humanflyz Posted January 23, 2007 Report Posted January 23, 2007 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/business/media/22porn.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=technology
aerius Posted January 23, 2007 Report Posted January 23, 2007 Gee, maybe they should rethink those extreme closeups? It's porn, not an anatomy lesson.
TheSloth Posted January 23, 2007 Report Posted January 23, 2007 It highlights a very important problem that poor unsuspecting porn stars experience - razor burn shown up by the camera. Perhaps there should be a charity to help alleviate their suffering? Or perhaps they should be slightly less zealous with their use in the first place. Maybe I'm the only person who doesn't think women make themselves sexier by attempting to look pre-pubescent.
tiberian Posted January 23, 2007 Report Posted January 23, 2007 It highlights a very important problem that poor unsuspecting porn stars experience - razor burn shown up by the camera. Perhaps there should be a charity to help alleviate their suffering? Or perhaps they should be slightly less zealous with their use in the first place. Maybe I'm the only person who doesn't think women make themselves sexier by attempting to look pre-pubescent. no you are not. hahahaha.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now