Nebby Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Thanks for all the recommendations folks! She's looking for a cheaper P&S, so I think she's going to go for the Canon S110. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Expanding Man Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 Thanks for all the recommendations folks! She's looking for a cheaper P&S, so I think she's going to go for the Canon S110. You could probably pick up a used Fuji X100 for the same price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 (edited) wewt wewt. link to image - http://500px.com/photo/62198001 Edited February 26, 2014 by crappyjones123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmcmanus Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 No way in hell, does the nikkor 85/1.8 ever give me this. My anatomy professor just go the A7R while we were hanging out in his office a little while back. He cancelled his dinner plans because he wanted to play with the new toy since it got here 3 days early. The camera is freaking amazing. He wears mascara? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 The picture and the text that follows are unrelated 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agile_one Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 Congrats on the G.C. Sunset image recognition, cj. Both your landscape and portrait skills are mad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 Thank you Gene. Not sure I deserve that much praise but thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guzziguy Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 The picture and the text that follows are unrelated You mean like a campaign ad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 D600 owners rejoice. http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Service-And-Support/Service-Advisories/hs309y82/Technical-Service-Advisory-for-Users-of-the-Nikon-D600-Digital-SLR-Camera.html Wonder if the prices will start going up now. Apparently Nikon is even sending out pre paid shipping labels. Must have been a nasty lawsuit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agile_one Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 ^^^ about effing time, Nikon. Very late for many people, though. Nikon could have saved themselves a whole model intro (D610) and associated costs, and cemented customer loyalty if they stepped up to the plate 12 months ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 Talk about too little, too late. I'm glad they finally did it, but their behavior on that issue has been a joke. I'm still using my Nikon gear, but I wouldn't mind if I never bought more of it. On that note, I picked up a sweet deal on an XE-1 / 18-55 with RRS grip yesterday, and it should be a great camera for times when the big Nikon just isn't optimal to carry. Still undecided on the zoom lens, it certainly functions and feels nice enough, but it's a bit larger than I'd prefer on this body. Here's a downsized JPEG straight from the XE-1 in Velvia mode. They certainly get JPEG processing in a way Nikon never has: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shellylh Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 ^^^ about effing time, Nikon. Very late for many people, though. Nikon could have saved themselves a whole model intro (D610) and associated costs, and cemented customer loyalty if they stepped up to the plate 12 months ago. This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 There was a d700 on fm for $1100. D600s with brand new sensors are a amazing deal though. Free shipping to nikon too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 Any thoughts on Induro gear, particularly the ct213 tripod? I have been looking for a tripod but the gitzo and rrs stuff that people keep recommending is far too expensive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I've had both Induro and Benro tripods (same OEM), and they're quite well made and always worked very well for me. The CT213 should be extremely solid and well-made, and I don't think you'd go drastically wrong with one. Just make sure you're okay with the weight, folded size, and extended size, as those were the reasons I've jumped around between tripods over the years. Started with a very solid Velbon CF model that was a great extended size (sans center column), but 5lbs and rather long folded down with a head installed. Then I moved to a Benro CF "travel" style tripod (2690, I *think*), which packed much nicer but was still heavier than I wanted, and felt a little wobbly thanks to the 5-section legs. I then overshot towards light, with an Induro C-013 that was on closeout at Amazon. It hit my weight goals, at only around 3lb with head, and was steady, with only 3-section legs, but I often found it too short when extended. I'm currently using a Feisol 3342, which is, without question, my favorite tripod yet. It gets to a comfortable height with room to spare for use on hills, is still only 3lbs with a head, is rock-stable, and folds down small enough for me. The strength to weight ratio is the best I've seen, surely thanks to the Gitzo-style bowl-compatible collar. That aspect also allows for a wider ballhead while still enabling the legs to fold over it. The fit and finish is a modest step up from the Benro/Induro models, while being in the same general price class. My only real annoyances about the Feisol were having to buy the foot spikes separately, and that the included case isn't long enough to contain the tripod with the foot spikes installed. Anyway, think carefully about how/where you want to use the tripod, and how you'll get there, as well as how you need it to perform. The CT213 should perform excellently, but be quite long when folded (no fold-over legs), and >4lbs with a head, so not the friendliest travel companion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon L Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) I'm currently using a Feisol 3342, which is, without question, my favorite tripod yet.What ballhead do you like with your Feisol, for say a full-frame body + 70-200 f/2.8? Edited March 1, 2014 by Jon L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadhead Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I have a Gitzo CF tripod and Kirk Bh1 I don't use. Would you be interested in the combo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 What ballhead do you like with your Feisol, for say a full-frame body + 70-200 f/2.8? I'm using a Photoclam Pro Gold II, it's a nice compromise of size and performance. I previously had a PC-40NS that was also an excellent head, but I wanted the convenience of the clamp-connector on the PGII. I have used them with an 80-200 2.8, 200-500 5.6, and never had any issues with sag or unwanted movement (unlike the Giottos MH1300 I started out with). The RRS-BH50 is great, but huge/heavy, and I wasn't crazy about the egonomics of their smaller heads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 Here's a fun image from a couple of days ago, while I was torturing the XE-1's JPEG engine, so this is straight of the camera, with nearly every JPEG setting tweaked in one way or another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 The Feisol 3342 isn't available via Amazon Prime so it's out (I have a substantial gift card balance with Amazon that I would like to use). After reading some reviews, I ended up springing for the Induro CT213 and an Arcatech Ultimate Ballhead. Total carrying weight should come out to 4.5 lbs I think which is manageable. I don't see serious hikes or excursions like yours, Peter, any time in the near future so weight is not as big a concern for me but I didn't want anything so heavy that it just spent all its time in my apartment. The Gitzo gear while being reviewed better and carrying a lifetime warranty, was a bit too much to spend. I shall see if the whole thing is stable enough with the D800 and the two lenses I have. If so it stays. If not, I can easily ship it back to Amazon and spring for the Gitzo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadhead Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 No interest then? You could try out for the price of shipping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 I have a Gitzo CF tripod and Kirk Bh1 I don't use. Would you be interested in the combo? Out of curiosity, why did you stop using it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) Chris, I fear the Gitzo might be too expensive depending on the model which is why I didn't even approach you regarding it. Which Gitzo is it? Thanks for using the phrase, out of curiosity, Haj. Now I can't use it. Edited March 1, 2014 by crappyjones123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted March 1, 2014 Report Share Posted March 1, 2014 The Feisol 3342 isn't available via Amazon Prime so it's out (I have a substantial gift card balance with Amazon that I would like to use). After reading some reviews, I ended up springing for the Induro CT213 and an Arcatech Ultimate Ballhead. Total carrying weight should come out to 4.5 lbs I think which is manageable. I don't see serious hikes or excursions like yours, Peter, any time in the near future so weight is not as big a concern for me but I didn't want anything so heavy that it just spent all its time in my apartment. The Gitzo gear while being reviewed better and carrying a lifetime warranty, was a bit too much to spend. I shall see if the whole thing is stable enough with the D800 and the two lenses I have. If so it stays. If not, I can easily ship it back to Amazon and spring for the Gitzo. That should be a great setup for you. I've seen a lot of great comments about that head, never used one, though. Please let me know if you can find a way to make it NOT "stable enough" for a D800, and no, raising the center column in hurricane-force winds doesn't count Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.