blessingx Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 (edited) Might as well start a separate thread for this. Edited September 9, 2014 by blessingx
TMoney Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 Color me amazed that they were able to keep the design of this a secret all the way until the keynote.
Grahame Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 A thought for Carl (and others) Journalists, now your editors will require you to write content that can be consumed on a Watch. Godspeed! 5
blessingx Posted September 9, 2014 Author Report Posted September 9, 2014 You can watch the first video at:http://www.apple.com/live/2014-sept-event/c42d94ee-7dea-40a8-98ba-dbd2da60c965?cid=tw-us-c42d94ee-7dea-40a8-98ba-dbd2da60c965-vi
grawk Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 so it boils down to battery life for me. I'm interested in it to replace my suunto.
blessingx Posted September 9, 2014 Author Report Posted September 9, 2014 Interestingly battery life wasn't mentioned in the keynote.
tyrion Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 I was impressed by the watch, compared to the Gear 2. I am not getting an iPhone to get a watch but it does look like a cool device assuming it last more than a day on a charge.
Tyll Hertsens Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 A thought for Carl (and others) Journalists, now your editors will require you to write content that can be consumed on a Watch. Godspeed! I've already been told my paragraphs are too long.
Dusty Chalk Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 I wonder if it will work with the iPod Touch or any other iOS device.
Aura Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 (edited) I seriously want this to be the end-all solution for running outdoors but I've got a few essential questions that weren't explicit on apple's site... the watch will have to use cellular, right? I don't see how else it will be able to utilize something like GPS unless tethering off your phone, which completely defeats the purpose of using it to run. Also, it's got no headphone input. So once again, are you still tied to your phone for music? Bluetooth seems to be lagging desperately on the headphone front. Edited September 9, 2014 by Aura
Grahame Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 Apple sued for wearables prior art? 1
tkam Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 Starting at $350 - iPhone required. So as expected it's a phone accessory. Outside of the payment stuff, I saw nothing interesting that Android Wear can't do. I'm clearly not the market for this sort of thing so I'll bow out of this thread now.
acidbasement Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 (edited) The features list seems pretty silly to me - mostly things that aren't made all that much more awesome by being done on a watch. The walkie-talkie thing is kinda neat, but I suspect you can only do it with other Apple users, which is much less neat. Maybe there'll be some good third-party apps, what do I know? I'm clearly not the market for this sort of thing so I'll bow out of this thread now. Yeah, me too. Edited September 9, 2014 by acidbasement
Dusty Chalk Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 Yeah, it said that it utilizes the phone's GPS and carrier for things like calls and GPS, so yes, you have to bring the phone when you run, and yes, that defeats the purpose. Alas. I'll wait 'til they figure out how to decouple it from the iPhone. For the applications I'm thinking of (musical, e.g. theremin-like controller based on distance and orientation from an iPad), don't mind it being tethered to an iOS device, just sorry it has to be only the iPhone. I will wait for it to be hacked...in 3...2...1...
Aura Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 (edited) Yeah, it said that it utilizes the phone's GPS and carrier for things like calls and GPS, so yes, you have to bring the phone when you run, and yes, that defeats the purpose. Thanks Dusty - yeah I just read that excerpt as well. Definitely not for me then. Edited September 9, 2014 by Aura
Dusty Chalk Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 [tweet]https://twitter.com/Oatmeal/status/509409983583113216/photo/1[/tweet] "Hey bro, you got the time?" "Yeah, it's ... hang on. Just a sec. God fucking damnit. " http://twitter.com/Oatmeal/status/509409983583113216/photo/1pic.twitter.com/2R4MXIVIcY https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video/BxHJrhmCYAAw4Ro.mp4 Sorry, can't be arsed to embed. From
morphsci Posted September 9, 2014 Report Posted September 9, 2014 You can still run with it, you just need to hire a phone bearer. 6
blessingx Posted September 9, 2014 Author Report Posted September 9, 2014 I just like saying "high-performance fluoroelastomer."
blessingx Posted September 10, 2014 Author Report Posted September 10, 2014 Apple Watch: Much ado about nothing 1
Dusty Chalk Posted September 10, 2014 Report Posted September 10, 2014 Also, does anyone remember my quest for an ana-digi watch a long time ago (got over it) (basically, a watch face with hands and pips presented digitially) -- this is basically that. So kinda wouldn't mind a standalone version. An iPod Touch-lette, as it were.
Dusty Chalk Posted September 10, 2014 Report Posted September 10, 2014 I kinda got the impression from what I read that it's not intended to work without an iPhone ever. (As opposed to just "without an iPhone...once in a while".) As in, maybe one's required to activate the watch, etc. But no, don't know that for a fact.
grawk Posted September 10, 2014 Report Posted September 10, 2014 there aren't any details about that. I fully expect it to work without a phone in range, just many features won't work, like the phone and gps stuff. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now