Valentin Hogea Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 370 USD incl. all components. Anyone with a bit more experience want to comment on the topology and the theoretical price/performance of this? /V
Nebby Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) Even if I did know anything about it, I would't look at anything from a spammer. Edited March 11, 2013 by Nebby 1
Valentin Hogea Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 Well... First impression means a lot, but from my point of view (which isn't worth much) I'd like to see/hear if he can be more elaborate than just a picture and a word. /V
aardvark baguette Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 haven't seen that shovel icon in a while
aardvark baguette Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 This is an espresso machine. No, no wait. It's a snow cone maker. Is it a water heater? 1
kevin gilmore Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) Well at least its a better circuit board than rudistor. two open loop triode gain stages with cathode follower output. .001% thd at what output level? a nanowatt or two. more or less a singlepower extreme with a lot less power. Edited March 11, 2013 by kevin gilmore
guzziguy Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) Too many capacitors. Edited March 11, 2013 by guzziguy
Emooze Posted March 11, 2013 Report Posted March 11, 2013 I'm still hung up on the RK27 but I am impressed with whatever they covered the board with. That is one shiny circuit board. Must be nail polish.
oogabooga Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 This is an espresso machine. No, no wait. It's a snow cone maker. Is it a water heater? I love that movie.
emelius Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 If anyone ever reverse engineers the Snoopy Sno-Cone Machine, I'm in...Kickstarter, perhaps?...
n_maher Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 If anyone ever reverse engineers the Snoopy Sno-Cone Machine, I'm in...Kickstarter, perhaps?... You might be onto something there, seriously. And Marshall, resistors need love too right? Who are we to judge... [edit]And yay for fudging the colors so bad as to create dog-pecker pink Wima caps.
kevin gilmore Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 OH lookie... schematics removed from their website. That was fast.
Valentin Hogea Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 OH lookie... schematics removed from their website. That was fast. What did I miss? (1) The topology was copyrighted (2) The specs were purely bs or (3) Something else?
grawk Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 3) few amp designers can withstand the scrutiny of kg and spritzer 1
Voltron Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 Serves them right for posting their stupid "beauty shots" or their stupid amp in our DIY forum. Cunty douche move. 1
swt61 Posted March 12, 2013 Report Posted March 12, 2013 You're correct as always DOTU, but aren't all douches cunty? Seems redundant, unless they're are anal douches I'm unaware of.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now