Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Boy that headphone stand/amp/dac is atrocious.  

 

Cheers to Todd & Pete at RMAF -- wish I were hanging with you guys, having beers, and maybe watching the Red Sox kick ass!  (Sorry Todd :P ). Toasting you with a Topless Wytch (c/o Mike Sr. I believe) while working in Mayberry.  Cheers!

 

10233258145_d7ebbb63c6_b.jpg

Edited by Voltron
Posted

Expensive equals good.  Sprinkle on some DHT's and it is awsome!!! 

 

6SN7 driving a 300B.  That's guaranteed awesome right there!

It's like they're not even trying anymore.

Posted

6SN7 driving a 300B.  That's guaranteed awesome right there!

It's like they're not even trying anymore.

 

This stuff isn't about high quality, it's just about using tubes people know about and can waste an untold amount of money to roll. 

  • Like 1
Posted

This stuff isn't about high quality, it's just about using tubes people know about and can waste an untold amount of money to roll. 

No kidding.  The sad part is their $999 WA7 DAC/amp will sound better unless they screwed it up or deliberately crippled it.

Posted

Woo Audio goes INSANE? http://feedly.com/k/GVJ5tE

 

The last pic is the first spec sheet I've ever seen that gives a pounds/channel rating.

 

I mean, I know some manufacturers like to game their specs, but surely no one out there can touch the sheer power of 60 pounds/channel for a headphone amplifier. IS THERE NOTHING MOAR HEAVY OUT THERE?

 

And what's the conversion to furlongs per fortnight?

 

I know we're converting between weight efficiency and speed, but some of you math people can figure it out. Handle it!

Posted

The last pic is the first spec sheet I've ever seen that gives a pounds/channel rating.

 

I mean, I know some manufacturers like to game their specs, but surely no one out there can touch the sheer power of 60 pounds/channel for a headphone amplifier. IS THERE NOTHING MOAR HEAVY OUT THERE?

 

And what's the conversion to furlongs per fortnight?

 

I know we're converting between weight efficiency and speed, but some of you math people can figure it out. Handle it!

 

for a second i thought you said pounds per watt, and thats probably next

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.