humanflyz Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 So I just read Darth Nut's review of the O2s, and wow, it is without a doubt the best review of a piece of audio equipment I have ever read, hands down, no contest. What really blows my mind is how conceptually clear the review was. He basically articulated a coherent conceptual framework for audio review and applied it to an actual piece of audio equipment in a consistent, logical manner and backed it up with supporting evidence. It combines both his subjective perceptual experiences and his concepts in a way that shows the reader his thought process. Honestly this should be required reading for anyone interested in describing audio equipments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeggy Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Yep, very good review indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fungi Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 A link would be cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 It really is the best review ever written. I think I have it in pdf form and I'll try to find it. Edit: Found it... The O1 vs. O2 comparison is right on the money as well. Read it here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granodemostasa Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 that review was like the 3rd thing I read on head-fi back when I joined... it is one of the founding documents of the hobby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeggy Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Bugger me, it's even longer than I remembered, and I remembered it being very long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Bugger me, it's even longer than I remembered, and I remembered it being very long. It sure is. I need to fins a SRM-T2 one of these days... \ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint.panda Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 that review was like the 3rd thing I read on head-fi back when I joined... it is one of the founding documents of the hobby. Same here, really educational review and superbly written. I especially liked the soundstage / headstage differentiation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeggy Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 It sure is. I need to fins a SRM-T2 one of these days... \ Good luck with the Kings ransom on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Good luck with the Kings ransom on that one. Thanks, I think I'm up for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastergill Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Never liked this review, too much intellectual masturbation bullshit from a dude who seems to have a very inflated opinion of himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrice Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Never liked this review, too much intellectual masturbation bullshit from a dude who seems to have a very inflated opinion of himself. I've read that review as well, and did not sense any pompousness or inflated ego. Quite the opposite really. The reviewer thought a great deal about headphones and the specific issues revolving around how they reproduce sound. He then came up with his own methodology and terminology to explained those issues in as clear and concise a manner as possible. I think our hobby needs more of this. Right now there is no real centralized authority on headphones like the speaker world has. Sure the happy, "it's good if you like it" attitude makes us all feel good about our gear, but if we're to move forward as a hobby we need more well-thought out reviews to help define and give shape to the language and concepts needed to describe what we hear and how well a piece of equipment recreates sound. It would help give our hobby more legitimacy; which is something we are lacking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Never liked this review, too much intellectual masturbation bullshit from a dude who seems to have a very inflated opinion of himself. This is crap IMO. The review is spot on and is a benchmark against all others should be judged. The reviewer has been in the headphone game longer then most (search Headwize for his posts) and has a clear understanding on what makes them tick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Yeah this is a hella good review. I've read it a few times. One of the things that convinced me to get a Stax SR-404...unfortunately it was no SR-007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Skimmed it and saw no rating out of 100%, or numerical ranking compared to other headphone. Thumbs down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Skimmed it and saw no rating out of 100%, or numerical ranking compared to other headphone. Thumbs down LOL!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recstar24 Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 He has a nice way of articulating such a subjective thing. I really enjoyed reading Carlo's posts and reviews. I know he rubbed people the wrong way but I just felt he was so right on with a lot of his impressions, I liked his directness and clear cut No BS way of presenting things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catscratch Posted February 1, 2008 Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 That review should be mandatory reading for anyone with an interest in reviewing or discussing audio components. It's a terrific example of clear and organized articulation of a very abstract and difficult topic. But, it's going to go way over the heads of the average public, especially because of the length. It's a case of the review being much better than the audience. People don't want an organized discussion filled with novel concepts - they want a short largely monosyllabic blurb with simple numerical ratings and lots of "lawlz" and "roflcopter" thrown in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jinp6301 Posted February 1, 2008 Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 LOLERZ ROFLCOPTER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiWire Posted February 1, 2008 Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 It's a great review. I also like the fact that it took him 4 years to summarize his findings. There are way too many "impressions" out there, mine included. I prefer real reviews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aerius Posted February 2, 2008 Report Share Posted February 2, 2008 I've pretty much accepted the fact that I can't write reviews for beans, I worked on a Senn 580 vs. Grado 225 review on & off for around 2 years before giving up and putting it away. Impressions, no problem, I can crank those out in an hour or two at most but I have issues with long term reviews, I just don't know what the hell to put in them without making it sound like the pretentious garbage found in Stereophile or TAS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duggeh Posted February 2, 2008 Report Share Posted February 2, 2008 Its the best of the best of the best. Whatever you consider the best book ever, War and Peace, Lord Of The Rings, Catch-22, the Bible. Its that. I can go on at length and I do my best, but I cant touch that review. I don't think I ever will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted February 2, 2008 Report Share Posted February 2, 2008 I've pretty much accepted the fact that I can't write reviews for beans, I worked on a Senn 580 vs. Grado 225 review on & off for around 2 years before giving up and putting it away. Impressions, no problem, I can crank those out in an hour or two at most but I have issues with long term reviews, I just don't know what the hell to put in them without making it sound like the pretentious garbage found in Stereophile or TAS. Ditto. I've been working on a review of the whole Lambda line for over a year now and it's mostly been an overview of the history and what changes were made with a few impressions thrown in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elephas Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 If darthnut shows up in this thread, I'll give him my HeadAmp Aristaeus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkless Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 If darthnut shows up in this thread, I'll give him my HeadAmp Aristaeus. [me=darkless]tries to figure out a way to make "darkless" into "darthnut" [/me] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.