eggil Posted July 29, 2015 Report Posted July 29, 2015 Oops! Sorry! If at all possible I would like to update mine to: amp board v5: 8 Dual HV PS: 2 Single FAT HV PS: 4 Thanks
sorenb Posted July 29, 2015 Report Posted July 29, 2015 Update on Caps GB: the Kemet 680uF/550V (screw terminal) from Farnell at +100 is at 24,5USD each (spreadsheet updated) I guess the snap in caps would be at a slightly lower price I assume.
kingofsnake Posted July 29, 2015 Report Posted July 29, 2015 All correct with me. Really excellent job mwl168 ready to send payment.
mwl168 Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 Lots of changes here and from PMs I received in the last few days. Also have non-official quotes on upgrading the HV PS boards to 3oz copper and looks like the cost difference will be minimal ( should be less than $1 US per board). Unless there are objections I like to switch all HV PS boards to 3oz copper as Kevin suggested. I will post new GB details with everyone's quantity/cost updated in a few days.
wokstarr26 Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 I am in for four Mundorf capacitors. Updated spreadsheet.
sorenb Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 The GB has two almost similar boards: "HV Single Fat" and "HV Single Skinny", both has a right (HV+LV) and a left (HV+BIAS), they differ in dimensions only as far as I can see, where the FAT version is 4.05" x 5.45", and the "Skinny" is 3" x 6.48". The dimensions for the FAT makes it impossible to mount in a 2U chassie other than horizontal. The Skinny however, can be mount both horizontal and vertical. My question to the GB participants that has choosen the FAT singles, would they consider changing to Skinny singles if the board is being traced?
kevin gilmore Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 fat boards are needed for the circlotron. does not make sense to mount the power supplies vertical when you have to mount the boards horizontal in a 2U
sorenb Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) can the FAT boards be used for HV900? Edited July 30, 2015 by sorenb
kevin gilmore Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 you need 2 fat boards plus 4 of the hv boards for a circlotron
sorenb Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 you need 2 fat boards plus 4 of the hv boards for a circlotron Please clarify what can be used for the HV900 supply: HV Single FAT HV Single Skinny GR HV Dual
kevin gilmore Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 none! its not instead of, its in addition too if you want to get it in the box, you will need a pair of fat 450v power supply boards AND you will need 4 of the 900v power supply boards putting 2 of the 450v power supply boards in series to get a 900v board is likely going to cause all sorts of problems.
sorenb Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 fat boards are needed for the circlotron. So there are nothing special about the Skinny Single, or the Fat Single ....can be used for Circlotron or any other amp for regular HV, right? As far as I understand both FAT and Skinny includes BIAS/LV in addition to the HV, so a right+left of either Fat or Skinny will result in HV+LV+BIAS, similar to the GR Fat Dual, right?
kevin gilmore Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) how many times are you going to continue to try to ask the same question in multiple different ways, expecting a different result. Its roughly the same number of square inches (and in fact cubic inches) no matter how you cut up the pie, split up to separate bias/lv etc. pick one. If its not compatible with the majority of the group buy, well tough. dual ground referenced 450v supply is 6 x 6.48, 39 square inches single fat ground referenced supply is 5.45 x 4.05, 22 square inches single skinny gound refenced supply is 3 x 6.48 inches, 19.5 square inches (exactly half of the dual supply) circlotoron 900v supply is 5.95 x 4.72 inches, 28 square inches i have done other boards for you with the power caps off board etc. And its still the same number of cubic inches. It has to be, its always the same exact number of the exact same parts. the 900v board MUST float. so offboarding the electrolytics to capacitor clamps is a very bad idea because caps float with the music. i do not understand why this is so hard. print out the board layouts, attach to cardboard and attempt to mount to your desired chassis. either it fits or it does not fit. yes the goldenreference lv supply is better than the pair of 3 terminal regulators. and it is also additional square inches. Edited July 30, 2015 by kevin gilmore
kingofsnake Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Bloody hell this is getting silly! Too many choices fat-skinny-onboard-offboard-L-R-etc...etc...etc....and people are getting in a Tizz. Lets all just stick to what we asked for in the first place. If it turns out that a board you wanted costs 3x as much as another then Tuff luck! lets all just be very grateful that we have been granted access to these wonderful creations and let mwl168 get on with the ordering process. All this chopping and changing is making life more difficult than it need be for mwl168 who took it upon himself to organise this masssssiveeee GB. sorry if i have offended anyone......I just want these boards/cap's in my sweaty palms.....NOW!!
sorenb Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 Well, well, not excatly my point or reason for asking the question ... but if it has offended anyone I am sorry, was actually trying to simplify this GB a bit ....
Pars Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) Yep, this has to be the most confused/confusing GB I've seen. From simple concept to kitchen sink... EDIT: it was suggested in a pm that I might want to elaborate on what I find so confusing. I don't really feel the need to, but posts 283-290 should pretty much sum it up Edited July 30, 2015 by Pars 2
kingofsnake Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 My question to the GB participants that has choosen the FAT singles, would they consider changing to Skinny singles if the board is being traced? I put myself down for 2x Fat and 2x Skinny. I would be more than happy to change to 4x skinny single's. Firstly if it makes things a little simpler for mwl168, Secondly if it makes them a bit cheaper for everyone then thats good too and thirdly if you intend to trace the chosen pcb's then that would seal the deal! i would trace them myself if i only knew what that meant?.............
gepardcv Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 I chose the fat boards because they fit easily in a 300mm-depth Modushop Dissipante box. The skinny boards are longer, and IIRC require a 400mm-deep box. It'd be nice to use 2U, but I can live with 3U in exchange for less depth.
mwl168 Posted July 30, 2015 Author Report Posted July 30, 2015 My question to the GB participants that has choosen the FAT singles, would they consider changing to Skinny singles if the board is being traced? I put myself down for 2x Fat and 2x Skinny. I would be more than happy to change to 4x skinny single's. Firstly if it makes things a little simpler for mwl168, Secondly if it makes them a bit cheaper for everyone then thats good too and thirdly if you intend to trace the chosen pcb's then that would seal the deal! i would trace them myself if i only knew what that meant?............. Thanks for the consideration. My real concern is the board cost - at the already small quantity of the skinny boards, further decrease in the quantity will no doubt have significant impact to the cost. I don't remember if I traced the HV Single Skinny boards but I did trace the HV Single Fat boards.
eggil Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 I'll go for whatever you guys decide and happy to have mine changed to what's is most convenient and cost effective to all.
nopants Posted July 30, 2015 Report Posted July 30, 2015 ^ that was my logic as well so I'm indifferent
MLA Posted July 31, 2015 Report Posted July 31, 2015 I chose the fat boards because they fit easily in a 300mm-depth Modushop Dissipante box. The skinny boards are longer, and IIRC require a 400mm-deep box. It'd be nice to use 2U, but I can live with 3U in exchange for less depth. +1.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now