mikeymad Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 I am old school - I just play my SACD's on my SACD player.. (it is so low-fi)...
Voltron Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 All that spinning and spinning has got to fuck things up, right?
Grahame Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 Only if you fail to use one of these after every play.
skullguise Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 all my DACses are garbage. I need another turntable Turntables are now using the ANALOG512 Synchronius Cross-Undersampling EZ-Bake-Oven Uncontrolled Plutonium Clock technology, make sure you have the latest!
blessingx Posted May 31, 2013 Report Posted May 31, 2013 (edited) You know Quadriple DSD files don't really jive with craft beards. ---------- Also is DSD gonna kill HRx? Edited May 31, 2013 by blessingx 1
Torpedo Posted May 31, 2013 Report Posted May 31, 2013 Turntables are now using the ANALOG512 Synchronius Cross-Undersampling EZ-Bake-Oven Uncontrolled Plutonium Clock technology, make sure you have the latest! Damnation, I got the quasi-latests ANALOG 510 version on order. I'll ask if they can implement that before shipping.
Currawong Posted June 2, 2013 Report Posted June 2, 2013 All the fun I've missed trying to ignore the 'net for a few days. I read the whole discussion about DSD, including the Stereophile links and I'm still not sure what to make of it. A friend is about to receive a Resonance Invicta (I swear that name sounds more like that of a lawn mower than a piece of audio gear. Maybe it's an Australian thing...) which can play back DSD. He has ripped a crapload of SACDs, I have the Weiss converter and hopefully we'll be able to experiment on the weekend. Luxman DA-06. Waaaaant. In all honesty, I think Luxman digital gear is utter rubbish. The DA-100 and DA-200 were so bad it was unbelievable. I was so shocked I waited until someone independently confirmed what I'd heard first. The D-05 was simply underwhelming. It only sounded like a less bad DA-200. Slightly unrelated, but I bought a second-hand Anedio D2 FOTM. I like it better than what I heard of the Benchmark. It's so excessively clear and spacious-sounding that it sounds like the bass isn't there in most music. Since it has a remote control, it is intended for my living room system with the Emotivas. A couple of weeks ago I hosted a mini-meet of local audiophiles and one brought the Mytek. That was very good-sounding from the built-in USB (noting that it was plugged into a PS Audio Power Plant, which would have improved the sound a bit).
blessingx Posted June 2, 2013 Report Posted June 2, 2013 (edited) Interesting read... John Siau: Benchmark Audio Guru on DSDhttp://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=74 Edited June 2, 2013 by blessingx
Hopstretch Posted June 2, 2013 Report Posted June 2, 2013 No DSD, and $40,000 -- but someone on Head-Fi is going to buy one for sure. Atomic! http://antelopeaudio.com/en/products/Rubicon-Atomic-AD-DA-Preamp
Dusty Chalk Posted June 2, 2013 Author Report Posted June 2, 2013 I can't decide if that's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen or the most ugly.
Voltron Posted June 2, 2013 Report Posted June 2, 2013 For me, hideously ugly, and made all the worse by the fact that it is idiotic.
grawk Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 If I had Bill Gates money, I still wouldn't buy anything with that list of features in 1 device, or anything that looked like that.
blubliss Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 Hard to tell at a show (Newport), but the QB-9 DSD sounded like something worth looking into.
Filburt Posted June 3, 2013 Report Posted June 3, 2013 Interesting read... John Siau: Benchmark Audio Guru on DSDhttp://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=74 Heh...I was typing up a post on this topic, but it looks like that is largely superfluous now. I also didn't want to really belabor the point - as Dusty noted, these discussions are generally not geared towards putting others' feet to the fire and aiming towards consensus. In any case, Siau covers a lot of the issues with DSD (though, not all of the issues...) and I agree with him regarding PCM being a more favorable archival format.
HiWire Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 It's a good article. I've read the same kind of thing before, but SACD still works better for me than digital files. Different strokes for different folks.
Torpedo Posted June 4, 2013 Report Posted June 4, 2013 I still think everything comes down to the mixing and mastering. For some reason, they took better care of them when the final product was going to be a DSD release than other formats. Good recordings sound awesome on any format.
mikeymad Posted June 5, 2013 Report Posted June 5, 2013 I still think everything comes down to the mixing and mastering. For some reason, they took better care of them when the final product was going to be a DSD release than other formats. Good recordings sound awesome on any format. Agreed (within reason)...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now