morphsci

The Energy Veritas v2.3i are nice speakers. I use them as my front L and R in the HT system and they pass WAF here. Mine look like these No longer manufactured but still show up used once in a while.

The Rx-6s certainly look nice and the front port would be an advantage with your speaker placement.

And this again!

Congrats to you and your daughter Mike. Environmental law sounds cool.

Happy Anniversary Chris!

Happy Birthday Colin!

^^ Those are nice knobs!

FTFY

Happy Birthday Dr. Wood!

I like the way you think.

Actually using the MBA and the iPad works well for me and actually helps with the battery life on the MBA. Most email checking and responding as well as interwebz is done on the iPad. I also keep the brightness toned down and have a short window for turning off the screen when on battery. It comes back up quick enough with the flash storage that it has never really been a problem.

I would rather have my two HP 25" monitors at work and the remaining dollars for whisk(e)y and gin.

I agree with Dan. For most things I do the 11" screen works fine. When it doesn't I have a 24" Samsung monitor that shares duty as my Windows home Server monitor. Even if I won the lottery (and I owned a computer with a Thunderbolt port) I probably would not buy the Thunderbolt display.

Happy Birthday Mr. TechnoGrill!

I have the first generation MBA 11 and am quite happy. I felt no need to upgrade with the newer model and do not miss a slightly bigger screen. My wife has a 13" MBP and compared to the MBA it feels like a 2 ton tank.

The p value is invariant. However my interpretation would likely vary, mostly by amount, not type, of alcohol consumed

I prefer p = 0.0745. Then discussing its biological relevance/nonrelevance in the discussion.

Nope. I was only asking for SPDIF inputs. No drivers required. If they can't do that then I'm not sure I have much confidence in their engineering team. They are definitely behind the curve on this one.

Yeah, that's pretty much a bullshit response.

Happy Birthday!

You're a thought leader.

Probably virtually untying some knots.

Exactly why it has no real meaning, other than to make you feel good. My conclusion is that the results of both experiments are probably the same and "Shit, I should have done a power analysis before data collection!" Yep. Which is why I am not a strict Frequentist, Bayesian or Model selectionist.

Well I do not know if this will be strictly relevant for you but the first edition of this was what led me to start questioning typical Popperian/Fisherian hypothesis testing methodologies. http://www.amazon.com/Model-Selection-Multi-Model-Inference-Information-Theoretic/dp/1441929738/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1329078313&sr=8-1

Do you treat your effects as fixed or random? Many biological effects should be treated as random and thus you have entered, willingly or not, the realm of Bayesian statistics. I do not align myself with either camp BTW.