Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So, a C340C105K5R (Mouser 80-C340C105K5R) should do the trick....

 

mwl168, could you please check and update the XL spreadsheet.

Edited by wink
Added info
Posted

Would you not mount the amplifier PCB with the transistors at the bottom of the heatsink? In that case, the balance pot is at the top and the standard straight pot should be OK to adjust even after the board is mounted?

 

//UFN

That's a good idea, I actually have not thought of. I think that is possible and is probably the best solution to prevent everything from getting too cramped. 

Posted (edited)

On the BOM Edit 9/18 on line 19, the cap 80-C320C104J5R is shown as 0.1uF 50V

On the PCB it is 1Uf 50V

Out of town at the moment so cannot check the board. But I believe these caps  (80-C320C104J5R) are for the servo. There is another 1uf cap (ECQ-E2105KF) listed in the BOM for the 1uF position. Will double check when I return home.

Edited by mwl168
Posted

I purposely picked the 1.7V LED because that's what I built the KGSSHV with.

If you read the original KGSS article Kevin published in HeadWize, the first and second stage LEDs will even each out regardless of 1.7V or 2.1V LED used. However, higher voltage LED on the output stage will bias the amp to run at higher current I believe.

Hope Kevin, Burger or others can chime in. 

Posted

On the BOM Edit 9/18 on line 19, the cap 80-C320C104J5R is shown as 0.1uF 50V

On the PCB it is 1Uf 50V

Checked the board today. 80-C320C104J5R (two needed) is for the servo position. 667-ECQ-E2105FK (one needed) on the BOM is for the 1uF/50V position on the board. It's 1.5mm lead spacing and rated 250V. 

Posted

Yeah, sorry for that,

 

That's what I get for doing things like this at 3AM in the morning.

 

I completely missed those 2 caps in the servo.

I should have twigged to the fact that the lead spacing was all wrong.   My bad.

Posted

No worries. 

Please do continue to report errors in the BOM and suggest more appropriate or better parts to use. Especially those capacitors, the size and lead spacing can be tricky and I am never quite sure what material of capacitor to use for some of the positions.

Posted

For the 7815/7915 regulators  I use these which have insulated tabs making it easier to build.

Insulated tab package TO-220-3FP

Part # NJM7815FA and NJM7915FA avail at Mouser

Posted

Please check the 5pf cap, the one I received was way too large.  I am not sure if this has already been corrected?  This P/N works: 75-561R10TCCV50

Thanks

 

If you are talking about the GR HV Dual BOM, the P/N you listed is what's currently in the BOM. I do remember I first started the BOM using mica caps and later changed it.  Sorry about that.

The mica caps are larger in size and more expensive and I don't know if it offers meaningful advantage in this particular application. 

Posted (edited)

Any particular benefit to using the film QYX1H474KTP over a  standard ceramic .47uf 50v cap? The film ones have some size to them as well.

 
Edited by GeorgeP
Posted (edited)

andy/steve have a the first working carbon from the group buy boards. (fat power supply boards)

(400v)

to hit 20ma, going to need to change the tail resistor on the offset pot probably to 100 ohms.

Edited by kevin gilmore
Posted

We ordered from the BOMs that were first posted. Everything was good except the 4700uf caps for the 15v PS need to be 16mm dia with 7.5mm lead spacing.

Also as mentioned above, to get to 20ma (1v across the testpoints) you will need to lower the 182 ohm resistor by the offset pot to 120 ohm. 

Amp been running for 3 hours without any issues. Initial impressions? Reminds me of the T2!

Many thanks to Kevin, Brigir, Michael and others for an outstanding design and for putting this group buy together.

Photo is from yesterday before installing the transformer and the wiring.

Carbon Left Side.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Amp been running for 3 hours without any issues. Initial impressions? Reminds me of the T2!

There is a reason KG and I are selling off our T2 parts...  :)

Is a change to 100ohms also acceptable since I didn't order 120ohm resistors? Has this change anything to do with variance in parts of the ccs?

You could even go lower than 100R so no problem there. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.