TheSloth Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 http://www.etymotic.com/ephp/er88.aspx That looks really uncomfortable to me, but it's a nice idea. Quote
ojnihs Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 Yeah doesn't look like a very good idea to me. On another note, I just ordered some ER4P's for myself the other day, so I'm excited. Quote
KenW Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 Now that I could use. Comfort does look like a concern, but I suppose it depends on the weight and balance of those IEM's. Then there's the worry I'll always have about the Ety quality control. Still can't shake those cracked tubes and the BS they gave me when I quizzed them on it. Yet, for some reason, I think I want to try these. Quote
ojnihs Posted January 5, 2007 Report Posted January 5, 2007 they are pretty damn good, ojnihs They "slay," right Reks? Quote
Ben Gramain Posted January 8, 2007 Report Posted January 8, 2007 The 4P/S's certainly slayed my ears. Holy Christ. BT inears looks like a cool idea but jeez it looks dorky. A panyard setup with just the mic moulded in to one side of the in-ear assembly would have been a little cooler looking. Also is it sending re-compressed audio or uncompressed / lossless? Cuz the latter would as far as I know be a first... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.