ttfx Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 Headphone in–the-head localization effect cause: sound doesn’t have the couple/affect with the ear and the human upper torso then direct enter the ear channel, the factors for human brain to locate sound source are missing. Solution: supplement the missing factors. I used DSP to handle a music section: the first 10 seconds are intact, then 10 seconds have processed… repeat and cycle for easier comparison. This music section is just for in ear headphone type like AKG3003. Please feel free to comment, I will be very appreciate! You can download this music track from Baidu Cloud storage, link: http://pan.baidu.com/s/1kTp6TDl access code:3x7g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltron Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 This thread gives me a pain localized in my ass. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aura Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefQon Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 Aura's gif is spot on to my reaction. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 I fixed the link so that it goes to where it says it going. I don't think it was fishing attempted, I think this it was just copy-'n'-pasted from someplace odd. (Personal email.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skullguise Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 Headphone in–the-head localization effect cause: sound doesn’t have the couple/affect with the era <all the rest snipped> This is perfectly clear to me....we've been listening to the music in the wrong era! I bet if I time-traveled back to 1842, but brought my portable player and phones/IEM's with me, I would have an out of the head non-localized effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eggil Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 (edited) I assume by era you meant ear? Or may be it was era. Then 1842 would make sense. Edited September 8, 2014 by eggil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wink Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 ear, ear... (must be said with a cockney accent). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 I heard it with an Italian accent. "...ear-uh..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvlgato Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 Fortunately, I have no human torso, therefore headphone listening sounds identical to speaker listening for me. Except for the fact that I have to speak out of my ass, it works out quite well. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted September 22, 2014 Report Share Posted September 22, 2014 Don't know why but I can't stop laughing at that picture ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wink Posted September 22, 2014 Report Share Posted September 22, 2014 There's no body of evidence for a conviction. It's all in your head. It has funny looking ears though. Not at all suited for headphones.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abscission Posted February 5, 2015 Report Share Posted February 5, 2015 The original post sounds like a black magic incantation of some sort. I ain't messing with this shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts