kevin gilmore Posted May 8, 2017 Report Posted May 8, 2017 I can definitely do a I/V converter with a discrete cfa amplifier with the current input directly feeding the emitters of a complementary input stge. 3
DefQon Posted May 9, 2017 Report Posted May 9, 2017 I've been looking at alternative output/IV stages for the AD1853. Balanced by design and I have a circuit that is using the default output circuit on the Analog Devices datasheet for the DAC IC. Kevin what do you think about a output design using something similar to Borbely's JFET output circuit in place for an I/V converter?
nopants Posted May 9, 2017 Report Posted May 9, 2017 On 5/6/2017 at 5:29 AM, kevin gilmore said: r2r chips that are 24 bit seem impossible to make, or not enough demand yet to develop them. soekris,totaldac,msb,holo,denafrips etc all use the same lvc595 for the switches, and all are exactly the same idea. but the new soekris is the only one yet with a discrete class A output stage. And a rational price. What about dcs? I've heard about them a few times but I'm pretty in the dark as to what they do differently, if anything at all. Anyone heard their stuff? I like their casework!
Craig Sawyers Posted May 9, 2017 Report Posted May 9, 2017 DCS is top drawer gear. The relatively small design team there are massively experienced and innovative. They started off designing electronics systems for defence applications back in the 80's, and then morphed into professional audio and then high end audio. Instead of using an off the shelf DAC, they use an FPGA and their own "ring DAC" (whatever that is...) I have heard one of their pieces of kit in a high end system owned by an ex-colleague and it was truly superb. The only "but" is that their gear is expensive - the Vivaldi above is the blunt end of $35k 1
nopants Posted July 26, 2017 Report Posted July 26, 2017 my soekris 1541 arrived, the knob is a bit wonky - it's misaligned, scrapes against the faceplate for a portion of its rotation. luckily it only matters for the headphone connection.need to listen more but it's not bad so far. one advantage it has over the yggdrasil is that it's like 1/10 the size 4
dsavitsk Posted July 26, 2017 Report Posted July 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, nopants said: the knob is a bit wonky - it's misaligned, scrapes against the faceplate for a portion of its rotation. This is often due to a 1/4" knob on a 6mm shaft. If that's the case, a layer or two of masking tape on the shaft will add about enough thickness. 2
nopants Posted July 27, 2017 Report Posted July 27, 2017 (edited) I first tried it out with the Focal Elears, only have an AQ Dragonfly Red to compare. Less fatiguing to listen to than the dragonfly, and the headphone out seems to coax a lot of bass out of the Elears - overall very enjoyable, though I don't really use dynamic headphones for critical listening anymore. I think the headphone out combined with the size makes it a good alternative to the Yggdrasil based on the features. I'll definitely use the headphone out more though, electrostatics and summer weather don't get along. I haven't messed with the crossfeed too much, but I can say it works. Overall I'm not the biggest fan of the selectable filters and crossfeed, makes me feel like they were trying to please too many people at once. I left it running for like 8h (accidentally), the case got to around 110 F but it was still chugging along fine. Probably a fair bit hotter inside. Maybe worth noting that the 1541's enclosure is vented, while the Yggdrasil seems to be sealed as far as I can tell. Just set it up with the T2 > 007 mkii chain, feeding it with a Wavelink HS so I can try out some of my Hi-Res PCM stuff. This is the same setup I use for the Yggdrasil, no direct USB connection. I'll hold off on more detailed impressions, but in comparison to the Yggdrasil the soundstage is a lot smaller - definitely don't get that same impression of spacing & air between voices/instruments/etc. In general vocals seem to be up close and personal, that's the first thing that caught my attention while listening on the electrostatic setup. The treble is also a bit harsher on the 1541, which you can tune a bit with the filter selections. There's also a bit more bass impact. Maybe it's from the differences in filtering? Or maybe I just bought into Schiit's filter marketing pitch haha. Overall it seems like the 1541 is a bit livelier and intimate in its presentation, but more fatiguing to listen to. Of course things like fatigue have to be assessed over a longer listening period, so grain of salt etc. To-do (vs. Yggdrasil) Compare USB inputs Hook up a Legato II, compare redbook performance Get a picture for size comparison, it's pretty amusing Find a balanced input selector - any suggestions? Edited July 27, 2017 by nopants 3
Dusty Chalk Posted July 27, 2017 Report Posted July 27, 2017 Was it directly in the path of the exhaust vents of the laptop? The only reason I ask is because I've done that with my phone, thought it was overheating, when in fact, it was just convection.
nopants Posted July 27, 2017 Report Posted July 27, 2017 nah lots of space around it, but the ambient of my room may have been a factor as well 1
EdipisReks1 Posted July 27, 2017 Report Posted July 27, 2017 5 minutes ago, nopants said: but the ambient of my room may have been a factor as well If this were a speaker review...
Hopstretch Posted August 6, 2017 Report Posted August 6, 2017 Giving up on Devialet due to their resolutely French customer service and upgrade policies. Not interested in Danish hobbyists or American Schiitheads. Thinking about giving the Swiss a shot ... 1
guzziguy Posted August 6, 2017 Report Posted August 6, 2017 I don't know if I would trust Weiss. If they can't correctly spell analog, what kind of job are they going to do converting to it? 1
Voltron Posted August 6, 2017 Report Posted August 6, 2017 That spelling is what attracted him in the first place! Playback Designs says it is a combination of Swiss - German engineering and American entrepreneurship so how can you go wrong? I still really like my Playback Designs DAC -- especially for DSD but also for PCM -- and they have a fancy new line that is not out yet as far as I can tell. Here are links for the current one and a press release for the new one: http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/impressions-playback-designs-merlot-quad-dsd-dac-syrah-music-server-brief-notes-pinot-quad-dsd-adc/ http://positive-feedback.com/industry-news/playback-designs-dream-series-quad-dsd-dac-transport/ 4
johnwmclean Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 (edited) 11 hours ago, Voltron said: That spelling is what attracted him in the first place! A cultured yankee! Who’d have thought... Edited August 7, 2017 by johnwmclean
mypasswordis Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 Have you been consulting with Stretch's ad algorithm?
Dusty Chalk Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 8 hours ago, gepardcv said: Metrum Acoustics? I suspect his issue is with the '...ue' and the end of 'analogue', which is a perfectly acceptable alternative spelling to 'analog'.
wink Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 British and Aussie people know how to spell analogue, and solder, and aluminium, and say petrol instead of gasoline, etc, etc ad hoc, ad addendum, ad nauseum........ Also gaol is not spelt jail...... 1 1
skullguise Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 "Analogue" is just a reason to charge more for product..... Just like when a store calls itself a "Shoppe" it gets to charge more.....
Grahame Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 (edited) So "Ye Olde Analogue Shoppe" would have maximum markup? Almost ... https://www.inlander.com/spokane/ye-olde-record-shoppe/Content?oid=2133788 Maybe not such a good idea for perishable products due to the potential ambiguity /confusion perhaps? Edited August 7, 2017 by Grahame 1
skullguise Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 ^^^ "Vintage" (Craigslist's favorite word for over-charging)
dsavitsk Posted August 7, 2017 Report Posted August 7, 2017 On 8/6/2017 at 0:06 PM, Voltron said: ... and American entrepreneurship so how can you go wrong? 3 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now