Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I found out that the switchboard needs a microprocessor (arduino etc) to control it.  same signaling as the original attenuator board.  The idea is no standing power on the relays.

Could someone familiar with this setup take a look at the board just to double check it?

Posted

soren also wanted buffers and a place for the attenuator on the board, which makes the board a fair bit bigger, and thus more expensive. if people think that is a good idea, or have other ideas i am certainly willing to modify. But i think that the smaller board is a better idea

Posted

Would the buffers be installed vertically like on the ubal/bal board? I feel like it might be an issue with stacking one board over the other in that case. I am not likely to use it either because I'll already have the ubal/bal boards.

However I would use an interface for the digital attenuator. I am totally fine with the switch board as is but I wouldn't have an issue with extra features either.

Posted
25 minutes ago, sbelyo said:

does it look ok to send to the board house?

 

As far as I can tell; yes. Not an expert on how to set up the MAX4820 though.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Drew up a little relay board for I/O since the one in the recent group buy one didn't quite fit what I wanted to do. Mainly it was that I needed to use I2C instead of SPI and I want to try stacking XLRs sideways to save space on the back panel. Any suggestions on how to improve it are appreciated. 0.3mm width traces

502ec4b81a.png

f0a42a9969.png

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Looks good. My only suggestions would be:

  1. fatten up the traces a bit
  2. possibly flipping RN1 and swapping U1 with U2 might clean up the routing and number of vias. Or not.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

U1 needs to be close to RN2 which is not really a resistor network, it's a DIP switch to change the I2C address but it uses the same footprint and I was lazy. :P Will look into it anyway, thanks. 

Posted

Consider using jumpers (i.e. 2x3 header) instead of the DIP switch to set the I2C address?.

It should be a bit smaller and once you set the address I doubt it's going to change, so jumpers should be fine :)

//UFN

  • Like 1
Posted

I looked into it and the relays and headers dictate the length of the board so I can't save anything there and it would probably only shave about 1-2mm off the width of the board, which probably isn't enough to do anything. Plus the DIP switch hearkens back to my horrible memories of grade school flip-flop truth table quizzes. 

Posted

2ff58d7b41.png

A little breakout board for the AD5254 digital potentiometer... so I can dynamically bias the Dynalo through my phone (through a uC). 256 step resolution but lowest full wiper resistance seems to be 1k so 3.9 ohm per step. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.