Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)

Anyone heard the 105 against the NAD m51?

 

 

^Interested in this myself

 

Let me resurrect this thread a bit.  I finally bought a silver BDP-105 and I also currently have the NAD M51.  Overall, I like the M51 better due to its more refined and neutral presentation as well as having wider & deeper soundstage.  I also notice a more solid imaging together with noticeably better bass response on the Nad.  On a side note, I also found the Oppo to be near identical sonically to my W4S DAC-2 after several back-and-forth comparisons.  In the end, I preferred the W4S to the Oppo due to slighty better extension on both ends of the spectrum.  IMO, of course.  

Edited by purk
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Someone I work with got the 103D and RAVES about the video (3D-like at times, he says).  I'd say the extra $100 is well spent, based on his exoerience and what I've read so far.  I'd probably go to the 103D though, as I like my current DACs plenty goodly

Posted (edited)

Worth it to me. I have a lot of DVDs – they probably need Darbee processing more than properly mastered Blu-ray material.

 

I mainly want it for SACD and HDCD playback. My PS3 has been surprisingly good – it should be interesting to see how much more video quality can be extracted from my dodgy movie collection – Anchorman has never looked so good.

Edited by HiWire
Posted

I have the regular 103 and i find the upscaler to work just fine. If i was buying a new player now i might buy it but i would always get my tv isf calibrated first. That is a very big difference to my eyes, i have the Panny GT60 plasma and when i got it it looked amazing. But after the calibration the factory image looks dull and lifeless in comparison and also some of the colors look unrealistic.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Darbee processing is for contrast – i.e., light and dark. I gather that some poorly-mastered DVDs might have more chrominance compression than necessary (e.g. everything is dark and muddy or everything is washed out) – Darbee processing might mitigate this problem. It might also help with color depth.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chroma_subsampling

 

Scaling is supposed to be better on the Oppo than the PS3, but it depends on your source material. It should be the same on the Darbee edition as the non-Darbee.

Edited by HiWire
  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

Everybody raves about the Modwright Oppo, but when I read what mods he does 90% of it sounds like bullshit.

Seems like the tube output stage is the only thing that would really make a difference.

Edited by postjack
Posted

^^^  :laugh:   Actually, they only do Oppo CASE mods, right?

 

Ric @ EVS/Tweak Audio seems to do some fine work, if not the prettiest.  I've had two of his modded players and they kicked aural ass for pretty small money.

Posted

^^^  :laugh:   Actually, they only do Oppo CASE mods, right?

I guess you could call it that.

 

I'll tell you whut, though, if someone were to take a Dell and repackage it in another case without taking it out of the Dell case -- and call themselves a case modder -- they'd go out of business right quick.  At least take it out of the Dell case.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Once, just once I'd like to see an audio review where they compare the modified unit to a stock unit, preferably blind, but I'd settle for sighted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.