GrindingThud Posted December 24, 2016 Report Posted December 24, 2016 I'm trying to source a 3RP/2142GSA1A10K pot for the build. Any good sources online for this?
luvdunhill Posted December 24, 2016 Report Posted December 24, 2016 I determined that the JFET combos were mismatched, and got that correctedI thought my numbering scheme was infallible! Well, in my head at least it is. I bought a bunch of LEDs to test the voltages. I liked the LTST-C170CKT since it had a high Vf. Changing the LED will have a big effect on the output current if it's not matched to the resistor. After all these years I just don't understand why people don't build LED-based CCSes on a breadboard, use a pot to dial in the current and buy the resistor to match the LED. If I had to count the posts of people looking for specific LEDs...... /rant off (not really, still on. Don't be that guy!)
Kerry Posted December 24, 2016 Report Posted December 24, 2016 I've been using the diode tester on my multi-meter (BK 2709B) to check the forward voltage on the LED and transistor. It get's you fairly close to actual currents: current = ( Diode(Vf) - Transistor(be) ) / resistance In fact, when I'm matching transistors for simple current sources I pay more attention to the voltage across the transistor than the hfe (though I match both anyway ). 1
Pars Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 I thought my numbering scheme was infallible!These weren't the devices that I got from you, but the ones that I had in there. Yours are matched very well. I just haven't brought myself to use them yet Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mtoc Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 @Pars Hi Pars, as for the bridges on GR LV, what kinds of bridges are needed? Do some of them measure better? (on the 6.5 bits stuff or even 8.5 bits)
Pars Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 The ones in the BOM are what is needed. I use Schottkys because I believe that they induce less switching noise. The GRLV is very well protected against diode switching noise, so I don't know whether they actually help in this case. I couldn't see anything on my scope when looking at them, but I might not know what to look for and I certainly don't have access to a screen room.I don't know what you are talking about in your last sentence.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pars Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 I'm not sure how to feel about that Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mtoc Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 (edited) oh, sorry. should be digits... where to find to the BOM? I've only got the gerb file... Edited December 27, 2016 by mtoc
Pars Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 What do you want the BOM for? The Dynalo Mk2 (this thread) or the GRLV (a different thread)? The respective BOMs are posted in their thread...Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mtoc Posted December 28, 2016 Report Posted December 28, 2016 8 hours ago, Pars said: What do you want the BOM for? The Dynalo Mk2 (this thread) or the GRLV (a different thread)? The respective BOMs are posted in their thread... The BOM of GRLV. You've mentioned its BOM (the Excel BOM) in the GRLV thread for a few times, but I still haven't find it. I got the gerb file (zip) and the schematics (pdf), unfortunately both of them haven't have the standard/stock bridge model that we should look into.
Pars Posted December 28, 2016 Report Posted December 28, 2016 I thought it was in there. See attached. GR LV BOM_Sep26.xls 1 1
mtoc Posted December 28, 2016 Report Posted December 28, 2016 46 minutes ago, Pars said: I thought it was in there. See attached. GR LV BOM_Sep26.xls I have two of these in my drawer, is that a bit crazy? RBV5006, max RMS voltage 600V, max average forward current 50A (but these are old, datasheet says production begins in 1998). The bridge in the BOM is 100V/4A http://www.allcomponents.ru/synsemi/rbv5006.htmhttp://www.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheets_pdf/R/B/V/5/RBV5006.shtml
Pars Posted December 28, 2016 Report Posted December 28, 2016 ^ this belongs in the golden reference thread, not here.Question: do individual devices run hotter at specific bias than others at the same bias/current?All of my devices (MPSW06/56) are matched by hFE to the best of my ability. Vbe was consistent as well as Ib when matching (monitoring Ib and Ic). Since getting an IR thermometer and looking at temps, I have a couple of devices running at 55C (Q13 on both boards, interesting). Both are running at similar current to neighboring devices and the R value is within 0.02 ohms of others. hFE is also very close. I thought by measuring all of the R values and drop across them that I would see something out of the ordinary for the devices running warmer, but I'm not seeing anything.I'll probably just drop the bias resistors down to 255R for now and revisit when I case the amp to ensure that temps aren't over 50C or so. Any advice on when temp would be a problem appreciated as well. Current is verging on 15mA; these two are running at 14.8 or so (don't have access to data right now). These are thru hole boards also.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
luvdunhill Posted December 28, 2016 Report Posted December 28, 2016 Something nearby Q13 is generating heat? If the voltage drop across the resistors is the same, they should share the same current.
