The Monkey Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I'd appreciate impressions from those of you who have heard a balanced HF-1 compared to a balanced RS-2 or RS-1. Basically, I'm trying to decide if I want to move on from my HF-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I'll take SE impressions, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. also, while the RS-1 is slightly more resolving, the HF-1 has less of an upper midrange hump. I imagine this is why grawk & others prefer the HF-1 to the RS-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recstar24 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 SE, HF-1 has more bass, RS-1 has more space. Damn, talk about breaking it down to the simplest level, couldn't have said it better myself. Very eloquent oh kind sir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monkey Posted February 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 I've been listening to my HF-1 the last few nights and to me it sounds good, but a bit congested, which is frustrating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postjack Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 I've been listening to my HF-1 the last few nights and to me it sounds good, but a bit congested, which is frustrating. RS-1 might be right up your alley then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.