Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, not sure about ya'all, but color me impressed.

So far, it has played all the shiny disks I have thrown at it with great effect. This as well as accommodating the optical out of my squeezebox for Internet radio and the HDMI output of my appleTV for streaming audio from my computers and IOS devices. Again, all to great effect. I personally like the sound quite a bit, even at this early stage of getting aquainted.

With the right amp/speaker combo, this unit can certainly act as both source and pre-amp. Sort of like a nice all-in-one combo. A least, that is how I am currently employing it. Source => Amp => Speaker. Looking forward to using it to access a NAS as a dedicated music server. If that works as I would hope, then I think I will be quite happy with the purchase, at least for the price/value ratio, which, seems quite high at the moment.

Note, I have yet to try out any of the video or surround capabilities. Also have not plugged any headphones into it either.

Posted

If he is talking about using it as a DAC for his squeezebox and about having not yet tried the headphone amplifier I'd wager he is talking about the 105.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

http://www.oppo-bluray.co.uk/UserFiles/Docs/PDF/HFN_Oppo%20BDP-105EU.pdf

 

The reviewer is a nitwit, but I noticed this in the sidebar:

 

"However, SACD is now downsampled to 88.2kHz LPCM regardless of whether the Audio Format > SACD Output mode is set to DSD or LPCM (also unaffected by HDMI Audio or Coaxial/Optical output setting)."
 
Not that you would ever hear a difference, but its interesting none the less.
 
 
EDIT:
 
 
Wow, those guys are quick over there (avs). Their comments:
 
"That statement represents a profound misunderstanding of what's going on with SACD DSD audio.


There is no down-sampling for DSD-Direct-to-Analog Conversion nor for DSD output via HDMI. The concept doesn't exist for DSD. There is, however, the required 50Khz filter in the DAC.

For conversion to LPCM, use of 88.2KHz is also not "down-sampling". It is "correct sampling" as it also imposes the equivalent of that 50KHz filter.

DSD encoding is subject to quantization noise in the audible frequencies. SACD counters this by "noise shaping" which pushes the noise up above 20Khz at the expense of making it substantially worse up there. This noise is not due to the quality of the recording or the quality of the playback. It is, rather, simply an artifact of using DSD with noise shaping which has to be dealt with. You keep it from getting to the output via the 50KHz filter as part of converting SACD DSD to Analog.

However, when you convert to LPCM, whatever is downstream of the player no longer knows the signal contains that DSD quantization noise -- it has no way of knowing the signal came off an SACD disc. So no filtering gets applied. By using an LPCM sampling rate below 100KHz the math accomplishes the same thing -- those high frequency noise components get discarded.

Simply put, it is not always the case that a higher sampling rate is better, and converting SACD DSD to LPCM is just such a case."

 

 

This answer makes a lot of sense given the points raised in that XIPH article regarding distortion issues.

Edited by TMoney
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just got an email from Oppo saying I can buy a Roku stick from them to enable Amazon Instant Video, Hulu Plus, and HBO Go for $49.99 (50% off), because I bought a 103 from them. Doesn't come with a Roku remote—it just plugs in to the MHL port.

 

And now they're available bundled with the players when you purchase them.

 

Holy shitsnacks!

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I contacted Oppo customer support last week to check in on the status of a Windows 8 USB driver. They had no updates and said they are still waiting on XMOS to deliver it to them.

 

That (lack of) news after all these months makes me a sad panda.

 

3x06-sexual-harassment-panda-south-park-

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

My interest, on the other hand, has piqued, due to the USB DAC thing -- I had forgotten that was exclusive to the 105.

 

Audio.

Pfff.  After reading the description, they seem to be shooting for two different sound signatures -- "warm" on the 103 and "accurate" on the 105.

Posted

I would say analog audio the 103 is normal and the 106 is much better :) I have the 103 as a transport to an ecp dac and it works fantastic. I have a set of audioengine a2's connected to the analog out of the 103 which serves as a decent preamp of sorts, the downmix to stereo is excellent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.