Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Amazon has them back in stock so I grabbed one and a few for gifts and that EF converter. Need to dig up some of my old Canon lenses.

Which kit did you go with?
Posted

What about Canon's DPP (with lens corrections) or Adobes DNG converter?

 

I actually like DPP, but I have many different Photoshop plug-in's that I need to use, so I would have to open the RAW in DPP, then use the "transfer to photosop" function, then use the plug-in's.  I already do this sometimes, but it takes much longer time than opening the RAW in PS to begin with, and having both DPP and PS open slows down my computer.  Not something I would want to do for every EOS-M file..

 

The more I think about it, if I ignore the low price of EOS-M, I KNOW I will not be using the EOS-M with EF lenses/adapter after the initial curiosity wears off.  Then there is really no reason to stick with Canon for the "pocketable" aps-c.    Since I kind of hate that old Canon 18 MP sensor's IQ relative to other companies' sensors, e.g. Fuji, Sony/Nikon, I think I'll pass on the EOS-M.  In the end, it'll be worth it for me to pay more $$ for a pocketable camera I can get excited about..

Posted

Amazon.

 

The focus is really quite slow, even with the latest firmware. Not terrible but I would not expect 100% success on shooting things that move.

Posted

I certainly like the feel of the camera better than the S100, which I always thought was too small, but I do miss the controls of the S100.

 

I do not know where my S100 is but I will try to compare focus speed on the two, I think they are pretty similar.

 

The touchscreen does seem to work well.

 

I will try to take it out this afternoon to really try it out.

Posted (edited)

Some more samples.  For $300 I cannot find a whole lot to complain about.

 

sample6-X2.jpg

 

sample11-X2.jpg

 

sample9-X2.jpg

Edited by VPI
Posted

Most of them are gifts.  They will just have to suffer.  I should have a 22 f2.0 at my office tomorrow.

  • Like 1
Posted

I do not know why the 18-55 kit shows up as being more expensive than the pancake kit since both lenses sell for the same price.  I definitely don't like working with such a slow lens.  Who wants a whole flower to be in focus when the D800 and 35 f1.4 can give me such nice blur?

 

sample12-X2.jpg

Posted

Nice focus on both.

 

I do not know why the 18-55 kit shows up as being more expensive than the pancake kit since both lenses sell for the same price. 

 

 

Beach and Ritz are $50 difference in lens prices. J&R is $30. Some like Adorama have a sale on 18-55 only that distorts the difference. 

 

Will be interested if you see a difference in focus speeds between the two lenses.  I ordered from Amadora because Amazon was out of stock. Then after sending a shipping notice Amadora sent a backorder notice and removed the item completely from online catalog.  :unsure: Then Amazon showed back in stock, so cancelled/reordered. We'll see what arrives Friday. 

 

Posted

You know what I haven't done in bloody ages, like this entire calendar year?  Post any photos to this thread.  Here's a random sampling of what I've been up to for the last 6 months:

 

NYE Fireworks on the Edgartown Harbor, from the Harbor View Hotel:

8338048487_2859016049_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 (with a broken AF motor) @ F/16.0, 4s, ISO100.

8369797348_1d0c864abf_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 @ F/16.0, 5s, ISO100.

8334632404_3d79cdbd1a_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 @ F/14.0, 5s, ISO100.

8343105926_c52b55414d_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 @ F/16.0, 5s, ISO100.

8387885631_f2859d68c0_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 @ F/16.0, 5s, ISO100.

8365275416_844921d815_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 @ F/16.0, 5s, ISO100.

8347697473_ea667912da_b.jpg

30D & 35mm F/2 @ F/16.0, 5s, ISO100.

8335993451_a4204d8a15_b.jpg

Jernegan Pond on new year's day. ID-modified 5D & EF 50mm F/1.4 @ F/4, 1/400, ISO100, +2/3EV.

8416209882_95804f217c_b.jpg

Edgartown harbor backwaters. IR 5D & 17-40L @ 40mm, F/7.1, 1/125, ISO100 +1/3EV.

8365878751_49820bb32a_b.jpg

The Edgartown ghetto. IR 5D & 17-40L @ 17mm, F/7.1, 1/100, ISO100 +5/3EV. Infrared metering is Looney Tunes.

8357898987_e0278895ff_b.jpg

The same area in plain old visible light. S95 @ 22.5mm, F/4.9, 1/1000, ISO250.

8357057572_5e20e92ee5_b.jpg

The Edgartown Public Library and its tree. IR 5D & 17-40L @ 17mm, F/7.1, 1/100, ISO100 +4/3EV.

...and that's just January. I'll be back later with more.

Posted

I guess this is the way new Canon EOS-M lenses ship?  Nothing in the plain white box but the lens in bubble wrap.

 

22mm%20%281%20of%201%29-XL.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.