postjack Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) Hey now! Short story is I'm tired of messing with phone cameras. There's always something I'm unhappy with: apps are slow to load, difficult to hold the phone and take a good picture, changing settings using a touchscreen, takes too long for pictures to focus, etc. What I'm looking for is a nice point n' shoot for vacations, family pictures, and totin' around music festivals. Most music festivals won't let you into the concert grounds with a camera with a detachable lens, as they reserve this privilege for people with press passes. Some have revised their rules to be "no detachable lenses over 2 inches" or something similar, but I'd rather it not be an issue as all. Couple this with the fact that I know zero about photography and I don't want a camera that is too complicated, or too expensive, which is why I want a point and shoot (or compact digital camera or whatever they call them). I've done a bit of light googling over the weekend and have determined that a $500 price range isn't unreasonable for a decent quality small camera that will perform better than a smartphone camera. Right now I'm looking at the Sony RX100, either version I or version II. Seems to get great reviews and is in my price range. I actually went to Best Buy yesterday and messed around with the display model. I wasn't crazy about the hand feel, but I guess thats the price you pay for such a small size. So in a nutshell: -$500ish budget -Relatively beginner friendly, although I'm definitely willing to take the time to learn. -Fast focus, meaning I can quickly pull the camera up and start taking shots So any recommendations you can throw out that I can do some more research on would be appreciated. Thanks headcase. Edited March 23, 2015 by postjack Quote
Voltron Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 JH13, er I mean SRX100 mk ii or iii. 1 Quote
aardvark baguette Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 aardvark is able to get a decent shot with the sony rx100 mk2. that's all you need to know. 1 Quote
VPI Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 Big fan of the rx100 MKII or you might even look for a RX10 for all that zoom for concerts. I know, I know, budget, I don't like budgets. Quote
aardvark baguette Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 i think i paid like $800 for the sony. looks like it dropped a few hundred dollars since then. http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100M-Cyber-shot-Digital-Camera/dp/B00DM8R866 Quote
Grand Enigma Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 The RX100 i/ii/iii should do just fine, and if you aren't in the front row, RX10 like Jeff suggested. Quote
aardvark baguette Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 actually, maybe the mk3 is what i have. not sure now. Quote
postjack Posted March 23, 2015 Author Report Posted March 23, 2015 Sounds like a consensus for the RX100 MKII or III, thanks guys. I should have emphasized at festivals I'm not looking to get super awesome shots of the musicians, there are plenty of pros that will do that for me. So a kick ass zoom isn't a big factor. This is more for general shots: the crowd, the scenery, large views of the stages, etc. Just some good looking photos I can flip through to remember the weekend. Quote
Grand Enigma Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 RX100 MK II then. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/801186443-USE/sony_dscrx100m2_b_cyber_shot_dsc_rx100_ii_digital.html Quote
Grahame Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) +1 on the RX100 MKii (check out the exif data on my obviously shallow DOF shots) Isn't it about time for Jeff to upgrade? ( ) Edited March 23, 2015 by Grahame Quote
VPI Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 Some RX100 concert photos, and a random Brent photo for reference. 6 Quote
VPI Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 +1 on the RX100 MKii (check out the exif data on my obviously shallow DOF shots) Isn't it about time for Jeff to upgrade? ( ) Just sold it last week. 1 Quote
morphsci Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 Another +1 on the RX100 Mkii. As soon as my S95 bites the dust (or I smash it into little bits), the Sony will be mine. 1 Quote
dsavitsk Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) For a counter point, I like my Canon S100 a lot. It is way under your budget so you could probably attend 5 or 6 additional concerts with the savings. The Sony looks nice, too, and who wouldn't want a camera made by an insurance company? Take a look at the little Panasonics, too (the one with the Leica lens). I know some people who swear by it. Edited March 23, 2015 by dsavitsk Quote
Grand Enigma Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 I wonder if that outlook has changed any with the success of their NEX lineup. Quote
Torpedo Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 If the RX100 can make Brent look that handsome and interesting, I'm buying one right away. Well, maybe before summer vacation Quote
morphsci Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 If the RX100 can make Brent look that handsome and interesting, I'm buying one right away. Well, maybe before summer vacation He still doesn't have a biscuit. Quote
VPI Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) For a counter point, I like my Canon S100 a lot. It is way under your budget so you could probably attend 5 or 6 additional concerts with the savings. The Sony looks nice, too, and who wouldn't want a camera made by an insurance company? Take a look at the little Panasonics, too (the one with the Leica lens). I know some people who swear by it. Canon S100 is really nice, and there is a really cheap one for sale somewheres around here. Edited March 23, 2015 by VPI 1 Quote
blessingx Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 RX100 refurb sale - http://dealmac.com/iphone/deals/1309438.html Quote
Grahame Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 RX100 refurb sale - http://dealmac.com/iphone/deals/1309438.html Ric, Looks like that's a mk one Abes of main does mk i new for $346 http://www.abesofmaine.com/item.do?item=SNDSCRX100 mk ii = $475 http://www.abesofmaine.com/item.do?item=SNDSCRX100M2B&id=SNDSCRX100M2B&l=SITECHAMP&kbid=Sony%2520Cybershot%2520Dscrx100%2520Ii mk iii = $798 on amazon Quote
shellylh Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 (edited) I like my Ricoh GR if you want something that is a little bigger (it feels very nice in the hands). The only problem is that it is a fixed zoom and probably won't fit very well in your jean pockets. It is fine in a jacket pocket. It has snap focus which is very nice for low light/night shots. I've never tried the Sony but thought about getting an mk ii when I got the Ricoh. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/965424-REG/ricoh_175743_gr_digital_camera.html Edited March 23, 2015 by shellylh 1 Quote
grawk Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 The Panasonic LUMIX cameras are pretty nice as well. 1 Quote
The Expanding Man Posted March 23, 2015 Report Posted March 23, 2015 Pentax Q body of some sort with a matching Pentax 06 lens. Small form factor, DSLR menus and functions, equivalent 35mm focal length to 70-200 zoom. For me, this replaced my Canon S95 for your type of uses. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.