sorenb Posted June 1, 2017 Report Posted June 1, 2017 1 hour ago, kevin gilmore said: really think you should add the t2 current source modified with 2sc4686 and cascade current source to drive the led reference, that still synthesizes the best of everything ...which is what I is using since trying it out ;o) 3
JoaMat Posted June 1, 2017 Report Posted June 1, 2017 I do believe that the T2 current source is the one to aim for. But that’s only for the squirrels and the boys with big pockets filled with c4686. If you want a CCS based on components from Mouser or equivalent then I think 10m90s is good enough for most people, including myself. But we should look for alternatives for 10m90s so in that respect I’m grateful to Kerry’s work. I’ve had a T2 with c4686 and isolated switching power supplies for a while and I really like that amplifier. Probably the cascaded current source for driving the LED is preferred but I like the isolated things. Maybe I should try current source for driving LED, anyone have a schematic? 1
JimL Posted June 1, 2017 Report Posted June 1, 2017 As I recall when Walt Jung was doing his series on current regulators in AudioXpress he found some noise problems with the 317 regulator, don't know if that applies to the LT1117.
Kerry Posted June 2, 2017 Report Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) I saw some noise issues in the Spice model for the regulator version as well. I could mostly control it, but not completely (especially once you go above 20KHz). Here's another idea I came up with (CSS #2 and #4). They will also support 1,000V. You could improve it slightly by adding a DN2540, but I'm not sure it's worth it. These other two models work almost as well as the battery at 10KHz and only a bit worse at 20KHz. The second (#2 below) is probably the best bang per parts. # 4 could be made to be a bit better, but I'm not sure it's worth it. The results are for the first three only (which includes the battery that Kevin came up with). R1 May not be necessary, but it felt good I want to experiment a bit more with it. Edited June 2, 2017 by Kerry 4
JoaMat Posted June 2, 2017 Report Posted June 2, 2017 Nice picture. If a1486 had been a kV device the T2 current source would be a better one? Most of the variation of the green curve must be due to the 150k resistors.
JoaMat Posted June 2, 2017 Report Posted June 2, 2017 6 hours ago, JoaMat said: Nice picture. If a1486 had been a kV device the T2 current source would be a better one? Most of the variation of the green curve must be due to the 150k resistors. Ops! Kevin pointed out the resistors in this post. On 2017-04-24 at 1:44 PM, kevin gilmore said: the closest thing to a perfect current source is a high voltage tube with a cathode resistor, i.e. megatron T2 current source is actually not really very good because the resistor divider for the pnp current source causes a significant change in current for example 700v peak to peak on the plate the current varies from 13.3 to 15.8ma same thing for a cascoded depletion mode is 14.8ma to 14.85ma a better idea would be to replace the stacked pnp and resistor with a very highly isolated dc to dc converter, something good for 2kv of isolation and you would need 4 of them per amplifier. Sorry.
Kerry Posted June 2, 2017 Report Posted June 2, 2017 I was wrong about not cascading the MOSFETs. It really did help. At this point, spice is showing me the same results as the battery. It would be nice if someone could check this to confirm. The models I'm using for the IXTP01N device seem to be optimistic. Note that J1 only helps if the top MOSFET performs worse. So, if the model is right, then you don't need J1 and we're right back to what Kevin was suggesting
joehpj Posted June 2, 2017 Author Report Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Kerry said: I was wrong about not cascading the MOSFETs. It really did help. How would these compare with LDO+IXTP01N. I assume noise will improve a little bit by using using LT3042. I like the simplicity of the LDO and modern parts are easier to source. Edited June 2, 2017 by joehpj
kevin gilmore Posted June 3, 2017 Report Posted June 3, 2017 other crazy idea for dc to dc converter, using new products one of these the emitter http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/VCC/VAOL-5EWY4/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduhNUPpEGi%2fTWzIKry8%2bJh8FybMNufznF7kCONNnK6Yvsg%3d%3d and one of these as the receiver http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Panasonic/AM-5904CAR/?qs=%2fha2pyFadugs7g8VUByJ5oE9GbMGgLjolVm%2fi%2bg9ILY8mwYKK3C03A%3d%3d 1
JoaMat Posted June 3, 2017 Report Posted June 3, 2017 emitter only needed during night and cloudy conditions?
JoaMat Posted June 3, 2017 Report Posted June 3, 2017 (edited) 20 hours ago, joehpj said: How would these compare with LDO+IXTP01N. I assume noise will improve a little bit by using using LT3042. I like the simplicity of the LDO and modern parts are easier to source. 01N100D with LT1021 to the left. Got the idea from Kerry. LT3042 is a nice piece, but 1021 is a bit bigger and then easier to deal with. Edited June 3, 2017 by JoaMat correction
Kerry Posted June 3, 2017 Report Posted June 3, 2017 I like the idea of the solar cell. Very cool Here's what I was playing with for the LT1021... I got the idea from here... IXYS App Notes There are a couple of other interesting ideas in here as well.
joehpj Posted June 3, 2017 Author Report Posted June 3, 2017 Please call an ambulance. 1021's dead. BTW, the noise should be out of 20kHz so it shouldn't matter?
