HiWire Posted December 29, 2007 Report Posted December 29, 2007 I finally got my amp back and running, so I'm going to start posting my impressions of my new CD player. I still have my Panasonic SL-S160 PCDP as a reference, but I'll probably stop making comparisons after a while. Before I mention anything else though, I noticed the output power is much higher than my Panasonic's - this is logical because of the differences between portable and home players' power supplies and output sections. Anyway, the Arcam sounds much louder at the same level on the volume dial - I'll probably have to turn it down when I listen for longer periods. I've only listened to the first three tracks of Jane Monheit's Taking a Chance on Love on both players so far - I'll listen to a greater variety of music and at greater length when I get back from dinner and the gym tonight. Also, I'll post a pic of my incredibly ghetto audiophile phurniture. The first things that I am noticing are increased frequency response, improved soundstage, and better flow. Bass was immediately deeper and tighter, and highs are more extended. In terms of soundstage, the perceived space is wider and deeper - also, I can hear accompanying instrumentalists far more clearly now. This is somewhat related to flow - the CD36 makes Jane Monheit's voice more realistic (fuller-bodied, smoother, and more nuanced) while allowing several instruments to stay prominent at the same time. I have noticed that lower-end players have difficulty handling complex arrangements while better players can keep up with a layered sound.
aerius Posted December 29, 2007 Report Posted December 29, 2007 I probably missed it somewhere and can't find it, but which amp are you using?
HiWire Posted December 29, 2007 Author Report Posted December 29, 2007 I'm using the Headsave Classic - I think it's the third revision, and one of the last home amps that Norm made. The ground op-amp blew out, so I haven't been able to listen to my HP-2s for about three weeks. Norm replaced the dead OPA627 with an OPA227, and I'll be ordering an OPA627 right away.
HiWire Posted December 29, 2007 Author Report Posted December 29, 2007 I've listened to the rest of Monheit's album. There is definitely more attention given to emotional nuance and the accompanying instruments are better balanced against Jane Monheit's voice. In Guns N' Roses' Appetite for Destruction, the guitar and vocals flow along quite well, but the CD36 doesn't get down and dirty or rough-sounding like some other CD players. I'm hoping that it improves in rock performance with burn-in. Rhythm is good, but the Arcam player never loses its polish and poise. My first CD, My Life with the Thrill Kill Kult's 13 Above the Night, fared better. The mixture of goth electro-rock and disco techno-house was irresistible and the densely-mixed lo-fi sound was appropriately funky and swinging. The real eargasm/revelation/epiphany happened with Anna Netrebko's Sempre Libera. The incredible quality of Netrebko's voice and the superb recording of the orchestra and her accompanying vocalists made all my other discs sound like crap. The compelling lyricism, richness, and musicality of the performances (La traviata and Gianni Schicchi) proved that the player earned its money's worth.
socrates63 Posted December 29, 2007 Report Posted December 29, 2007 Have you read TNT Audio's review of the FMJ CD36? Care to provide your take on the reviewer's comments in general?
HiWire Posted December 29, 2007 Author Report Posted December 29, 2007 I'm still in the burn-in phase, so it's probably too early to tell. I don't think the reviewer's Dynaudios were a good match for the Arcam - I would certainly pair them with something a bit warmer. Bass and rhythm are just fine, though, in my system. I don't find the CD36 to be particularly analytical, but it does sound a bit more delicate than other players - music is flowing rather than forceful. The overall sound is full-bodied, but neither forward nor laid-back. I'm assuming that the treble will soften slightly over time or that I'll adjust - it's a totally different listening experience from my portable, with an expanded frequency response and outstanding dynamics.
HiWire Posted July 9, 2009 Author Report Posted July 9, 2009 I have crossed the Rubicon. This weekend, I was listening to Massive Attack's "Mezzanine", a recording I know well, when I realized I was hearing things I hadn't heard before. I'm talking about little details that were compressed or previously over-lapped in my headspace - background sounds, etc. expanded and came into focus. What was previously, by comparison, flat and simple became lush and complex. It was even more shocking because this album had just been preceded by Kylie Minogue's "Fever", which sounded normal, to my ears. At first, I thought something might be broken, since the last time I had a radical change in sound was when the ground channel cut out on my headphone amp. I've been listening to my player sporadically (2 hour listening sessions, averaging about once every 2 weeks) since I got it in December 2007 - I guess it took this long for the player to finally burn in. I'm looking forward to re-listening to all my music now that the Arcam's output is finally reaching it's true potential. I have since listened to Sophie Milman's "Take Love Easy" and Dire Straits' "Band of Brothers" - Milman's jazz arrangements increased in space and detail slightly and Dire Straits' masterpiece was rich and atmospheric, just as they had intended.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now