Pars Posted December 28, 2016 Report Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) Nothing that would really generate any heat around that, and I was checking temps around the board anyhow. There are 3-4 others at 50C or more, some in the 30s. This was all done at approximately the same time with the amp having run for an hour or so. Board 1 NPN device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms PNP device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms Q22 10 293.3 39 0.2926 14.64 R44 19.991 Q24 45 293.3 52 0.2916 14.59 R47 19.989 Q21 32 293.1 39 0.2996 15.00 R45 19.978 Q23 18 293.1 46 0.3004 15.03 R46 19.985 Q16 44 93.0 45 0.2998 14.99 R40 19.999 Q17 64 293.0 44 0.2995 14.98 R43 19.992 Q12 8 292.8 40 0.2936 14.69 R32 19.982 Q14 30 292.7 42 0.2949 14.75 R37 19.996 NPN device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms PNP device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms Q11 74 278.9 35 0.2933 14.68 R35 19.983 Q13 11 278.8 55 0.2897 14.50 R36 19.980 Q15 40 279.1 35 0.2929 14.67 R41 19.970 Q18 31 279.4 47 0.2989 14.96 R42 19.982 Q19 5 279.4 45 0.2896 14.50 R51 19.973 Q25 39 279.5 49 0.2944 14.74 R48 19.969 Q20 86 279.6 47 0.2865 14.34 R50 19.982 Q26 90 279.6 38 0.2893 14.49 R49 19.968 bias VR39 1.7420 VR39 1.7420 Board 2 NPN device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms PNP device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms Q22 20 298.6 31 0.2879 14.42 R44 19.965 Q24 93 298.6 50 0.2813 14.08 R47 19.983 Q21 53 298.4 36 0.2883 14.43 R45 19.981 Q23 60 298.4 50 0.2807 14.06 R46 19.969 Q16 55 298.1 42 0.2875 14.39 R40 19.979 Q17 25 298.4 44 0.2905 14.54 R43 19.983 Q12 62 297.2 45 0.2839 14.21 R32 19.973 Q14 76 297.2 42 0.2867 14.36 R37 19.963 NPN device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms PNP device ID hFE temp °C Vr Ie ohms Q11 88 282.2 30 0.2834 14.19 R35 19.968 Q13 55 282.3 55 0.2819 14.12 R36 19.963 Q15 7 282.6 36 0.2869 14.36 R41 19.975 Q18 99 282.5 48 0.2862 14.32 R42 19.980 Q19 85 282.8 43 0.2862 14.31 R51 20.004 Q25 56 282.6 40 0.2860 14.33 R48 19.965 Q20 64 283.3 46 0.2814 14.09 R50 19.975 Q26 49 283.3 37 0.2831 14.16 R49 19.986 bias VR38 1.7344 VR38 1.7380 Edited December 28, 2016 by Pars
Pars Posted December 30, 2016 Report Posted December 30, 2016 I know, tl;dr Question on using an IR thermometer on these.When I aim at the to92 flats, since these are in rows of 4, it seems like the far end device measures hotter than the others, and temp increases as I go down the row. Shooting them from the top results in more even but somewhat lower temps. I think the thermo is picking up more than the one device when going for the flats down the row.Thoughts?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MLA Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 On a tangent; the HD800 sound brilliant out of the Dynalo, but I find myself boosting the bass a couple of dB most of the time for it to sound right to my ears. So far I've used digital EQ, but I wonder if someone has a recommendation for how to incorporate a small add-on circuit/daughterboard that could fill the same function inside an existing Dynalo build? I know there is a ton of circuit suggestions out there, but I'm not good enough at this to figure out what would work well with the Dynalo.
mypasswordis Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 Do the super dupont mod or similar on your hd800, then there's no eq necessary
MLA Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 I did, and that works perfectly when I've got the place to myself and can turn up the volume. However, my social setting requires low volume listening more often than not. At those levels, I need a small bass boost to preserve balance. It's just for convenience; with a switch on the amp I would not have to walk over to the computer to change settings .
Pars Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 You might be able to implement something like this: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/headphone-systems/199530-o2-amp-crc-diode-cap-heatsink-mods-6.html Pay no attention to it being for the O2 amp You would need a 4P switch to pull this off (simple bass boost on/off).
MLA Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 Many thanks, that looks exactly like it! Did some more reading and that O2 mod seems quite similar to how the M3 bass boost is implemented. I have a spare Dynalo in the basement to experiment with; I will give this approach a try and see what comes out of it.
rumina Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 Not a Mini Dynalo but a small one. Finished my Dynalo today, thanks to this forum and the members the build was easy and free of trouble, thanks everyone. Was fun to put it in a small case and solve this puzzle. Also a big thanks to Kevin Gilmore for this design and sharing it with us. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/gallery/showgallery.php?cat=2232 Thanks to sbelyo for the group buy of the pcbs. 4
Pars Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 2 hours ago, rumina said: Not a Mini Dynalo but a small one. Finished my Dynalo today, thanks to this forum and the members the build was easy and free of trouble, thanks everyone. Was fun to put it in a small case and solve this puzzle. Also a big thanks to Kevin Gilmore for this design and sharing it with us. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/gallery/showgallery.php/cat/2231 Thanks to sbelyo for the group buy of the pcbs. Looks good. It appears that you populated all 3 bridge rectifiers in the Power Supply? You should remove the center one. It is there for people who want to use a center-tapped transformer. Since you are using a dual secondary transformer, only the 2 outer bridges are used (BR1 and BR2 in the schematic). With a center-tapped transformer (say 20-0-20), only the center bridge (BR3 in schematic) is used. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now