PretentiousFood Posted June 5, 2017 Report Posted June 5, 2017 No access to Spice right now but I've had great luck with this circuit and a variation using two PNPs and two DMOSs. If base current starves the zener, use a Darlington or replace the LND150 with a BSS126 or BSP135, I think the reason why the DMOS circuit is so good is that it does not have a bias string that runs parallel to the CCS. The way it's cascoded also holds the lower device's Vce or Vds constant rather than holding Vbc constant, as most PNP cascodes do. Using a BJT as the lower device almost always results in more transconductance, and thus higher impedance.
kevin gilmore Posted June 5, 2017 Report Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) biggest problem with this is that it can't handle anything like 1kv with the parts shown you can replace the lnd150 with a 10m90s or ixta01n100d cascode, then also use a ixta01n100d as the current source device. will test later Edited June 5, 2017 by kevin gilmore
JoaMat Posted June 7, 2017 Report Posted June 7, 2017 Today I’ve equipped my modified T2 with the 01N100D/LT1021 current source Kerry has simulated, see previous posts. From beginning it had a straight 10M90S set to 10 mA. When JimL came with the cascaded version I removed the two resistors at 10M90S and added a small board with the DN2540 and corresponding resistors(red circle below). Today I made new daughter boards containing LT1021, 1k resistor and 47pF cheremic capacitor (green circle). Have listen to this for an hour. It works and I’m satisfied. Thanks Kerry for coming up with this. Below solar cell. Only for experimental purpose. 8
Kerry Posted June 7, 2017 Report Posted June 7, 2017 Excellent! I'm curious if you were thinking of testing this same current source as a replacement for the battery (2mA to bias the CCS transistors) in the larger T2 as well. I'm curious how it compares to the batteries.
JoaMat Posted June 7, 2017 Report Posted June 7, 2017 That’s very tempting. I’ve to figure out how that is best done on the original board.
JoaMat Posted June 7, 2017 Report Posted June 7, 2017 It was actually very easy to rebuild the large T2 with the DC/DC converters. Used same daughter board layout as for as for my modified T2, only had to move one hole 50th. I also have plenty of space since I only use one and not three output transistors and I found some nice spots for the daughter boards. One channel has the DC/DC converters and the other the newly made 01N100D/LT1021 boards. Both channels seem to work OK. Below: Daughter boards with LT1021 and 01N100D on heat sink. Boards with DC/DC converters and LT3045. Now it's late, done for today. 10
jose Posted June 28, 2017 Report Posted June 28, 2017 What current do I have to measure between R50 pins?In my BH B+ is 450v Enviado desde mi SM-G920F mediante Tapatalk
mwl168 Posted June 28, 2017 Report Posted June 28, 2017 11 hours ago, jose said: What current do I have to measure between R50 pins? If you are referring to the 50 ohm resistors on the EL34 plate CCS, 1VDC measured across the resistor gives you 20mA ( I = V/R, 1/50 = .02) of plate current which I think is conventional. I've know builders that run their Blue Hawaii from 18mA up to 25mA. The Blue Hawaii runs HOT, so need to take into account the heatsink size.
jose Posted June 28, 2017 Report Posted June 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, mwl168 said: If you are referring to the 50 ohm resistors on the EL34 plate CCS, 1VDC measured across the resistor gives you 20mA ( I = V/R, 1/50 = .02) of plate current which I think is conventional. I've know builders that run their Blue Hawaii from 18mA up to 25mA. The Blue Hawaii runs HOT, so need to take into account the heatsink size. Thanks. Sorry, yes I was thinking about CCS. R50 is between DN2540 and the EL34 plate. If 20mA is a normal set-up, I´ll try this. Other stupid question. What value is necessary for 150K resistor (on Gate of 8N80C)? I'm not sure that 1 / 2W is enough
THEOLOGOS SARAFIDIS Posted July 3, 2017 Report Posted July 3, 2017 On 20/4/2017 at 0:15 AM, Laowei said: Thanks Soren. Hello, Please, let me know if the pcb's for this amplifier exist in stock. T. Sarafidis
Pars Posted July 3, 2017 Report Posted July 3, 2017 No, unless someone has extras they are willing to part with.The Gerber file(s) to have boards made are available. Read the thread.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jose Posted August 22, 2017 Report Posted August 22, 2017 I'm listening to my BH right now. The offset drift a bit and you have to wait a few minutes until it stays low and stays stable. All the measurements seem correct. It run hot, very hot, very very hot.... 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now