Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

<p>Since Justin's thread wasn't really about a DSD DAC, I thought I'd continue the discussion here.&nbsp; I'm far too lazy to split out the discussion from there and point it here, so I'll just point to <a href="">it there from here</a>.&nbsp; Of particular interest is Torpedo's post <a href="">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So...seems the cheapest points of entry are the <a href="http://www.teac.com/product/ud-501/">Teac</a>, a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Korg-Ds-dac-10-Digital-Analog-Converter/dp/B009YD4NVQ">Korg</a>, the pre-outs from a <a href="http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Home/AV-Receivers/Elite+Receivers/VSX-70">Pioneer receiver</a>, and maybe perhaps others, haven't found them yet (most either on <a href="http://www.audiostream.com/content/dsd-ready-dacs-short-list">this list</a> or derived therefrom).</p>

Please discuss. I'm leaning towards the Teac, myself. Even though I'm fond of Pioneer, I just don't like the form factor as a DAC. However, if I can convince myself to use it as a receiver as well, that'd be different.

List:

Benchmark DAC2 HGC

Chord QuteHD

Fostex HP-A8C
Korg DS-DAC-10

Matrix X-Sabre

Mytek Stereo192-DSD
Oppo BDP-105
Pioneer VSX-70
Playback Designs MPS-5
Teac UD-501

Posted

The Mytek sounded better than the TEAC to me at the DAC shoot out at Blue Coast Studios. The TEAC was not bad, but not as good as the competition.

The Oppo 105 now handles DSD streaming so that should be on the list.

Posted (edited)

EDIT: He beat me.

Al, I and about 40 others heard a problematic comparison between live and the TEAC, Mytek, Benchmark and Playback-Designs (MPx5) DACs. I believe thoughts were posted elsewhere and Stereophile did a silly write up. The PD was crazy good (close to the 45 minute earlier live performance), but difficult to make definitive conclusions without more testing for the others. If that wasn't possible, I'd go DAC2. From the few sample tracks (take this all with a pile of salt), the TEAC and Mytek made the DSD files sound better than the 24/96 PCM (and there were problems with the tests here too). Is this because they specialized in DSD and potentially PCM was sacrificed or that the Benchmark treated both formats with same attention? No matter the Benchmark was more impressive especially in staging with PCM or DSD. If you need warmth though maybe the Mytek (Cookie may have hinted that she thought the Stereo192 & DAC2 came down to system synergy - except on staging). Came away least impressed with the TEAC, which going in I was eyeing. Then again the PD so destroyed the rest the other choices seemed compromised. Been a long time since I was so impressed with a piece of gear.

EDIT 2: Here's the Stereophile/Audiostream summation (opinions not universally held and some problems with tests listed in the comments):

Guitar Sings as DSD DACs Shoot it Out

http://www.audiostream.com/content/guitar-sings-dsd-dacs-shoot-it-out

Edited by blessingx
Posted

Goddamnit, editor just fucked up my first post.  I'll fix it later.

 

I will try and keep a list of "contender" DSD DACs -- I.E. those that are discussed -- those that aren't won't be on the list.  I added the Oppo, the Benchmark, and the Playback Designs, I'll go back and add the Mytek later.  But most of them can be found by clicking the AudioStream.com list.

 

I forgot about the Oppo -- since I might be getting that anyway, and since I am already familiar with the sound of at least one of its predecessors, it's high on my list.

 

You may have noticed that all my others were <US$1K, I.E. "cheap" in the audiophile parlance.  But this thread isn't just for me, so will be happy to keep tabs on any others that are discussed.

 

Ric, I presume you mean the MPS-5, since that's what I found by Googling.

Posted

Just want to note that the Playback Designs MPD-5 is also much more expensive than the other DACs Dusty pointed to ($13,000 retail). (The MPS-5 is $15,000 retail).

Posted (edited)

For a little more than the Teac, the Matrix X-Sabre is an option @ $1100.  Certainly FOTM-ish, but can handle a lot of files (including DXD).  I picked one up, too new to tell how good it'll be, and haven't tried DSD files yet.  Bringing it to NY meet today, will have some files up to max 24/192 Rez....

Edited by skullguise
Posted

Oh, okay, upon further review, Ric meant what he said -- the MPx5, meaning either the MPD5 or the MPS5.

 

So it's in a different league (pricewise) as well as being in a different league (sound quality wise)?  Hmmm...

Posted

The MSB DAC IV and the Analog dac can both do DSD.  They refuse to upgrade the DAC III's even though mine has pretty much the same USB interface as the IV.  Fuckers...  >:(

Posted

there is a middle range Playback designs unit

http://store.acousticsounds.com/d/85620/Playback_Designs-Music_Playback_System_MPS-3-Disc_Players

 

uses phillips transport

 

And the DAC only PD MPD-3 is $6500.  I'm not exactly sure what the internal difference is between the higher and lower models, but the 3 series does not have the outboard USBX transport.  Still, the 3 series each play 24/385 PCM and 6.1 (double) DSD files over USB.

Posted

It plays DSD files. ;)

The Fostex and Mytek were the first two affordable DSD DACs I came across awhile back (while considering an all-in-one box solution for work).

Posted (edited)

Buy it, I am interested to hear your impressions as I might have to pick one up for myself.

Edited by VPI
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Weren't we all gonna peer pressure Shelly into vinyl also though? 

 

No, we are not.   :)

 

I have never liked the DAC1 and I was really quite impressed with the DAC2 HGC on PCM and DSD.  Unless you need preamp capability then saving $200 is good.

 

One should still be able to use it as a preamp, as long as you are using the DAC, right?  I like having $200.

 

Buy it, I am interested to hear your impressions as I might have to pick one up for myself.

I was hoping you were going to buy one and then sell it to me cheap.   ;)

 

I went to Benchmark to order one however, I got a security warning (expired certificate) when I tried to check out.  Since I am paranoid, I decided not to continue (and email the Benchmark people about the problem).   Sigh.   I guess I'll wait until BH/AudioAdvisor or someone else has it or they update their certificate. 

 

By the way, if people are interested, I emailed Benchmark and asked them if one could use the RCA and XLR output simultaneously.  They replied very quickly with the following.

 

"All 3 set of outputs can be used simultaneously without any loss of quality.. Each output has its own output stage, independent of the others."

Edited by shellylh
Posted (edited)

Shelly, I ordered from Benchmark directly before.  Never had a problem with security, but I see your apprehension.

 

That DAC2 D sure looks tempting.  All three outputs at the same time?  That has to be a first to me.  Very good choice to add that second RCA output set.  I am thinking Balanced to power amp, RCA to sub, and RCA to head amp.

 

If anyone gets one, I'd be interested in thoughts.  It really seems like they put a lot of thought into their implementation of that Sabre chip, as the literature is a lot more than just a bit and sample rate wankfest.

 

Edit: And you can still use it as a DAC with volume control, and it seems to be a real step above the DAC1 in that regard.

Edited by roadtonowhere08

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.