gepardcv Posted June 29, 2015 Report Share Posted June 29, 2015 See attached image for a sketch for both 388 and 288 cases. There isn't much room for error, unfortunately. Even shaving off 1-2mm off the boards would help them fit. They will likely fit as is, though (maybe with Kapton tape along the back and front panels, since they will touch the boards). Since we just barely started discussing transformer specs on the main kgsshv thread, it's hard to know what SumR or Toroidy can do (or if r-cores make more sense, and how large they need to be). If the whole thing can fit in a Galaxy 288, then with 5cm sinks on both sides, the entire amplifier will be the size of a Galaxy 388 case, which is quite compact. That said, even a 388 with sinks is fairly reasonable. It'll fit on all but the smallest desks. As for sinks, I would be delighted to find ones angled upwards, like on Justin's BHSE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lifnkos Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 Two sets for me please. 4 amp boards 2 normal and 2 fat single psu boards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palchiu Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 mwl168 Thank you! One set of Amp One set of Fat PSU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwayshungry Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 Thanks for organizing the GB I will take 2 sets: 1) 2 sets of amp boards (4 total) 2) 2 sets of single fat PSU boards (4 total) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnyHiFi Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 Count me in for the following: 4x sets amp boards (8 boards) 4x fat split PSU boards (8 boards) 1x skinny split PSU boards (2 boards) Thank you mwl168 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sorenb Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 See attached image for a sketch for both 388 and 288 cases. There isn't much room for error, unfortunately. Even shaving off 1-2mm off the boards would help them fit. They will likely fit as is, though (maybe with Kapton tape along the back and front panels, since they will touch the boards). Since we just barely started discussing transformer specs on the main kgsshv thread, it's hard to know what SumR or Toroidy can do (or if r-cores make more sense, and how large they need to be). If the whole thing can fit in a Galaxy 288, then with 5cm sinks on both sides, the entire amplifier will be the size of a Galaxy 388 case, which is quite compact. That said, even a 388 with sinks is fairly reasonable. It'll fit on all but the smallest desks. As for sinks, I would be delighted to find ones angled upwards, like on Justin's BHSE. if you are using the single HV/LV boards with chassie mounted caps...you might find it easier to get a fit inside the small Galaxy ... HV single: 3x4.11 LV single:3.72x2.4 Bias:3.56x2.0 (including NB) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeP Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 How would you mount the caps? Through the top or off-board them? Or am I not looking at it the right way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sorenb Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 the caps are mounted directly onto the chassie ... those ones are big, almost 2U tall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeP Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 Right, so off board then. Got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sorenb Posted June 30, 2015 Report Share Posted June 30, 2015 Yup, for maximum versality ...the caps go off board for the mini GR HV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catfiste Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 I'm down for: 2 sets amp boards (4 boards) 1 set fat single PSU boards (2 boards) 1 set skinny single PSU boards (2 boards) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wokstarr26 Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 The ever hardworking Kevin have a newer amp board with an improved servo, kgsshvcarbonv3. Should we use this lastest board in the gb? Can Kevin please comment regarding improvement over the older design? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefQon Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 I think there are some minor differences but not worth seeking out 1968s for the prices they command Good thing I'm sitting on about 200 pieces of 1968's. I know Birgir is sitting on few thousand or so, he depleted pretty much all the 1968's in Japan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 I have too much sand... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sorenb Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 I have too much sand... do you want help on that problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritzer Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 Maybe at some point... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nopants Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 Is anyone else getting hammered by questions about the Carbon? You'd think they were in mass production by the way people are trying to suck your dick for listening impressions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwl168 Posted July 2, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 (edited) I have posted the GB participant details as of July 2 in my first post of this thread. Please check and make sure I got your information correct. Sorenb has asked for the GoldenReference LV boards and separate Bias boards. Are there others that are interested in these boards? Also, I have one inquiry on using the V3 Carbon board. I have visually traced both the latest Carbon V2 and V3 boards that Kevin posted on 6/30 (someone(s) else really need to trace them, including the PS boards, to make sure I did not miss something). However, we know the V2 circuit has been tested but not the new servo on the V3. I am inclined to use the V2 board for the GB but am open to make V3 boards for those daring J Please bear in mind that the cost of the board is in direct correlation with the number of boards ordered. I am working on getting quotes from fab houses and hope to provide updates soon. Edited July 2, 2015 by mwl168 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nopants Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 I would say just focus on the carbon and associated psus, it will become progressively more difficult to document and track any errors that pop up. unless you get overwhelming reception the low volume stuff should be trimmed. doesn't the split supply already have lv and bias sections? I didn't see anything wrong with the amplifier boards but I probably need to take another look Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin gilmore Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 Is anyone else getting hammered by questions about the Carbon? You'd think they were in mass production by the way people are trying to suck your dick for listening impressions yes, and most of them are completely clueless. its going to get worse. i just posted the final schematic for the circlotron output board, and will probably have a board layout by monday. 350 volts per microsecond! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanity Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 I am open to either the v2 or v3 version. If I could choose I'd prefer the better servo. My entry in the list is correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nopants Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 that's enough slew to feed the entire stax thread on hifi with enough left over for all the people who use ray's products Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsnake Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 My entry in the list is correct. I would prefer the V2 pcb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerry Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 Mine looks right. I'd like to get the most recent rev of the boards. Also,I would be interested in the golden reference LV version if there are enough others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nopants Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 I thought the golden ref lv was for actual power applications like the dynalo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.