RudeWolf Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 Now, don't tell me that I'll be able to mount them flat on a 2U sink! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerry Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 They’re designed to sit flat on 75mm or taller heat sinks, so 2U will work just fine. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted March 29, 2021 Report Share Posted March 29, 2021 (edited) Planning on using for the GRLV the OPA134PA, if it is ok. Also, which LT1021 exactly have you been using, any p/n by the hand? This one is with 0.05% tolerance. Edited March 29, 2021 by starcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmking Posted March 30, 2021 Report Share Posted March 30, 2021 (edited) 15 hours ago, starcat said: Planning on using for the GRLV the OPA134PA, if it is ok. Also, which LT1021 exactly have you been using, any p/n by the hand? This one is with 0.05% tolerance. opa134pa is exactly what i am using and is fine the LT1021DCN8-10#PBF is about half the price of the version of the reference your are proposing. The output accuracy is a function of the accuracy of the LT AND the divider network (which sets the output voltage) by taking the output and dividing it down to a nominal 10V. This is fed to the opamp which acts as a comparator between this and the LT. Unless you are going to use 0.1% or better tolerance hand picked resistors for the divider network there is not much point in spending $$$ on a very accurate version of the reference when the divider resistors are 1% and will drown out any extra accuracy a more expensive version of the LT will provide.... If you want high accuracy and don't want to spend $$$ you can always hand measure and match the resistors to get a more accurate output voltage (if you need that level of accuracy). Edited March 30, 2021 by jamesmking 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted March 30, 2021 Report Share Posted March 30, 2021 (edited) Thanks, James, highly appreciated your feedback. Edited March 31, 2021 by starcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwmclean Posted April 1, 2021 Report Share Posted April 1, 2021 (edited) Long time between drinks, been working on this for a few months and finally got my panels back. It’s going to be a dual mono GRLV PS with a quartet of CFA2’s, balanced in and out using a Goldpoint 10k 47 position stepper. Edited April 1, 2021 by johnwmclean 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pars Posted April 1, 2021 Report Share Posted April 1, 2021 That looks really nice John. A lot of planning (all the board and device holes, etc.). That doesn't appear to be a Modu case, and looks nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGW Posted May 6, 2021 Report Share Posted May 6, 2021 On 3/26/2021 at 1:04 AM, Kerry said: Work in progress... I should be able to test soon 🤞 What on earth is this now? Looks epic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted May 6, 2021 Report Share Posted May 6, 2021 1 minute ago, GGW said: What on earth is this now? Looks epic SMD version of the CFA Electrostatic 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin gilmore Posted May 6, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2021 not cfa electrostatic. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerry Posted May 6, 2021 Report Share Posted May 6, 2021 SMD version of the CFA3 dynamic 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGW Posted May 7, 2021 Report Share Posted May 7, 2021 13 hours ago, Kerry said: SMD version of the CFA3 dynamic Ah Awesome! @Kerry @kevin gilmore - what would you gents consider to be the ultimate overkill build for this CFP/A? 4x CFA2 boards or 2x CFA3 boards in 2 separate chassis, with 2 separately enclosed GRLV psu? Or is this new SMD animal you have designed the way to go, assuming the same multiple separate chassis & PSU overkill plan? Separately, I've read the entire thread and can't seem to get my head around the difference between using 4x CFA2 boards or 2x CFA3 boards - are there additional PCBs that need to be printed if I go the 4xCFA2 route (scheming going down this road and 2 dissipante cases such that each pcb has its own heatsink). Or do I just wait and go for the SMD boards you're working on? Many thanks in advance for the help and guidance Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted May 7, 2021 Report Share Posted May 7, 2021 (edited) Just go 2x CFA3 boards and 2x GRLV (on one or even two transformers). For the amp you do not need to separate the + and - per channel, so 2x CFA3 boards is more than good to go. No need to put the CFA3 boards in separate cases, if you want to separate the L and R channels, put an aluminium divider in the mid of the amp case and