I beg to differ and justin explained it better than I could have Why would you imagine that? You can select tightly matched, high-quality resistors that are impedance appropriate. In that scenario this first attenuation stage would probably be doing less harm to the signal than the variable attenuator that you're using as a volume pot.
The gain of the the amp is also tuned with compensation caps which should be changed for different gain configurations. So the switch required to change all of that for even two channels would be mind-numbingly complex and the wiring would be begging for noise.
And it would have to be a pretty crappy in-line attenuator to roll off any portion of the signal now that I look into it further. I'm sure there are crappy ones out there, but provided you choose wisely you shouldn't see any real signal degradation. If a source has north of a 2V output you can probably safely cut that in half (6db reduction) and still have more than enough signal for the amp to work with.
I'd only do it on the input. From where I sit the output would be a very bad idea since you'd be destroying the output impedance of the amp.
No pants crapping here, but it does sound like a shitty idea.
Glad they worked out for you. I've been playing with numbers based on Justin's simple resistor-divider suggestion and wondering if something like it wouldn't be a great way to add "gain" adjustment to something like the beta22. It wouldn't be all that difficult to make it up on protoboard and wire it to a multi-position switch. It would make it a lot easier to build the beta so that it would be far more suitable for both speaker (high gain) and headphone (low gain) use.
You talking about my link? It's just a youtube video that won't f'ing work regardless of the 3 different links I've tried, that are all working just fine.
You don't disappoint, the Ed9's do though! *zing*
I'm hoping that next year's CanJam will be in LA so I can make it with the excuse of visiting my little sister. I assume that if the meet is that close some of your big rig will make an appearance?
If that's all it takes for it to be sufficient, great.
Also, I'd love to see the required mods to raise the bias up a bit from the stock 580VDC. I know that some of you have already done this and have specific thoughts about what bias the 950s really like to run at (above 600V). I'm sure this is just a matter of tweaking a few part values.
What are the required specifications for the KGSS trafo again? I was going to contact a trafo-man'f today anyway regarding a custom transformer so I might as well ask them about this project as well.
Colin mentioned the following: 100VA R-core transformer with 300v-0-300v at 80mA,0-6.3v at 2A, 0-18v*2 at 1.2A, and 0-12.6v at 1A.
Nice, very similar to the Skechers that I'm currently wearing. I got them on closeout for $30, I'm a cheap bastard when it comes to shoes.
I'm still pissed that Doc stopped making my favorite shoe, the model 9729. I've had two pairs of those, each of which lasted 4 years or so.
They need a couple more years of pronounced hype to reach Darth levels. They do however hold the distinction of being the crappiest, most expensive stock headphone though.
I cringed when I heard that you'd bought them. From brief experience my conclusion is that they are the most over-priced, over-hyped headphones out there.