The Monkey Posted February 20, 2008 Report Posted February 20, 2008 I'd appreciate impressions from those of you who have heard a balanced HF-1 compared to a balanced RS-2 or RS-1. Basically, I'm trying to decide if I want to move on from my HF-1. Quote
The Monkey Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Posted February 21, 2008 I'll take SE impressions, too. Quote
postjack Posted February 21, 2008 Report Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. Quote
postjack Posted February 21, 2008 Report Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. also, while the RS-1 is slightly more resolving, the HF-1 has less of an upper midrange hump. I imagine this is why grawk & others prefer the HF-1 to the RS-1. Quote
recstar24 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. Damn, talk about breaking it down to the simplest level, couldn't have said it better myself. Very eloquent oh kind sir Quote
The Monkey Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Posted February 23, 2008 I've been listening to my HF-1 the last few nights and to me it sounds good, but a bit congested, which is frustrating. Quote
postjack Posted February 23, 2008 Report Posted February 23, 2008 I've been listening to my HF-1 the last few nights and to me it sounds good, but a bit congested, which is frustrating. RS-1 might be right up your alley then. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.