Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That is stupid. The people who don't care about the sound quality of their iPod don't care about sound quality anyway. If anything DAP's have increased the amount of audiophiles because of the high-end larger headphone market...

Posted

TOMMASINI is crazy. If the guy could pick a side, that would be nice. He first says how he has vinyl, which is good, then says how they are hardly a luxurious sonic experience. WTF? He also mentions later that vinyl is "making a comebacK". What kind of useless crap is that? What person who enjoys music doesn't already know that? Then on to on again off again about digital. Seriously. Has this guy ever compared the two? I can confirm he has not just by reading.

The whole article is just like vomit: regurgitated crap that should not be digested.

What a fool.

Posted

... He also mentions later that vinyl is "making a comebacK". What kind of useless crap is that? What person who enjoys music doesn't already know that? ...

Not everyone needs purity to enjoy music...

Posted

Typical whining about how the sky is falling and those darn kids just don't get it anymore. Maybe they said the same stuff about cassettes and eight-tracks, I just wasn't listening.

I am much more concerned over the slashing of music education in public schools and the like, but that's me.

Bah, I need my coffee.

Posted

This are still attempting to shape public opinion. So read and be brain washed. It is much like a nation's tax policy, it really isn't about revenue but public policy shaping.

Posted

Good question but it is not surprising they did so. The media botches a lot more than just the state of Hi-Fi.

The majority of people listening to music don't listen; they multitask their listening along with workouts, driving, work, studying, posting to websites ;) etc. In those environments why would perfect reproduction be a requirement to the majority of consumers? If the majority of people can't sit down to read a book uninterrupted why would music be any different to the masses?

Posted

The majority of people listening to music don't listen; they multitask their listening along with workouts, driving, work, studying, posting to websites

Yikes! I forgot about that. I worked with someone who believed he loved music, but he rarely paid any attention to it, save for the loud bits. Oy.

Yep. I agree with you. Sad news. :-\

Posted

Yikes! I forgot about that. I worked with someone who believed he loved music, but he rarely paid any attention to it, save for the loud bits. Oy.

Yep. I agree with you. Sad news. :-\

It's not sad to listen to music while doing other things. What's sad is only having music in your life when you have time for music exclusively. Music IS life. You don't need to concentrate on music all the time.

Posted

It's not sad to listen to music while doing other things. What's sad is only having music in your life when you have time for music exclusively. Music IS life. You don't need to concentrate on music all the time.

Yee haw. Thats what office systems are for, right?

And portables, and bedrooms, and speakers that look like rocks...

It can't be the soundtrack if the hero isn't doing anything while it plays.

Posted

It's not sad to listen to music while doing other things. What's sad is only having music in your life when you have time for music exclusively. Music IS life. You don't need to concentrate on music all the time.

Exactly. Half my listening time is when I am at the computer. What the hell is so important on here that I can't pay attention to music anyway?

Posted

Exactly. Half my listening time is when I am at the computer. What the hell is so important on here that I can't pay attention to music anyway?

The point was that the masses rarely (if ever) listen to music to the exclusion of other activities. If you aren't actively listening an ipod/imod, atv, etc. is fine for the task--who needs audiophile grade components for that? An occasional sour note isn't much different than a door slamming/AC kicking on/dog barking/IM message/phone call.

One can speed-read through a literary work but doing so overlooks the nuances.

I listen at work and get interrupted all day by co-workers :) Using audiophile grade components in that environment would be a waste.

Posted

To an extent I agree with you, but on the same regard, one does not have to give 100% attention to the music to appreciate the added fidelity. I very rarely ever JUST listen to music, but I can sure tell when a tube is going bad, and I can enjoy the sound of my VTG.

Your argument states that as I am sitting here typing, with my VTG on my head.. I will not be able to enjoy the sound fomr my headphones, so I should just be using the onboard sound to some v6's?

I agree that maybe an imod is overkill if the user is not even pauing attention to music. However, who are you to say that as I am walking around, I am not actively listening? Because I will hear the occasional bus drive by, I should not use high quality gear?

Maybe you should stop preaching about what people should spend their money on, and worry about your own self. You have found a happy medium for your listening habits, leave it at that.

Posted
Maybe you should stop preaching about what people should spend their money on, and worry about your own self. You have found a happy medium for your listening habits, leave it at that.

:doghuh:

My intent was not to instruct how you or anyone else should listen to music. Everyone should do whatever makes them happy. I offered up a comment on SQ and the masses and somehow people read into it that I feel active listening is the one true way to listen to music. WTF, nowhere did I preach about what people should spend their money on. You should reread my posts with a clear mind.

Posted

The majority of people listening to music don't listen; they multitask their listening along with workouts, driving, work, studying, posting to websites ;) etc. In those environments why would perfect reproduction be a requirement to the majority of consumers? If the majority of people can't sit down to read a book uninterrupted why would music be any different to the masses?

Seemed a bit preachy to me.

Posted

Seemed a bit preachy to me.

No, I distinctly remember that I wasn't wearing a collar when I wrote that. Sorry for your thin skin ::) It's just a personal observation over time regarding people's listening habits. YMMV.

Posted

No, I distinctly remember that I wasn't wearing a collar when I wrote that. Sorry for your thin skin ::) It's just a personal observation over time regarding people's listening habits. YMMV.

hand.jpg

my mileage -does- vary, which is why I think you're full of it.

Posted

I think he's full of it because the story changed. He said it was sad a coworker listened to music while he did other things. Something in that is sad, but it's not the coworker who likes music...

Posted

:doghuh:

I think bhjazz brought up the sad coworker bit. I just said I got interrupted by co-workers as I listen.

My bad, I get all you preachy newbies confused in this thread. :)

Posted

my comments have gone horribly wrong....

:kitty:

No, I often do other things while listening to music. More now than even just a few years back. I can definitely set a soundtrack to most any task; my previous life as a dj makes it easy.

back to SQ.

Every time I read an article in a mainstream media about sound quality, it inevitably gets the whole thing wrong.

I just wish they would try to teach someone who likes music that there might be more to it than just the sound of an iPod with it's extra-sepcial white headphones.

if you want that sort of thing.

if you enjoy/dont enjoy sound quality

if you listen with dedication or with no focus at all on your treadmill

aw crap...you guys are gonna get me to drinkin again. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.