some shiny old rangefinder glass - predictable result: first and last new Leica I've ever bought (hopefully...), another round with a camera that is incredible and infuriating at the same time. (75/1.4 Lux)
AP1GczMalJbGp1C5M4fK8Mnmxbn0SJC4Xk8o-EdCmp0F7UY7WGm7gy1Nms9PfVYvxK234UJ7TNO4R59yy05YuSZb3xx1fHXq7CQVMwmZ7cwxcLc9EMAiYPkbPyMa-YcZ1JSvu76ZzFjSar-eanDigDpuptxF=w1079-h720-s-no-gm?authuser=2

Had to sell the R6 Mark II + RF 28-70/2, but in all honesty, that (or an R5 with this lens) was the most sensible all-round package.
AP1GczPzoK1efHaDufqtWeoRegZPJQ3tbAQ8ZkmV

R8 works as a substitute for now, very nice compact carry around, especially with a superb RF 28 pancake.

Edited by padam
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.