use per channel umbilical on the back (off separate GRLVs and transformers in the PSU case), so basically going strict dual mono in two chassis in total. That's already more than overkill. You can have the headphone protector as well (for dynamic headphones, stats don't need that) and eventually the ZF/SS selector (which I didn't do). Edited May 7, 2021 by starcat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin gilmore Posted May 7, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2021 cfa2 is balanced out only with a balanced input cfa3 is balanced out regardless of input. also some versions are ZF/SS 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MASantos Posted May 7, 2021 Report Share Posted May 7, 2021 14 hours ago, Kerry said: SMD version of the CFA3 dynamic Looks great!! Count me interested in a group buy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwmclean Posted June 8, 2021 Report Share Posted June 8, 2021 A CFA2 balanced. Finished this a whiles back. 22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwl168 Posted June 8, 2021 Report Share Posted June 8, 2021 As always, a master piece from you John. Care to share a few listening impressions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robm321 Posted June 8, 2021 Report Share Posted June 8, 2021 Gorgeous! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwmclean Posted June 9, 2021 Report Share Posted June 9, 2021 18 hours ago, mwl168 said: Care to share a few listening impressions? I do need a planar... but HD800S are amazing with the CFA2. Comparative to the mini dynalo it’s more refined, open, bass has better detail and impact. I’ve not heard the HD800S sound this good, not quite as good as the SR-007 with a Carbon, but could be very content with the small compromises. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted June 9, 2021 Report Share Posted June 9, 2021 (edited) I was comparing the HD800 to a HE-6 planar on a RSA The Dark Star. Both phones were pretty close, the HE-6 won by a small amount. And I still have this combo. Gorgeous build, John, congrats. Btw, what are the transformer covers that you are using? And what are the PCBs on the back and the one mounted on the front panel right next to the phones jack? Edited June 9, 2021 by starcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwmclean Posted June 10, 2021 Report Share Posted June 10, 2021 9 hours ago, starcat said: Btw, what are the transformer covers that you are using? And what are the PCBs on the back and the one mounted on the front panel right next to the phones jack? The transformer and covers both from from Antek: https://www.antekinc.com/ca-100-steel-cover/ The rear panel has a diyaudio soft start circuit (blue pcb) and also amb audios ε24 power switch driver circuit/small transformer for the momentary switch on the front. Next to the output on the front is Kevins balanced headphone protector. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwl168 Posted June 10, 2021 Report Share Posted June 10, 2021 14 hours ago, johnwmclean said: I do need a planar... but HD800S are amazing with the CFA2. Comparative to the mini dynalo it’s more refined, open, bass has better detail and impact. I’ve not heard the HD800S sound this good, not quite as good as the SR-007 with a Carbon, but could be very content with the small compromises. Interestingly, my experience very much mirror yours - HD800 was the first can I used with my CFA2 and I could not stop listening to that combo. The control, speed, clarity are amazing and addictive. The second can I grabbed to try on the CFA2 was my Audeze LCD2 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted June 10, 2021 Report Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) Anyone here tested the PecanPi XLR-out/DAC with the Pi as roon (or LMS) endpoint? Measurements look pretty amazing and I am thinking about ordering one and if it passes the listening test, putting it in a nice custom case with a GRLV. So... ETH in and XLR analog out. To be used with all the amps here. Nice control via iPad. Edited June 10, 2021 by starcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherwood Posted June 15, 2021 Report Share Posted June 15, 2021 Looks sweet, Starcat. Let me know if it works well, it would be a very cool remote source for the inevitable separate system locations we all accrue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcat Posted June 15, 2021 Report Share Posted June 15, 2021 1 minute ago, Sherwood said: Looks sweet, Starcat. Let me know if it works well, it would be a very cool remote source for the inevitable separate system locations we all accrue. Sure, ordered parts and building a 9V 1.5A positive only GRLV for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.